More on the unimodality of domination polynomial of a graph

2021 ◽  
pp. 2150138
Author(s):  
Gee-Choon Lau ◽  
Saeid Alikhani
Keyword(s):  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Sufficient Conditions ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Domination Polynomial ◽  
Polynomial Formula

Let [Formula: see text] be a graph of order [Formula: see text]. A subset [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is a dominating set of [Formula: see text] if every vertex in [Formula: see text] is adjacent to at least one vertex of [Formula: see text]. The domination polynomial of [Formula: see text] is the polynomial [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the number of dominating sets of [Formula: see text] of size [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] is the size of a smallest dominating set of [Formula: see text], called the domination number of [Formula: see text]. Motivated by a conjecture in [S. Alikhani and Y. H. Peng, Introduction to domination polynomial of a graph, ARS Combin. 114 (2014) 257–266] which states that the domination polynomial of any graph is unimodal, we obtain sufficient conditions for this conjecture to hold. Also we study the unimodality of graph [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is an integer.

scholarly journals ON THE ROOTS OF TOTAL DOMINATION POLYNOMIAL OF GRAPHS, II

2019 ◽  
pp. 659
Author(s):  
Saeid Alikhani ◽  
Nasrin Jafari
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Simple Graph ◽  
Total Domination ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Total Domination Number ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Total Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Polynomial

Let $G = (V, E)$ be a simple graph of order $n$. A  total dominating set of $G$ is a subset $D$ of $V$, such that every vertex of $V$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in  $D$. The total domination number of $G$ is  minimum cardinality of  total dominating set in $G$ and is denoted by $\gamma_t(G)$. The total domination polynomial of $G$ is the polynomial $D_t(G,x)=\sum_{i=\gamma_t(G)}^n d_t(G,i)$, where $d_t(G,i)$ is the number of total dominating sets of $G$ of size $i$. In this paper, we study roots of the total domination polynomial of some graphs.  We show that  all roots of $D_t(G, x)$ lie in the circle with center $(-1, 0)$ and radius $\sqrt[\delta]{2^n-1}$, where $\delta$ is the minimum degree of $G$. As a consequence, we prove that if $\delta\geq \frac{2n}{3}$,  then every integer root of $D_t(G, x)$ lies in the set $\{-3,-2,-1,0\}$.

The strong nonsplit domination polynomial of some graphs

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (04) ◽  
pp. 2050053
Author(s):  
D. Kiruba Packiarani ◽  
Y. Therese Sunitha Mary
Keyword(s):  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Domination Polynomial ◽  
Polynomial Formula

The strong nonsplit domination polynomial of a graph [Formula: see text] of order [Formula: see text] is the polynomial [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the number of strong nonsplit dominating sets of [Formula: see text] of size [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] is the strong nonsplit domination number of [Formula: see text]. We obtain some properties of [Formula: see text] and its coefficients. Also, we compute the polynomial for some specific graphs.

scholarly journals New Bounds on the Double Total Domination Number of Graphs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cabrera-Martínez ◽  
F. A. Hernández-Mira
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Total Domination ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Total Domination Number ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Total Dominating Set

AbstractLet G be a graph of minimum degree at least two. A set $$D\subseteq V(G)$$ D ⊆ V ( G ) is said to be a double total dominating set of G if $$|N(v)\cap D|\ge 2$$ | N ( v ) ∩ D | ≥ 2 for every vertex $$v\in V(G)$$ v ∈ V ( G ) . The minimum cardinality among all double total dominating sets of G is the double total domination number of G. In this article, we continue with the study of this parameter. In particular, we provide new bounds on the double total domination number in terms of other domination parameters. Some of our results are tight bounds that improve some well-known results.

scholarly journals Distance Domination and Distance Irredundance in Graphs

10.37236/953 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Hansberg ◽  
Dirk Meierling ◽  
Lutz Volkmann
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Distance Domination

A set $D\subseteq V$ of vertices is said to be a (connected) distance $k$-dominating set of $G$ if the distance between each vertex $u\in V-D$ and $D$ is at most $k$ (and $D$ induces a connected graph in $G$). The minimum cardinality of a (connected) distance $k$-dominating set in $G$ is the (connected) distance $k$-domination number of $G$, denoted by $\gamma_k(G)$ ($\gamma_k^c(G)$, respectively). The set $D$ is defined to be a total $k$-dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V$ is within distance $k$ from some vertex of $D$ other than itself. The minimum cardinality among all total $k$-dominating sets of $G$ is called the total $k$-domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $\gamma_k^t(G)$. For $x\in X\subseteq V$, if $N^k[x]-N^k[X-x]\neq\emptyset$, the vertex $x$ is said to be $k$-irredundant in $X$. A set $X$ containing only $k$-irredundant vertices is called $k$-irredundant. The $k$-irredundance number of $G$, denoted by $ir_k(G)$, is the minimum cardinality taken over all maximal $k$-irredundant sets of vertices of $G$. In this paper we establish lower bounds for the distance $k$-irredundance number of graphs and trees. More precisely, we prove that ${5k+1\over 2}ir_k(G)\geq \gamma_k^c(G)+2k$ for each connected graph $G$ and $(2k+1)ir_k(T)\geq\gamma_k^c(T)+2k\geq |V|+2k-kn_1(T)$ for each tree $T=(V,E)$ with $n_1(T)$ leaves. A class of examples shows that the latter bound is sharp. The second inequality generalizes a result of Meierling and Volkmann and Cyman, Lemańska and Raczek regarding $\gamma_k$ and the first generalizes a result of Favaron and Kratsch regarding $ir_1$. Furthermore, we shall show that $\gamma_k^c(G)\leq{3k+1\over2}\gamma_k^t(G)-2k$ for each connected graph $G$, thereby generalizing a result of Favaron and Kratsch regarding $k=1$.

Pitchfork domination in graphs

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 2050025
Author(s):  
Manal N. Al-Harere ◽  
Mohammed A. Abdlhusein
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Degree ◽  
Undirected Graph ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
New Model ◽  
Domination In Graphs

In this paper, a new model of domination in graphs called the pitchfork domination is introduced. Let [Formula: see text] be a finite, simple and undirected graph without isolated vertices, a subset [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is a pitchfork dominating set if every vertex [Formula: see text] dominates at least [Formula: see text] and at most [Formula: see text] vertices of [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are non-negative integers. The domination number of [Formula: see text], denotes [Formula: see text] is a minimum cardinality over all pitchfork dominating sets in [Formula: see text]. In this work, pitchfork domination when [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] is studied. Some bounds on [Formula: see text] related to the order, size, minimum degree, maximum degree of a graph and some properties are given. Pitchfork domination is determined for some known and new modified graphs. Finally, a question has been answered and discussed that; does every finite, simple and undirected graph [Formula: see text] without isolated vertices have a pitchfork domination or not?

Double hop dominating sets in graphs

2020 ◽  
pp. 2150057
Author(s):  
Reynaldo V. Mollejon ◽  
Sergio R. Canoy
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Binary Operations

Let [Formula: see text] be a connected graph of order [Formula: see text]. A subset [Formula: see text] is a double hop dominating set (or a double [Formula: see text]-step dominating set) if [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text], for each [Formula: see text]. The smallest cardinality of a double hop dominating set of [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text], is the double hop domination number of [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we investigate the concept of double hop dominating sets and study it for graphs resulting from some binary operations.

scholarly journals On the Total Outer k-Independent Domination Number of Graphs

Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abel Cabrera-Martínez ◽  
Juan Carlos Hernández-Gómez ◽  
Ernesto Parra-Inza ◽  
José María Sigarreta Almira
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Total Dominating Set ◽  
Np Hard Problem ◽  
Independent Domination ◽  
Independent Dominating Set ◽  
Computational Properties

A set of vertices of a graph G is a total dominating set if every vertex of G is adjacent to at least one vertex in such a set. We say that a total dominating set D is a total outer k-independent dominating set of G if the maximum degree of the subgraph induced by the vertices that are not in D is less or equal to k − 1 . The minimum cardinality among all total outer k-independent dominating sets is the total outer k-independent domination number of G. In this article, we introduce this parameter and begin with the study of its combinatorial and computational properties. For instance, we give several closed relationships between this novel parameter and other ones related to domination and independence in graphs. In addition, we give several Nordhaus–Gaddum type results. Finally, we prove that computing the total outer k-independent domination number of a graph G is an NP-hard problem.

The minimum eccentric distance sum of trees with given distance k-domination number

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (04) ◽  
pp. 2050052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidan Pei ◽  
Xiangfeng Pan
Keyword(s):  
Positive Integer ◽  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Number Formula ◽  
Simple Connected Graph ◽  
Eccentric Distance ◽  
Distance Formula

Let [Formula: see text] be a positive integer and [Formula: see text] be a simple connected graph. The eccentric distance sum of [Formula: see text] is defined as [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the maximum distance from [Formula: see text] to any other vertex and [Formula: see text] is the sum of all distances from [Formula: see text]. A set [Formula: see text] is a distance [Formula: see text]-dominating set of [Formula: see text] if for every vertex [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] for some vertex [Formula: see text]. The minimum cardinality among all distance [Formula: see text]-dominating sets of [Formula: see text] is called the distance [Formula: see text]-domination number [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text]. In this paper, the trees among all [Formula: see text]-vertex trees with distance [Formula: see text]-domination number [Formula: see text] having the minimal eccentric distance sum are determined.

On the minimum vertex covering transversal dominating sets in graphs and their classification

2017 ◽  
Vol 09 (05) ◽  
pp. 1750069 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Vasanthi ◽  
K. Subramanian
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Vertex Covering ◽  
Number Formula ◽  
Covering Set ◽  
Simple Connected Graph

Let [Formula: see text] be a simple and connected graph. A dominating set [Formula: see text] is said to be a vertex covering transversal dominating set if it intersects every minimum vertex covering set of [Formula: see text]. The vertex covering transversal domination number [Formula: see text] is the minimum cardinality among all vertex covering transversal dominating sets of [Formula: see text]. A vertex covering transversal dominating set of minimum cardinality [Formula: see text] is called a minimum vertex covering transversal dominating set or simply a [Formula: see text]-set. In this paper, we prove some general theorems on the vertex covering transversal domination number of a simple connected graph. We also provide some results about [Formula: see text]-sets and try to classify those sets based on their intersection with the minimum vertex covering sets.

scholarly journals Graphs with Constant Sum of Domination and Inverse Domination Numbers

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Tamizh Chelvam ◽  
T. Asir
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Complete Characterization ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Connected Graphs ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Domination Numbers

A subset D of the vertex set of a graph G, is a dominating set if every vertex in V−D is adjacent to at least one vertex in D. The domination number γ(G) is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of G. A subset of V−D, which is also a dominating set of G is called an inverse dominating set of G with respect to D. The inverse domination number γ′(G) is the minimum cardinality of the inverse dominating sets. Domke et al. (2004) characterized connected graphs G with γ(G)+γ′(G)=n, where n is the number of vertices in G. It is the purpose of this paper to give a complete characterization of graphs G with minimum degree at least two and γ(G)+γ′(G)=n−1.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document