In-Situ Monitoring of Electrode Degradation in Vanadium Redox-Flow Batteries By Distribution of Relaxation Times Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol MA2020-01 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-120
Author(s):  
Jonathan Schneider ◽  
Tim Tichter ◽  
Prashant Khadke ◽  
Christina Roth
2021 ◽  
Vol MA2021-01 (27) ◽  
pp. 967-967
Author(s):  
Marcus Gebhard ◽  
Christina Roth ◽  
Maike Schnucklake ◽  
Jonathan Schneider ◽  
Ming Cheng ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (33) ◽  
pp. 17388-17400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheeraz Mehboob ◽  
Asad Mehmood ◽  
Ju-Young Lee ◽  
Hyun-Jin Shin ◽  
Jinyeon Hwang ◽  
...  

The impact on the performance of all-vanadium redox flow batteries by tin as an electrocatalyst through in situ electrodeposition is investigated.


2021 ◽  
Vol 506 ◽  
pp. 230238
Author(s):  
Zhifei Yang ◽  
Yuge Wei ◽  
Yikai Zeng ◽  
Yanping Yuan

2020 ◽  
Vol 167 (16) ◽  
pp. 160541
Author(s):  
Qian Huang ◽  
Bin Li ◽  
Chaojie Song ◽  
Zhengming Jiang ◽  
Alison Platt ◽  
...  

Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 926
Author(s):  
Nana Zhao ◽  
Harry Riley ◽  
Chaojie Song ◽  
Zhengming Jiang ◽  
Keh-Chyun Tsay ◽  
...  

Polymer membranes play a vital role in vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs), acting as a separator between the two compartments, an electronic insulator for maintaining electrical neutrality of the cell, and an ionic conductor for allowing the transport of ionic charge carriers. It is a major influencer of VRFB performance, but also identified as one of the major factors limiting the large-scale implementation of VRFB technology in energy storage applications due to its cost and durability. In this work, five (5) high-priority characteristics of membranes related to VRFB performance were selected as major considerable factors for membrane screening before in-situ testing. Eight (8) state-of-the-art of commercially available ion exchange membranes (IEMs) were specifically selected, evaluated and compared by a set of ex-situ assessment approaches to determine the possibility of the membranes applied for VRFB. The results recommend perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) membranes and hydrocarbon anion exchange membranes (AEMs) as the candidates for further in-situ testing, while one hydrocarbon cation exchange membrane (CEM) is not recommended for VRFB application due to its relatively high VO2+ ion crossover and low mechanical stability during/after the chemical stability test. This work could provide VRFB researchers and industry a valuable reference for selecting the polymer membrane materials before VRFB in-situ testing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document