A multi-institution exploration of peer instruction in practice

Author(s):  
Cynthia Taylor ◽  
Jaime Spacco ◽  
David P. Bunde ◽  
Andrew Petersen ◽  
Soohyun Nam Liao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (59) ◽  
pp. 108-130
Author(s):  
Simone Maren Günther ◽  
Amauri Casarin jr. ◽  
Antonio Massao Eto ◽  
Daniele Thoaldo ◽  
Daiane Lolatto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

O seguinte trabalho trata da aplicação da metodologia Peer Instruction em cursos de graduação de diferentes áreas na Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná. Inicia se com uma explicação fundamentada da metodologia idealizada pelo seu criador, o Professor Eric Mazur e logo relata como cada professor teve que adaptar a metodologia para aplicar na sua disciplina. Ao todo foram oito professores pesquisando e comparando os resultados das avaliações antes e depois da aplicação da metodologia. Alguns gráficos foram incluídos para melhor visualização dos resultados.


Author(s):  
Dennis Bouvier ◽  
Ellie Lovellette ◽  
John Matta ◽  
Jing Bai ◽  
Jacqueline Chetty ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 384-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary C. Schuller ◽  
Debra A. DaRosa ◽  
Marie L. Crandall

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandra Turpen ◽  
Melissa Dancy ◽  
Charles Henderson ◽  
Chandralekha Singh ◽  
Mel Sabella ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
S P Rao ◽  
S E DiCarlo

Peer instruction is a cooperative-learning technique that promotes critical thinking, problem solving, and decision-making skills. Benson's think-pair-share and Mazur's peer-instruction techniques are simple cooperative exercises that promote student's participation in class and increase student's interaction with each other and with the instructor in a large classroom. We borrowed concepts from Benson and Mazur and applied these concepts to enhance student involvement during the respiratory component of the medical physiology class. The medical physiology class consisted of 256 first-year medical students. The peer-instruction technique was used for 10 classes. Each class of 50 min was divided into three or four short presentations of 12-20 min. Each presentation was followed by a one-question, multiple-choice quiz on the subject discussed. Questions ranged from simple recall to those testing complex intellectual activities. Students were given 1 min to think and to record their first answer. Subsequently, students were allowed 1 min to discuss their answers with their classmates and possibly correct their first response. The percentage of correct answers increased significantly (P < 0.05) after discussion for both recall and intellectual questions. These data demonstrate that pausing three to four times during a 50-min class to allow discussion of concepts enhanced the students level of understanding and ability to synthesize and integrate material.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 065705
Author(s):  
Chun-Ling Zhang ◽  
Zhen-Yu Hou ◽  
Yu-Chang Si ◽  
Xiao-Qing Wen ◽  
Lei Tang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document