ON CLASSIFICATION OF PROJECTIVE VARIETIES WITH NON-INTEGRAL NEF VALUES

2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (02) ◽  
pp. 255-262
Author(s):  
YICAI ZHAO
Keyword(s):  
2000 ◽  
Vol 157 ◽  
pp. 129-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Kebekus

In the present work we describe 3-dimensional complexSL2-varieties where the genericSL2-orbit is a surface. We apply this result to classify the minimal 3-dimensional projective varieties with Picard-number 1 where a semisimple group acts such that the generic orbits are 2-dimensional.This is an ingredient of the classification [Keb99] of the 3-dimensional relatively minimal quasihomogeneous varieties where the automorphism group is not solvable.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 1199-1209
Author(s):  
Euisung Park

AbstractClassical Castelnuovo Lemma shows that the number of linearly independent quadratic equations of a nondegenerate irreducible projective variety of codimension c is at most {{{c+1}\choose{2}}} and the equality is attained if and only if the variety is of minimal degree. Also G. Fano’s generalization of Castelnuovo Lemma implies that the next case occurs if and only if the variety is a del Pezzo variety. Recently, these results are extended to the next case in [E. Park, On hypersurfaces containing projective varieties, Forum Math. 27 2015, 2, 843–875]. This paper is intended to complete the classification of varieties satisfying at least {{{c+1}\choose{2}}-3} linearly independent quadratic equations. Also we investigate the zero set of those quadratic equations and apply our results to projective varieties of degree {\geq 2c+1}.


1991 ◽  
Vol 290 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauro C. Beltrametti ◽  
M. Lucia Fania ◽  
Andrew J. Sommese

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (08) ◽  
pp. 1650066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Crooks ◽  
Steven Rayan

We study equivariant contact structures on complex projective varieties arising as partial flag varieties [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is a connected, simply-connected complex simple group of type ADE and [Formula: see text] is a parabolic subgroup. We prove a special case of the LeBrun-Salamon conjecture for partial flag varieties of these types. The result can be deduced from Boothby’s classification of compact simply-connected complex contact manifolds with transitive action by contact automorphisms, but our proof is completely independent and relies on properties of [Formula: see text]-equivariant vector bundles on [Formula: see text]. A byproduct of our argument is a canonical, global description of the unique [Formula: see text]-invariant contact structure on the isotropic Grassmannian of 2-planes in [Formula: see text].


Author(s):  
Joaquín Moraga ◽  
Jinhyung Park ◽  
Lei Song

Let [Formula: see text] be a non-degenerate normal projective variety of codimension [Formula: see text] and degree [Formula: see text] with isolated [Formula: see text]-Gorenstein singularities. We prove that the Castelnuovo–Mumford regularity [Formula: see text], as predicted by the Eisenbud–Goto regularity conjecture. Such a bound fails for general projective varieties by a recent result of McCullough–Peeva. The main techniques are Noma’s classification of non-degenerate projective varieties and Nadel vanishing for multiplier ideals. We also classify the extremal and the next to extremal cases.


1992 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Ballico

AbstractHere we give a partial classification of varieties X ⊂ Pn such that any two general zero-dimensional linear sections are projectively equivalent. They exist (with deg(X) > codim(X) + 2) only in positive characteristic.


1966 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 21-23
Author(s):  
Y. Fujita

We have investigated the spectrograms (dispersion: 8Å/mm) in the photographic infrared region fromλ7500 toλ9000 of some carbon stars obtained by the coudé spectrograph of the 74-inch reflector attached to the Okayama Astrophysical Observatory. The names of the stars investigated are listed in Table 1.


Author(s):  
Gerald Fine ◽  
Azorides R. Morales

For years the separation of carcinoma and sarcoma and the subclassification of sarcomas has been based on the appearance of the tumor cells and their microscopic growth pattern and information derived from certain histochemical and special stains. Although this method of study has produced good agreement among pathologists in the separation of carcinoma from sarcoma, it has given less uniform results in the subclassification of sarcomas. There remain examples of neoplasms of different histogenesis, the classification of which is questionable because of similar cytologic and growth patterns at the light microscopic level; i.e. amelanotic melanoma versus carcinoma and occasionally sarcoma, sarcomas with an epithelial pattern of growth simulating carcinoma, histologically similar mesenchymal tumors of different histogenesis (histiocytoma versus rhabdomyosarcoma, lytic osteogenic sarcoma versus rhabdomyosarcoma), and myxomatous mesenchymal tumors of diverse histogenesis (myxoid rhabdo and liposarcomas, cardiac myxoma, myxoid neurofibroma, etc.)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document