New Exact and Heuristic Algorithms for Graph Automorphism Group and Graph Isomorphism

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 1-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stoicho D. Stoichev
1991 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomislav P. Zivković

Author(s):  
Kabir Bindawa Abdullahi

Measures of graph symmetry, similarity, and identity have been extensively studied in graph automorphism and isomorphism detection problems. Nevertheless, graph isomorphism detection remains an open (unsolved) problem for many decades. In this paper, a new and efficient methodological paradigm, called optinalysis, is proposed for symmetry detections, similarity, and identity measures between isometric isomorphs or automorphs. Optinalysis is explained and expressed in clearly stated definitions and prove theorems, which conform to the definitions and theorems of isometry, isomorphism, and automorphism. Analogous to the polynomiality formalization for an efficient algorithm for graph isomorphism detection, optinalysis is however deterministic on polynomial and non-polynomial graph models.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Luis López-Presa ◽  
Luis F. Chiroque ◽  
Antonio Fernández Anta

Graph automorphism (GA) is a classical problem, in which the objective is to compute the automorphism group of an input graph. Most GA algorithms explore a search tree using the individualization-refinement procedure. Four novel techniques are proposed which increase the performance of any algorithm of this type by reducing the depth of the search tree and by effectively pruning it. We formally prove that a GA algorithm that uses these techniques correctly computes the automorphism group of an input graph. Then, we describe how these techniques have been incorporated into the GA algorithm conauto, asconauto-2.03, with at most an additive polynomial increase in its asymptotic time complexity. Using a benchmark of different graph families, we have evaluated the impact of these techniques on the size of the search tree, observing a significant reduction both when they are applied individually and when all of them are applied together. This is also reflected in a reduction of the running time, which is substantial for some graph families. Finally, we have compared the search tree size of conauto-2.03 against those of other popular GA algorithms, observing that, in most cases, conauto explores less nodes than these algorithms.


Author(s):  
Kabir Bindawa Abdullahi

Graph symmetry detection, similarity, and identity measures have been extensively studied in graph automorphism and isomorphism problems. Nevertheless, graph isomorphism and automorphism detection remain an open (unsolved) problem for many decades. In this paper, a new optinalytic coefficient termed as an optical moment coefficient was introduced for optinalysis. Its characteristic efficiency was tested for bijective property, invariance, deterministic polynomiality and non-polynomiality. The test results show that the new optical moment coefficient is very efficient for symmetry detections, similarity and identity measures between two isometric isomorphs and automorphs; and deterministic on polynomial and non-polynomial graph models.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 508-517
Author(s):  
FerdaNur Arıcı ◽  
Ersin Kaya

Optimization is a process to search the most suitable solution for a problem within an acceptable time interval. The algorithms that solve the optimization problems are called as optimization algorithms. In the literature, there are many optimization algorithms with different characteristics. The optimization algorithms can exhibit different behaviors depending on the size, characteristics and complexity of the optimization problem. In this study, six well-known population based optimization algorithms (artificial algae algorithm - AAA, artificial bee colony algorithm - ABC, differential evolution algorithm - DE, genetic algorithm - GA, gravitational search algorithm - GSA and particle swarm optimization - PSO) were used. These six algorithms were performed on the CEC’17 test functions. According to the experimental results, the algorithms were compared and performances of the algorithms were evaluated.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jobin Christ ◽  
◽  
S. Sivagowri ◽  
Ganesh Babu ◽  
◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document