POWER CLONES AND NON-DETERMINISTIC HYPERSUBSTITUTIONS

2008 ◽  
Vol 01 (02) ◽  
pp. 177-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Denecke ◽  
P. Glubudom ◽  
J. Koppitz

Hypersubstitutions map operation symbols to terms of the corresponding arity. Any hypersubstitution can be extended to a mapping defined on the set Wτ(X) of all terms of type τ. If σ : {fi | i ∈ I} → Wτ(X) is a hypersubstitution and [Formula: see text] its canonical extension, then the set [Formula: see text] is a tree transformation where the original language and the image language are of the same type. Tree transformations of the type Tσ can be produced by tree transducers. Here Tσ is the graph of the function [Formula: see text]. Since the set of all hypersubstitutions of type r forms a semigroup with respect to the multiplication [Formula: see text], semigroup properties influence the properties of tree transformations of the form Tσ. For instance, if σ is idempotent, the relation Tσ is transitive (see [1]). Non-deterministic tree transducers produce tree transformations which are not graphs of some functions. If such tree transformations have the form Tσ, then σ is no longer a function. Therefore, there is some interest to study non-deterministic hypersubstitutions. That means, there are operation symbols which have not only one term of the corresponding arity as image, but a set of such terms. To define the extensions of non-deterministic hypersubstitutions, we have to extent the superposition operations for terms to a superposition defined on sets of terms. Let [Formula: see text] be the power set of the set of all n-ary terms of type τ. Then we define a superposition operation [Formula: see text] and get a heterogeneous algebra [Formula: see text] (ℕ+ is the set of all positive natural numbers), which is called the power clone of type τ. We prove that the algebra [Formula: see text] satisfies the well-known clone axioms (C1), (C2), (C3), where (C1) is the superassociative law (see e.g. [5], [4]). It turns out that the extensions of non-deterministic hypersubstitutions are precisely those endomorphisms of the heterogeneous algebra [Formula: see text] which preserve unions of families of sets. As a consequence, to study tree transformations of the form Tσ, where σ is a non-deterministic hypersubstitution, one can use the structural properties of non-deterministic hypersubstitutions. Sets of terms of type τ are tree languages in the sense of [3] and the operations [Formula: see text] are operations on tree languages. In [3] also another kind of superposition of tree languages is introduced which generalizes the usual complex product of subsets of the universe of a semigroup. We show that the extensions of non-deterministic hypersubstitutions are not endomorphisms with respect to this kind of superposition.

1982 ◽  
Vol 5 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 279-299
Author(s):  
Alberto Pettorossi

In this paper we consider combinators as tree transducers: this approach is based on the one-to-one correspondence between terms of Combinatory Logic and trees, and on the fact that combinators may be considered as transformers of terms. Since combinators are terms themselves, we will deal with trees as objects to be transformed and tree transformers as well. Methods for defining and studying tree rewriting systems inside Combinatory Weak Reduction Systems and Weak Combinatory Logic are also analyzed and particular attention is devoted to the problem of finiteness and infinity of the generated tree languages (here defined). This implies the study of the termination of the rewriting process (i.e. reduction) for combinators.


2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (03) ◽  
pp. 257-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDREAS MALETTI ◽  
CĂTĂLIN IONUŢ TÎRNĂUCĂ

The fundamental properties of the class QUASI of quasi-relabeling relations are investigated. A quasi-relabeling relation is a tree relation that is defined by a tree bimorphism (φ, L, ψ), where φ and ψ are quasi-relabeling tree homomorphisms and L is a regular tree language. Such relations admit a canonical representation, which immediately also yields that QUASI is closed under finite union. However, QUASI is not closed under intersection and complement. In addition, many standard relations on trees (e.g., branches, subtrees, v-product, v-quotient, and f-top-catenation) are not quasi-relabeling relations. If quasi-relabeling relations are considered as string relations (by taking the yields of the trees), then every Cartesian product of two context-free string languages is a quasi-relabeling relation. Finally, the connections between quasi-relabeling relations, alphabetic relations, and classes of tree relations defined by several types of top-down tree transducers are presented. These connections yield that quasi-relabeling relations preserve the regular and algebraic tree languages.


1975 ◽  
Vol 4 (49) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joost Engelfriet

Top-down tree transducers with regular look-ahead are introduced. It is shown how these can be decomposed and composed, and how this leads to closure properties of surface sets and tree transformation languages. Particular attention is paid to deterministic tree transducers.


1975 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurice Boffa

In this note we define a class of properties for which the following holds: If we can prove in NF that the property holds for the universe V, then we can prove in NF that it holds for every set equipollent to its power set.Definition. For any stratified formula A and any variable υ which does not occur in A, let Aυ be the formula obtained by replacing in A each quantifier (Qx) by the bounded quantifier (Qx ∈ SCi(υ)), where i is the type of x in A. We will say that a property P(υ) is typed when there is a stratified sentence S such that P(υ) ↔ Sυ holds in NF.Examples of typed properties are: “υ is Dedekind-infinite”, “υ is not well-orderable”. Specker [3] proved that these typed properties hold for the universe V, and C. Ward Henson [1] extended this result to any set equipollent to its power set. We will show that such an extension holds for any typed property.Theorem. For any typed property P(υ):Proof. Fix a bijective map h: υ → SC(υ) and define for i = 0, 1, 2, …, n, … a bijective map hi: υ → SCi(υ) as follows:For every formula A, let A(h) be obtained by replacing in A each atomic part (x ∈ y) by (x ∈ h(y)) and each quantifier (Qx) by (Qx ∈ υ).


1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 808-812
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Abe

J. Barbanel [1] characterized the class of cardinals fixed by an elementary embedding induced by a normal ultrafilter on Pκλ assuming that κ is supercompact. In this paper we shall prove the same results from the weaker hypothesis that κ is strongly compact and the ultrafilter is fine.We work in ZFC throughout. Our set-theoretic notation is quite standard. In particular, if X is a set, ∣X∣ denotes the cardinality of X and P(X) denotes the power set of X. Greek letters will denote ordinals. In particular γ, κ, η and γ will denote cardinals. If κ and λ are cardinals, then λ<κ is defined to be supγ<κγγ. Cardinal exponentiation is always associated from the top. Thus, for example, 2λ<κ means 2(λ<κ). V denotes the universe of all sets. If M is an inner model of ZFC, ∣X∣M and P(X)M denote the cardinality of X in M and the power set of X in M respectively.We review the basic facts on fine ultrafilters and the corresponding elementary embeddings. (For detail, see [2].)Definition. Assume κ and λ are cardinals with κ ≤ λ. Then, Pκλ = {X ⊂ λ∣∣X∣ < κ}.It is important to note that ∣Pκλ∣ = λ< κ.


Author(s):  
Luiz Henrique Da Cruz Silvestrini

The Logic of the Plausible was introduced in 1999 by Grácio as a particularization of a family of logical systems characterized by the inclusion of a generalized quantifier in the syntax of the classical logic of predicates, denominated the Modulated Logics. The semantical interpretation of these logics is given by a subset of the power set of the universe. In this particularization of modulated logics, it is included the quantifier of Plausible P that engenders the formalization of a type of inductive reasoning so that "a ‘good’ number of individuals possesses certain property". We introduced a new deductive system for the Logic of the Plausible, denominated TLP, built following the principles of the classical semantical tableaux. Besides, we sketched the equivalence of this new deductive system relative to the axiomatic system originally presented by Grácio.


1975 ◽  
Vol 4 (44) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joost Engelfriet

The surface tree languages obtained by top-down finite state transformation of monadic trees are exactly the frontier-preserving homomorphic images of sets of derivation trees of ETOL systems. The corresponding class of tree transformation languages is therefore equal to the class of ETOL languages.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (06) ◽  
pp. 1850091
Author(s):  
Pongsakorn Kitpratyakul ◽  
Bundit Pibaljommee

A linear tree language of type [Formula: see text] is a set of linear terms, terms in which each variable occurs at most once, of that type. We investigate a semigroup consisting of the collection of all linear tree languages such that products of any element in the collection are nonempty and the operation of the corresponding linear product especially idempotent elements, Green’s relations [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text], and some of its subsemigroups. We discover that this semigroup is neither factorizable nor locally factorizable. We also study the linear product iteration and show that any iteration is idempotent in this semigroup. Moreover, we study a semigroup with the complement of the universe set of the above semigroup together with the same linear product operation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document