Simultaneous interaction with a large display by many users

Author(s):  
Yuriko Sakakibara ◽  
Yoshio Matsuda ◽  
Takashi Komuro ◽  
Kayo Ogawa
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 229-244
Author(s):  
Sriram Karthik Badam ◽  
Niklas Elmqvist

Visualization interfaces designed for heterogeneous devices such as wall displays and mobile screens must be responsive to varying display dimensions, resolution, and interaction capabilities. In this paper, we report on two user studies of visual representations for large versus small displays. The goal of our experiments was to investigate differences between a large vertical display and a mobile hand-held display in terms of the data comprehension and the quality of resulting insights. To this end, we developed a visual interface with a coordinated multiple view layout for the large display and two alternative designs of the same interface – a space-saving boundary visualization layout and an overview layout – for the mobile condition. The first experiment was a controlled laboratory study designed to evaluate the effect of display size on the perception of changes in a visual representation, and yielded significant correctness differences even while completion time remained similar. The second evaluation was a qualitative study in a practical setting and showed that participants were able to easily associate and work with the responsive visualizations. Based on the results, we conclude the paper by providing new guidelines for screen-responsive visualization interfaces.


2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. B. Yang ◽  
S. H. Choi ◽  
K. K. Yuen ◽  
L. K. Y. Chan

Author(s):  
Tao Lin ◽  
Wanhua Hu ◽  
Atsumi Imamiya ◽  
Masaki Omata

Author(s):  
Sidney L. Smith ◽  
Benjamin C. Duggar

Twelve four-man groups searched and counted visually displayed items. In one session, they used a large display shared in common by the group members; in another session, separate smaller displays were viewed individually. Information was presented under conditions of equal visual angle, so that these two display modes were logically equivalent. Performance was 15 percent faster with the large group display than with the small individual displays. There was no significant difference in error frequency. Some subjects preferred the large display, some the small. In a supplementary study, running individual subjects rather than groups, there were no differences in speed or accuracy between the display modes. This suggests that the difference in group performance time resulted from some facilitating effect of the shared display on the process of group interaction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document