Private Subnetting One (PS1), an Algorithm for Private IPv4 Address Allocation

Author(s):  
Nabhan Hamadneh ◽  
David Murray
Keyword(s):  
2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoqiao Meng ◽  
Zhiguo Xu ◽  
Beichuan Zhang ◽  
Geoff Huston ◽  
Songwu Lu ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 926-930 ◽  
pp. 2074-2078
Author(s):  
Xiao Ya Han ◽  
Qian Zhang ◽  
Jian Zhong Jin

As IPv4 address resource being exhausted, the transition from IPv4 to IPv6 is urgent. According to the status of the enterprise network, IPv6 forwarding performance and IPv6 transition technology of the enterprise network equipment was tested. Furthermore, IPv6 transition principles and process for the enterprise network were presented on this basis. In the transition program the cost, complexity, technology maturity and transition smoothness was taken into account. Test results and IPv6 transition program provide a reference for other enterprise network transition process.


2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nejc Skoberne ◽  
Olaf Maennel ◽  
Iain Phillips ◽  
Randy Bush ◽  
Jan Zorz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Muhammad Ismu Haji ◽  
Sugeng Purwantoro E.S.G.S ◽  
Satria Perdana Arifin

Using of IP addresses is currently still using IPv4. Meanwhile, the availability of the IPv4 address is gradually diminishes. IPv4 has a limited address capacity. IPv6 was developed with a capacity greater than IPv4. Connect between IPv4 and IPv6 without having to interfere with the existing infrastructure. So, methods like tunneling are needed. Tunneling builds a way that IPv4 and IPv6 can communicate. 6to4 tuning makes IPv6 able to communicate with IPv4 over IPv4 infrastructure. Real time communication is needed by internet users to be able to connect to each other. One of the real time communications is VoIP. To find out the quality of tunneling implemented on a VoIP network, it will analyze QoS such as delay, packet loss, and jitter. Delay obtained is 20,01ms for IPv4, 19,99ms for IPv6 and 20,03ms for 6to4. Packet loss obtained 0,01% for IPv4, IPv6 0,01% and 6to4 0,08%. The obtained jitter is 7,96ms for IPv4, IPv6 7.39ms, and 8,48 for 6to4. The test results show that using IPv6 gets a better QoS value than using IPv4 and 6to4 tunneling. The results using 6to4 tunneling obtained the highest QoS value between IPv4 and IPv6. Implementation using 6to4 tunneling results in high results because, IPv6 packets that are sent are wrapped into the IPv4 form to get through the IPv4 infrastructure. 


Author(s):  
Mihály Orosz

The IP-multicast transmission is the IP level answer for the growing one-to-many content spreading needs in multimedia applications (Hosszú, 2005). Nevertheless the address allocation and service discovery is a problematic field of this technology. Despite of the efficiency of the IP-multicast it has not been deployed in the whole Internet. Especially the global address allocation is a problematic part of the Internet-wide multicasting. This article addresses such problems in order to review the existing methods and the emerging research results. The IP-multicasting uses a shared IPv4 address range. In Internet-wide applications the dynamic allocation and reuse of the addresses is essential. Recent Internet-wide IP-multicasting protocols (MBGP/ MSDP/PIM-SM) have a scalability or complexity problem. The article introduces the existing solution for the wide-area multicasting and also proposes a novel method, which overcomes the limitations of the previous approaches.


2011 ◽  
Vol 268-270 ◽  
pp. 1940-1942
Author(s):  
Kai Yin Huang ◽  
Yan Xia Xu ◽  
Li Juan Wen ◽  
Bao Jun Gao

This paper introduces the OLSR routing protocol,IPv4 and IPv6 address protocol's characteristics and internal mechanism.Through simulation, we will see the performance of OLSR routing protocol based on IPv4 and IPv6 address protocol.Experiments show that less HELLO message and TC message will need and smaller jitter will get while using the OLSR routing protocol based on IPv6.But bigger delay and smaller throughput will appear compared with OLSR routing protocol based on IPv4 address protocol.


Author(s):  
Sebastian Zander ◽  
Lachlan L. H. Andrew ◽  
Grenville Armitage ◽  
Geoff Huston

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document