Circadian rhythm changes in core temperature over the menstrual cycle: method for noninvasive monitoring

2000 ◽  
Vol 279 (4) ◽  
pp. R1316-R1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary D. Coyne ◽  
Christina M. Kesick ◽  
Tammy J. Doherty ◽  
Margaret A. Kolka ◽  
Lou A. Stephenson

The purpose of this study was to determine whether core temperature (Tc) telemetry could be used in ambulatory women to track changes in the circadian Tc rhythm during different phases of the menstrual cycle and, more specifically, to detect impending ovulation. Tcwas measured in four women who ingested a series of disposable temperature sensors. Data were collected each minute for 2–7 days and analyzed in 36-h segments by automated cosinor analysis to determine the mesor (mean temperature), amplitude, period, acrophase (time of peak temperature), and predicted circadian minimum core temperature (Tc-min) for each cycle. The Tcmesor was higher ( P ≤ 0.001) in the luteal (L) phase (37.39 ±0.13°C) and lower in the preovulatory (P) phase (36.91 ±0.11°C) compared with the follicular (F) phase (37.08 ±0.13°C). The predicted Tc-min was also greater in L (37.06 ± 0.14°C) than in menses (M; 36.69 ± 0.13°C), F (36.6 ± 0.16°C), and P (36.38 ± 0.08°C) ( P ≤ 0.0001). During P, the predicted Tc-min was significantly decreased compared with M and F ( P ≤ 0.0001). The amplitude of the Tc rhythm was significantly reduced in L compared with all other phases ( P ≤ 0.005). Neither the period nor acrophase was affected by menstrual cycle phase in ambulatory subjects. The use of an ingestible temperature sensor in conjunction with fast and accurate cosinor analysis provides a noninvasive method to mark menstrual phases, including the critical preovulatory period.

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul B. Rock ◽  
Stephen R. Muza ◽  
Charles S. Fulco ◽  
Barry Braun ◽  
Stacy Zamudio ◽  
...  

1985 ◽  
Vol 249 (2) ◽  
pp. R186-R191 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. A. Stephenson ◽  
M. A. Kolka

The changes occurring in the esophageal temperature (Tes) thresholds for initiation of heat loss responses as affected by the circadian period and menstrual cycle were studied. Four women exercised at 60% peak Vo2 in 35 degrees C (ambient water vapor pressure 1.73 kPa) for 30 min at 0400 and 1600 during the follicular (F) and luteal (L) phase. Tes, arm sweating rate (msw), and forearm blood flow (FBF) were measured frequently. At rest, Tes averaged 0.3 degrees C higher during L than F at both 0400 and 1600 and approximately 0.4 degrees C higher at 1600 than at 0400 during both phases. During exercise transients, the slopes of the FBF:Tes and the msw:Tes relationships were not different among treatments. The thresholds for initiation of sweating and cutaneous vasodilation were higher at 1600 than 0400 during both phases. Thresholds during F at 0400 averaged 36.44 degrees C for msw and 36.80 degrees C for vasodilation. The thresholds during L at 1600 averaged 37.46 and 37.53 degrees C for sweating and vasodilation, respectively. Our data indicate that the thermoregulatory effector activity during exercise is a function of numerous inputs, and one of these may be hormonal or hormonal-like in action. Controlling time of day and menstrual cycle phase are as important as controlling for aerobic power, age, and fitness in studying female thermoregulatory responses during exercise.


2009 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie K. Hoeger Bement ◽  
Rebecca L. Rasiarmos ◽  
John M. DiCapo ◽  
Audrey Lewis ◽  
Manda L. Keller ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document