CLOSURE PROPERTY OF SPACE-BOUNDED TWO-DIMENSIONAL ALTERNATING TURING MACHINES, PUSHDOWN AUTOMATA, AND COUNTER AUTOMATA

2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (07) ◽  
pp. 1143-1165 ◽  
Author(s):  
TOKIO OKAZAKI ◽  
KATSUSHI INOUE ◽  
AKIRA ITO ◽  
YUE WANG
Keyword(s):  
Turing Machine ◽  
Nondecreasing Function ◽  
Closure Property ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Turing Machines ◽  
Pushdown Automaton ◽  
Alternating Turing Machines ◽  
Positive Integers ◽  
Pushdown Automata

This paper investigates closure property of the classes of sets accepted by space-bounded two-dimensional alternating Turing machines (2-atm's) and space-bounded two-dimensional alternating pushdown automata (2-apda's), and space-bounded two-dimensional alternating counter automata (2-aca's). Let L(m, n): N2 → N (N denotes the set of all positive integers) be a function with two variables m (= the number of rows of input tapes) and n (= the number of columns of input tapes). We show that (i) for any function f(m) = o( log m) (resp. f(m) = o( log m/ log log m)) and any monotonic nondecreasing function g(n) space-constructible by a two-dimensional Turing machine (2-Tm) (resp. two-dimensional pushdown automaton (2-pda)), the class of sets accepted by L(m,n) space-bounded 2-atm's (2-apda's) is not closed under row catenation, row + or projection, and (ii) for any function f(m) = o(m/ log ) (resp. for any function f(m) such that log f(m) = o( log m)) and any monotonic nondecreasing function g(n) space-constructible by a two-dimensional counter automaton (2-ca), the class of sets accepted by L(m, n) space-bounded 2-aca's is not closed under row catenation, row + or projection, where L(m, n) = f(m) + g(n) (resp. L(m, n) = f(m) × g(n)).

SPACE HIERARCHIES OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL ALTERNATING TURING MACHINES, PUSHDOWN AUTOMATA AND COUNTER AUTOMATA

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (04) ◽  
pp. 503-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
TOKIO OKAZAKI ◽  
KATSUSHI INOUE ◽  
AKIRA ITO ◽  
YUE WANG
Keyword(s):  
Closure Property ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Turing Machines ◽  
Small Space ◽  
Language Classes ◽  
Alternating Turing Machines ◽  
Pushdown Automata

This paper investigates the space hierarchies of the language classes for two-dimensional Turing machines (2-TM's), two-dimensional pushdown automata (2-PDA's) and two-dimensional counter automata (2-CA's) with small space. We show that (1) if L(n) is space constructible by a 2-TM, L(n) ≤ log n and L′(n) = o(L(n)), then strong 2-DSPACE(L(n)) – weak 2-ASPACE(L′(n)) ≠ ∅, (2) if L(n) is space constructible by a 2-PDA, L(n) ≤ log n and L′(n) = o(L(n)), then strong 2-DPDA(L(n)) – weak 2-ASPACE(L′(n)) ≠ ∅, and (3) if L(n) is space-constructible by a 2-CA, L(n) ≤ n and L′(n) = o(L(n)), then strong 2-DCA(L(n)) – weak 2-ACA(L′(n)) ≠ ∅, (4) where strong 2-DSPACE(L(n)) (strong 2-DPDA(L(n)), strong 2-DCA(L(n))) denotes the class of sets accepted by strongly L(n) space-bounded deterministic 2-TM's (2-PDA's, 2-CA's), and weak 2-ASPACE(L′(n)) (weak 2-ACA(L′(n))) denotes the class of sets accepted by weakly L′(n) space-bounded alternating 2-TM's (2-CA's). We also investigate the closure property of space-bounded alternating 2-PDA's and 2-CA's under complementation, and show that (1) if L(n) = o( log log n), then the class of sets accepted by L(n) space-bounded alternating 2-PDA's is not closed under complementation, and (2) if L(n) is space-constructible by a 2-CA, L(n) ≤ n and [Formula: see text], then the class of sets accepted by L′(n) space-bounded alternating 2-CA's is not closed under complementation.

TWO TOPICS CONCERNING TWO-DIMENSIONAL AUTOMATA OPERATING IN PARALLEL

1992 ◽  
Vol 06 (02n03) ◽  
pp. 211-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
KATSUSHI INOUE ◽  
ITSUO SAKURAMOTO ◽  
MAKOTO SAKAMOTO ◽  
ITSUO TAKANAMI
Keyword(s):  
Turing Machine ◽  
Finite Automata ◽  
Space Complexity ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Turing Machines ◽  
Small Space ◽  
Bottom Up ◽  
Constructible Function ◽  
Deterministic Turing Machine ◽  
Alternating Turing Machines

This paper deals with two topics concerning two-dimensional automata operating in parallel. We first investigate a relationship between the accepting powers of two-dimensional alternating finite automata (2-AFAs) and nondeterministic bottom-up pyramid cellular acceptors (NUPCAs), and show that Ω ( diameter × log diameter ) time is necessary for NUPCAs to simulate 2-AFAs. We then investigate space complexity of two-dimensional alternating Turing machines (2-ATMs) operating in small space, and show that if L (n) is a two-dimensionally space-constructible function such that lim n → ∞ L (n)/ loglog n > 1 and L (n) ≤ log n, and L′ (n) is a function satisfying L′ (n) =o (L(n)), then there exists a set accepted by some strongly L (n) space-bounded two-dimensional deterministic Turing machine, but not accepted by any weakly L′ (n) space-bounded 2-ATM, and thus there exists a rich space hierarchy for weakly S (n) space-bounded 2-ATMs with loglog n ≤ S (n) ≤ log n.

Non-closure property of space-bounded two-dimensional alternating Turing machines

2002 ◽  
Vol 146 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 151-170
Author(s):  
Tokio Okazaki ◽  
Atsuyuki Inoue ◽  
Katsushi Inoue ◽  
Akira Ito ◽  
Yue Wang
Keyword(s):  
Closure Property ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Turing Machines ◽  
Alternating Turing Machines

A NOTE ON THREE-WAY TWO-DIMENSIONAL PROBABILISTIC TURING MACHINES

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (04) ◽  
pp. 477-500
Author(s):  
TOKIO OKAZAKI ◽  
KATSUSHI INOUE ◽  
AKIRA ITO ◽  
YUE WANG
Keyword(s):  
Turing Machine ◽  
Error Probability ◽  
Finite Automata ◽  
Nondecreasing Function ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Turing Machines ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Nondeterministic Finite Automata ◽  
Deterministic Turing Machine ◽  
Function Of Two Variables

This paper introduces a three-way two-dimensional probabilistic Turing machine (tr2-ptm), and investigates several properties of the machine. The tr2-ptm is a two-dimensional probabilistic Turing machine (2-ptm) whose input head can only move left, right, or down, but not up. Let 2-ptms (resp. tr2-ptms) denote a 2-ptm (resp. tr2-ptm) whose input tape is restricted to square ones, and let 2-PTMs(S(n)) (resp. TR2-PTMs(S(n))) denote the class of sets recognized by S(n) space-bounded 2-ptms's (resp. tr2-ptms's) with error probability less than ½, where S(n): N→N is a function of one variable n (= the side-length of input tapes). Let TR2-PTM(L(m,n)) denote the class of sets recognized by L(m,n) space-bounded tr2-ptm's with error probability less than ½, where L(m,n): N2→N is a function of two variables m (= the number of rows of input tapes) and n (= the number of columns of input tapes). The main results of this paper are: (1) 2-NFAs - TR2-PTMs(S(n))≠ϕ for any S(n)=o(log n), where 2-NFAs denotes the class of sets of square tapes accepted by two-dimensional nondeterministic finite automata, (2) TR2-PTMsS(n)[Formula: see text]2-PTMs(S(n)) for any S(n)=o(log n), and (3) for any function g(n)=o(log n) (resp. g(n)=o(log n/log log n)) and any monotonic nondecreasing function f(m) which can be constructed by some one-dimensional deterministic Turing machine, TR2-PTM(f(m)+g(n)) (resp. TR2-PTM(f(m)×g(n))) is not closed under column catenation, column closure, and projection. Additionally, we show that two-dimensional nondeterministic finite automata are equivalent to two-dimensional probabilistic finite automata with one-sided error in accepting power.

Preface

1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (07) ◽  
pp. 1023-1024
Author(s):  
Serge Miguet ◽  
Annick Montanvert ◽  
P. S. P. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Finite State Machine ◽  
Finite Automata ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Turing Machines ◽  
Closure Properties ◽  
Working Space ◽  
Finite State ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Alternating Turing Machines

Several nonclosure properties of each class of sets accepted by two-dimensional alternating one-marker automata, alternating one-marker automata with only universal states, nondeterministic one-marker automata, deterministic one-marker automata, alternating finite automata, and alternating finite automata with only universal states are shown. To do this, we first establish the upper bounds of the working space used by "three-way" alternating Turing machines with only universal states to simulate those "four-way" non-storage machines. These bounds provide us a simplified and unified proof method for the whole variants of one-marker and/or alternating finite state machine, without directly analyzing the complex behavior of the individual four-way machine on two-dimensional rectangular input tapes. We also summarize the known closure properties including Boolean closures for all the variants of two-dimensional alternating one-marker automata.

ON THE POWER OF ONE-WAY GLOBALLY DETERMINISTIC SYNCHRONIZED ALTERNATING TURING MACHINES AND MULTIHEAD AUTOMATA

1995 ◽  
Vol 06 (04) ◽  
pp. 431-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANNA SLOBODOVÁ
Keyword(s):  
Turing Machine ◽  
Simple Form ◽  
Space Complexity ◽  
Complexity Classes ◽  
Turing Machines ◽  
Computational Power ◽  
Parallel Processes ◽  
Open Questions ◽  
The One ◽  
Alternating Turing Machines

The alternating model augmented by a special simple form of communication among parallel processes—the so-called synchronized alternating (SA) model, provides (besides others) nice characterizations of the space complexity classes defined by nondeterministic Turing machines. The model investigated in this paper — globally deterministic synchronized alternating (GDSA) model—is obtained by a feasible restriction of nondeterminism in SA. It is known that it characterizes the deterministic counterparts of the nondeterministic space classes characterized by the SA model. In the paper we resume in the investigation of GDSA solving the open questions about the computational power of the one-way GDSA models. It is known that in the case of space-bounded Turing machine and multihead automata, the one-way SA models are equivalent to their two-way counterparts. We show that the same holds for GDSA models. The results contribute to the knowledge about the model and imply new characterizations of the deterministic space complexity classes.

scholarly journals A leaf-size hierarchy of two-dimensional alternating turing machines

1989 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsushi Inoue ◽  
Itsuo Takanami ◽  
Juraj Hromkovič
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Size ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Turing Machines ◽  
Size Hierarchy ◽  
Alternating Turing Machines

CONSTANT LEAF-SIZE HIERARCHY OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL ALTERNATING TURING MACHINES

1994 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 509-524
Author(s):  
AKIRA ITO ◽  
KATSUSHI INOUE ◽  
ITSUO TAKANAMI ◽  
YASUYOSHI INAGAKI
Keyword(s):  
Finite Automata ◽  
Leaf Size ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Turing Machines ◽  
Size Hierarchy ◽  
Minimum Number ◽  
Space Function ◽  
Number Of Leaves ◽  
Alternating Turing Machines ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient

“Leaf-size” (or “branching”) is the minimum number of leaves of some accepting computation trees of alternating devices. For example, one leaf corresponds to nondeterministic computation. In this paper, we investigate the effect of constant leaves of two-dimensional alternating Turing machines, and show the following facts: (1) For any function L(m, n), k leaf- and L(m, n) space-bounded two-dimensional alternating Turing machines which have only universal states are equivalent to the same space bounded deterministic Turing machines for any integer k≥1, where m (n) is the number of rows (columns) of the rectangular input tapes. (2) For square input tapes, k+1 leaf- and o(log m) space-bounded two-dimensional alternating Turing machines are more powerful than k leaf-bounded ones for each k≥1. (3) The necessary and sufficient space for three-way deterministic Turing machines to simulate k leaf-bounded two-dimensional alternating finite automata is nk+1, where we restrict the space function of three-way deterministic Turing machines to depend only on the number of columns of the given input tapes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document