Modules which are invariant under nilpotents of their envelopes and covers

Author(s):  
Truong Cong Quynh ◽  
Adel Abyzov ◽  
Dinh Duc Tai

A module is called nilpotent-invariant if it is invariant under any nilpotent endomorphism of its injective envelope [M. T. Koşan and T. C. Quynh, Nilpotent-invaraint modules and rings, Comm. Algebra 45 (2017) 2775–2782]. In this paper, we continue the study of nilpotent-invariant modules and analyze their relationship to (quasi-)injective modules. It is proved that a right module [Formula: see text] over a semiprimary ring is nilpotent-invariant iff all nilpotent endomorphisms of submodules of [Formula: see text] extend to nilpotent endomorphisms of [Formula: see text]. It is also shown that a right module [Formula: see text] over a prime right Goldie ring with [Formula: see text] is nilpotent-invariant iff it is injective. We also study nilpotent-coinvariant modules that are the dual notation of nilpotent-invariant modules. It is proved that if [Formula: see text] is a finitely generated nilpotent-coinvariant right module with [Formula: see text] square-full, then [Formula: see text] is quasi-projective. Some characterizations and structures of nilpotent-coinvariant modules are considered.

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (06) ◽  
pp. 1950115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahabaddin Ebrahimi Atani ◽  
Mehdi Khoramdel ◽  
Saboura Dolati Pish Hesari

We introduce and investigate [Formula: see text]-idempotent invariant modules. We call an endomorphism [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text], a [Formula: see text]-idempotent endomorphism if [Formula: see text] defined by [Formula: see text] is an idempotent and we call a module [Formula: see text] is [Formula: see text]-idempotent invariant, if it is invariant under [Formula: see text]-idempotents of its injective envelope. We prove a module [Formula: see text] is [Formula: see text]-idempotent invariant if and only if [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] is quasi-injective, [Formula: see text] is quasi-continuous and [Formula: see text] is [Formula: see text]-injective. The class of rings [Formula: see text] for which every (finitely generated, cyclic, free) [Formula: see text]-module is [Formula: see text]-idempotent invariant is characterized. Moreover, it is proved that if [Formula: see text] is right q.f.d., then every [Formula: see text]-idempotent invariant [Formula: see text]-module is quasi-injective exactly when every nonsingular uniform [Formula: see text]-module is quasi-injective.


Author(s):  
David A. Hill

AbstractA module is uniserial if its lattice of submodules is linearly ordered, and a ring R is left serial if R is a direct sum of uniserial left ideals. The following problem is considered. Suppose the injective hull of each simple left R-module is uniserial. When does this imply that the indecomposable injective left R-modules are uniserial? An affirmative answer is known when R is commutative and when R is Artinian. The following result is proved.Let R be a left serial ring and suppose that for each primitive idempotent e, eRe has indecomposable injective left modules uniserial. The following conditions are equivalent. (a) The injective hull of each simple left R-module is uniserial. (b) Every indecomposable injective left R-module is univerial. (c) Every finitely generated left R-module is serial.The rest of the paper is devoted to a study of some non-Artinian serial rings which serve to illustrate this theorem.


1991 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Ansari Toroghy ◽  
R. Y. Sharp

LetEbe an injective module over the commutative Noetherian ringA, and letabe an ideal ofA. TheA-module (0:Eα) has a secondary representation, and the finite set AttA(0:Eα) of its attached prime ideals can be formed. One of the main results of this note is that the sequence of sets (AttA(0:Eαn))n∈Nis ultimately constant. This result is analogous to a theorem of M. Brodmann that, ifMis a finitely generatedA-module, then the sequence of sets (AssA(M/αnM))n∈Nis ultimately constant.


Author(s):  
Lixin Mao

Let [Formula: see text] be the class of all left [Formula: see text]-modules [Formula: see text] which has a projective resolution by finitely generated projectives. An exact sequence [Formula: see text] of right [Formula: see text]-modules is called neat if the sequence [Formula: see text] is exact for any [Formula: see text]. An exact sequence [Formula: see text] of left [Formula: see text]-modules is called clean if the sequence [Formula: see text] is exact for any [Formula: see text]. We prove that every [Formula: see text]-module has a clean-projective precover and a neat-injective envelope. A morphism [Formula: see text] of right [Formula: see text]-modules is called a neat-phantom morphism if [Formula: see text] for any [Formula: see text]. A morphism [Formula: see text] of left [Formula: see text]-modules is said to be a clean-cophantom morphism if [Formula: see text] for any [Formula: see text]. We establish the relationship between neat-phantom (respectively, clean-cophantom) morphisms and neat (respectively, clean) exact sequences. Also, we prove that every [Formula: see text]-module has a neat-phantom cover with kernel neat-injective and a clean-cophantom preenvelope with cokernel clean-projective.


Author(s):  
Adel Nailevich Abyzov ◽  
Truong Cong Quynh

It is shown that every finitely generated right [Formula: see text]-module is almost injective if and only if every cyclic right [Formula: see text]-module is almost injective, if and only if [Formula: see text] is a right [Formula: see text]-ring with [Formula: see text] and there is a finite set of orthogonal idempotents [Formula: see text] in [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] is an injective local right [Formula: see text]-module of length two for every [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text].


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (08) ◽  
pp. 1650145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yılmaz Durğun

Given modules [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] is said to be absolutely [Formula: see text]-pure if [Formula: see text] is a monomorphism for every extension [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text]. For a module [Formula: see text], the absolutely pure domain of [Formula: see text] is defined to be the collection of all modules [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] is absolutely [Formula: see text]-pure. As an opposite to flatness, a module [Formula: see text] is said to be f-indigent if its absolutely pure domain is smallest possible, namely, consisting of exactly the fp-injective modules. Properties of absolutely pure domains and off-indigent modules are studied. In particular, the existence of f-indigent modules is determined for an arbitrary rings. For various classes of modules (such as finitely generated, simple, singular), necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of f-indigent modules of those types are studied. Furthermore, f-indigent modules on commutative Noetherian hereditary rings are characterized.


2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Baidowi Baidowi1 ◽  
Yunita Septriana Anwar

Abstrak. Diberikan  adalah -modul. Modul  dikatakan injektif jika untuk setiap monomorfisma   dan setiap homomorfisma  terdapat homomorfisma   sedemikian hingga . Modul  dikatakan injektif-lemah jika  adalah  -injektif lemah untuk setiap modul    yang dibangun berhingga. Sedangkan  dikatakan mininjektif jika untuk setiap homomorfisma dari  dengan  ideal sederhana dari , terdapat homomorfisma  sedemikian hingga . Kajian keinjektifan dalam tulisan ini meliputi modul injektif, modul injektif-lemah, dan modul mininjektif yang mengkaji karakterisasi dari masing-masing modul. Khusunya ketiganya memiliki karakterisasi yang khusus pada jumlahan tak berhingganya.Kata Kunci : Modul injektif, modul injektif-lemah, modul mininjektifAbstract. Let  be an -module. An -module  is called injective if for any monomrphism  and for any homomorphism  there exists a homomorphism  such that . We say that an -module  is weakly-injective if  is weakly -injective for every finitely generated module . An -module  is called mininjective if every homomorphism , there exists a homomorphism  such that , with  is simple ideal of . In this paper, we give some characterizations and properties of injective modules, weakly-injective modules, and mininjective modules. In particular, they have different characterizations for their infinite direct sum.Keywords : Injective modules, weakly-injective modules, mininjective modules


1980 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1277-1287 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Sarath

The main object of this paper is to study when infective noetherian modules are artinian. This question was first raised by J. Fisher and an example of an injective noetherian module which is not artinian is given in [9]. However, it is shown in [4] that over commutative rings, and over hereditary noetherian P.I rings, injective noetherian does imply artinian. By combining results of [6] and [4] it can be shown that the above implication is true over any noetherian P.I ring. It is shown in this paper that injective noetherian modules are artinian over rings finitely generated as modules over their centers, and over semiprime rings of Krull dimension 1. It is also shown that every injective noetherian module over a P.I ring contains a simple submodule. Since any noetherian injective module is a finite direct sum of indecomposable injectives it suffices to study when such injectives are artinian. IfQis an injective indecomposable noetherian module, thenQcontains a non-zero submoduleQ0such that the endomorphism rings ofQ0and all its submodules are skewfields. Over a commutative ring, such aQ0is simple. In the non-commutative case very little can be concluded, and many of the difficulties seem to arise here.


1978 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 330-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Hiremath

AbstractAs dual to the notion of “finitely injective modules” introduced and studied by Ramamurth and Rangaswamy (1973), we define a right R-module M to be finitely projective if it is projective. with respect to short exact sequences of right R-modules of the form 0 → A → B → C → 0 with C finitely generated. We have completely characterized finitely projective modules over a Dedekind domain. If R is a Dedekind domain, then an R-module M is finitely projective if and only if its reduced part is torsionless and coseparable.For a Dedekind domain R, finite projectivity, unlike projectivity is not hereditary. But it is proved to be pure hereditary, that is, every pure submodule of a finitely projective R-module is finitely projective.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document