AbstractMultiband-accelerated fMRI provides dramatically improved temporal and spatial resolution of resting state functional connectivity (RSFC) studies of the human brain, but poses unique challenges for denoising of subject motion induced data artifacts, a major confound in RSFC research. We comprehensively evaluated existing and novel approaches to volume censoring-based motion denoising in the Human Connectome Project dataset. We show that assumptions underlying common metrics for evaluating motion denoising pipelines, especially those based on quality control-functional connectivity (QC-FC) correlations and differences between high- and low-motion participants, are problematic, making these criteria inappropriate for quantifying pipeline performance. We further develop two new quantitative metrics that are free from these issues and demonstrate their use as benchmarks for comparing volume censoring methods. Finally, we develop rigorous, quantitative methods for determining optimal censoring thresholds and provide straightforward recommendations and code for all investigators to apply this optimized approach to their own RSFC datasets.
Inferences and Optimal Censoring Schemes for Progressively First-Failure Censored Nadarajah-Haghighi Distribution