scholarly journals TrustNet: Learning from Trusted Data Against (A)symmetric Label Noise

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amirmasoud Ghiassi ◽  
Robert Birke ◽  
Lydia Y.Chen
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Miladin Kovačević ◽  
Katarina Stančić

Modern society is witnessing a data revolution which necessarily entails changes to the overall behavior of citizens, governments and companies. This is a big challenge and an opportunity for National Statistics Offices (NSOs). Especially after the outbreak of COVID-19, when the public debate about the number of mortalities and tested and infected persons escalated, trusted data is required more than ever. Which data can modern society trust? Are modern societies being subjected to opinion rather than fact? This paper introduces a new statistical tool to facilitate policy-making based on trusted statistics. Using economic indicators to illustrate implementation, the new statistical tool is shown to be a flexible instrument for analysis, monitoring and evaluation of the economic situation in the Republic of Serbia. By taking a role in public policy management, the tool can be used to transform the NSO’s role in the statistical system into an active participant in public debate in contrast to the previous traditional, usually passive role of collecting, processing and publishing data. The tool supports the integration of statistics into public policies and connects the knowledge and expertise of official statisticians on one side with political decision makers on the other.


Author(s):  
Golara Javadi ◽  
Samareh Samadi ◽  
Sharareh Bayat ◽  
Samira Sojoudi ◽  
Antonio Hurtado ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ermyas Abebe ◽  
Dushyant Behl ◽  
Chander Govindarajan ◽  
Yining Hu ◽  
Dileban Karunamoorthy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

IEEE Access ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Nikolaidis ◽  
Thomas Plagemann ◽  
Stein Kristiansen ◽  
Vera Goebel ◽  
Mohan Kankanhalli

Author(s):  
David A. Weir ◽  
Stephen Murray ◽  
Pankaj Bhawnani ◽  
Douglas Rosenberg

Traditionally business areas within an organization individually manage data essential for their operation. This data may be incorporated into specialized software applications, MS Excel or MS Access etc., e-mail filing, and hardcopy documents. These applications and data stores support the local business area decision-making and add to its knowledge. There have been problems with this approach. Data, knowledge and decisions are only captured locally within the business area and in many cases this information is not easily identifiable or available for enterprise-wide sharing. Furthermore, individuals within the business areas often keep “shadow files” of data and information. The state of accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of the data contained within these files is often questionable. Information created and managed at a local business level can be lost when a staff member leaves his or her role. This is especially significant given ongoing changes in today’s workforce. Data must be properly managed and maintained to retain its value within the organization. The development and execution of “single version of the truth” or master data management requires a partnership between the business areas, records management, legal, and the information technology groups of an organization. Master data management is expected to yield significant gains in staff effectiveness, efficiency, and productivity. In 2011, Enbridge Pipelines applied the principles of master data management and trusted data digital repositories to a widely used, geographically dispersed small database (less than 10,000 records) that had noted data shortcomings such as incomplete or incorrect data, multiple shadow files, and inconsistent usage throughout the organization of the application that stewards the data. This paper provides an overview of best practices in developing an authoritative single source of data and Enbridge experience in applying these practices to a real-world example. Challenges of the approach used by Enbridge and lessons learned will be examined and discussed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 149-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryce Nicholson ◽  
Victor S. Sheng ◽  
Jing Zhang
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document