Geophysical characterization of the upper crust in the transitional zone between the Pampean flat slab and the normal subduction segment to the south (32–34°S): Andes of the Frontal Cordillera to the Sierras Pampeanas

2014 ◽  
Vol 399 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sánchez ◽  
F. Lince Klinger ◽  
M. P. Martinez ◽  
O. Alvarez ◽  
F. Ruiz ◽  
...  
Tectonics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Santolaria ◽  
C. Ayala ◽  
E. L. Pueyo ◽  
F. M. Rubio ◽  
R. Soto ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 111-126
Author(s):  
I. K. Pashkevich ◽  
O. M. Rusakov

The transregional Kherson—Smolensk suture has been established to be located between large meridional faults of the crystalline crust of the Ukrainian Shield (USh) in a strip of 50—70 km width and separates two microplates of different composition of the Precambrian basement. It is traced by subcrustal mantle heterogeneity in the lithosphere and a change in the relief of the main geodynamic boundary. The suture controls the USh large multiphase magmatic massifs and manifestation of the basic mafic magmatism in the Dniepr-Donets Depressin (DDD), which age decreases from south to north from the Early Proterozoic in the shield to the Devonian in the depression. On both sides of it, the crystalline crust differs in a set of parameters including a zone of low velocities in the area of the Novokonstantinovsky ore field of the USh to the east of the Kherson—Smolensk suture, where from DSS data its maximum thickness is 10—15 km in the upper crust. It appears to bea source of abiogenic hydrogen manifestations recorded by mining operations on this field. The Kherson—Smolensk suture, being a transregional mantle feature, unites the existing hydrocarbon manifestation in the USh with the promising hydrocarbon areas of the DDD. The inhomogeneities of the crystalline crust and the uppermost mantle give strong evidences to classify reasonably the transregional tectonic suture Kherson—Smolensk as a powerful mantle long-lived magmatic and fluid-conducting channel. Ores hows and modern degassing of methane are related to it, with methane beingmain greenhouse gas.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Rocco Cavanna ◽  
Ernesto Caselgrandi ◽  
Elisa Corti ◽  
Alessandro Amato del Monte ◽  
Massimo Fervari ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Luhmann ◽  
◽  
Susan L. Bilek ◽  
Ronni Grapenthin ◽  
Jonathan B. Martin

Author(s):  
Hala Maher Ahmed ◽  
Ahmed Ebrahim Ebeed ◽  
Ahmed Hamdy ◽  
Mohamed Abou El-Ghar ◽  
Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek

Abstract Background A retrospective study was conducted on 71 consecutive patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) with a mean age of 56 years and underwent mp-MRI of the prostate at 3 Tesla MRI. Two readers recognized all prostatic lesions, and each lesion had a score according to Prostate Imaging–Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS-v2). Purpose of the study To evaluate the interobserver agreement of PI-RADS-v2 in characterization of prostatic lesions using multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) at 3 Tesla MRI. Results The overall interobserver agreement of PI-RADS-v2 for both zones was excellent (k = 0.81, percent agreement = 94.9%). In the peripheral zone (PZ) lesions are the interobserver agreement for PI-RADS II (k = 0.78, percent agreement = 83.9%), PI-RADS III (k = 0.66, percent agreement = 91.3 %), PI-RADS IV (k = 0.69, percent agreement = 93.5%), and PI-RADS V (k = 0.91, percent agreement = 95.7 %). In the transitional zone (TZ) lesions are the interobserver agreement for PI-RADS I (k = 0.98, percent of agreement = 96%), PI-RADS II (k = 0.65, percent agreement = 96%), PI-RADS III (k = 0.65, percent agreement = 88%), PI-RADS IV (k = 0.83, percent agreement = 96%), and PI-RADS V (k = 0.82, percent agreement = 92%). Conclusion We concluded that PI-RADS-v2 is a reliable and a reproducible imaging modality for the characterization of prostatic lesions and detection of PCa.


2007 ◽  
Vol 79 (10) ◽  
pp. 1518-1526 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Lennon ◽  
O. Cashman ◽  
K. Lane ◽  
B. Cryan ◽  
H. O'Shea

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e75425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xie Zhenyu ◽  
Ke Shaowen ◽  
Hu Chaoqun ◽  
Zhu Zhixiong ◽  
Wang Shifeng ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document