Effect of nasal continuous or intermittent positive airway pressure on nonnutritive swallowing in the newborn lamb

2005 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 1636-1642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Samson ◽  
Marie St-Hilaire ◽  
Elise Nsegbe ◽  
Philippe Reix ◽  
François Moreau-Bussière ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Random Order ◽  
Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Cycle ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Electromyographic Activity ◽  
Active Sleep ◽  
Quiet Sleep ◽  
Upper Airways

The present study was aimed at investigating the effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP; 6 cmH2O) or intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nIPPV; 10/4 cmH2O) on nonnutritive swallowing (NNS) and on the coordination between NNS and phases of the respiratory cycle, while taking into account the potential effects of states of alertness. Twelve full-term lambs were chronically instrumented at 48 h after birth for polysomnographic recordings, including NNS, diaphragm electromyographic activity, respiratory movements, pulse oximetry, and states of alertness. Studies in control conditions, with nCPAP and nIPPV, were performed in random order in nonsedated lambs at 4, 5, and 6 days of life. Results demonstrate that nCPAP significantly decreased overall NNS frequency, more specifically isolated NNS during quiet sleep and bursts of NNS in active sleep. In comparison, the effects of nIPPV on NNS frequency were more variable, with an inhibition of NNS only in wakefulness and an increase in isolated NNS frequency in active sleep. In addition, neither nCPAP nor nIPPV disrupted the coordination between NNS and phases of the respiratory cycle. In conclusion, nCPAP inhibits NNS occurrence in newborn lambs. Clinical relevance of this novel finding is related to the importance of NNS for clearing the upper airways from secretions and gastric content frequently regurgitated in the neonatal period.

Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bayane Sabsabi ◽  
Ava Harrison ◽  
Laura Banfield ◽  
Amit Mukerji
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Apnea Of Prematurity

Objective The study aimed to systematically review and analyze the impact of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on apnea of prematurity (AOP) in preterm neonates. Study Design In this systematic review and meta-analysis, experimental studies enrolling preterm infants comparing NIPPV (synchronized, nonsynchronized, and bi-level) and CPAP (all types) were searched in multiple databases and screened for the assessment of AOP. Primary outcome was AOP frequency per hour (as defined by authors of included studies). Results Out of 4,980 articles identified, 18 studies were included with eight studies contributing to the primary outcome. All studies had a high risk of bias, with significant heterogeneity in definition and measurement of AOP. There was no difference in AOPs per hour between NIPPV versus CPAP (weighted mean difference = −0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.76 to 0.37; eight studies, 456 patients). However, in a post hoc analysis evaluating the presence of any AOP (over varying time periods), the pooled odds ratio (OR) was lower with NIPPV (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.32–0.67; 10 studies, 872 patients). Conclusion NIPPV was not associated with decrease in AOP frequency, although demonstrated lower odds of developing any AOP. However, definite recommendations cannot be made based on the quality of the published evidence. Key Points

Care of the Neonate on Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Bedside Guide

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-32
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Guay ◽  
Dru Carvi ◽  
Deborah A. Raines ◽  
Wendy A. Luce
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Parent Education ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Neonatal Morbidity ◽  
Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Team Approach

Respiratory distress continues to be a major cause of neonatal morbidity. Current neonatal practice recommends the use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in the immediate resuscitation and continued support of neonates of all gestations with clinical manifestations of respiratory distress. Despite the many short- and long-term benefits of nCPAP, many neonatal care units have met resistance in its routine use. Although there have been numerous recent publications investigating the use and outcomes of various modes of nCPAP delivery, surfactant administration, mechanical ventilation, and other forms of noninvasive respiratory support (high-flow nasal cannula, nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation), there has been a relative lack of publications addressing the practical bedside care of infants managed on nCPAP. Effective use of nCPAP requires a coordinated interprofessional team approach, ongoing assessment of the neonate, troubleshooting the nCPAP circuit, and parent education.

scholarly journals Effect of continuous positive airway pressure treatment on permeability, inflammation and mucus production of human epithelial cells

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 00327-2019
Author(s):  
Sandra Grau-Bartual ◽  
Ahmed M. Al-Jumaily ◽  
Paul M. Young ◽  
Daniela Traini ◽  
Maliheh Ghadiri
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Nasal Congestion ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Cpap Therapy ◽  
Upper Airways ◽  
Mucus Production ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is the gold standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea, which affects millions of people worldwide. However, this therapy normally results in symptoms such as dryness, sneezing, rhinorrhoea, post-nasal drip, nasal congestion and epistaxis in the upper airways.Using bronchial epithelial (Calu-3) and nasal epithelial (RPMI 2650) cells in an in vitro respiratory model, this study, for the first time, investigates the effect of CPAP positive pressure on the human respiratory epithelial mechanisms that regulate upper airways lubrication characteristics. To understand how the epithelium and mucus are affected by this therapy, several parameters were determined before and after positive pressure application.This work demonstrates that the positive pressure not only compresses the cells, but also reduces their permeability and mucus secretion rate, thus drying the airway surface liquid layer and altering the mucus/water ratio. It is also observed that the respiratory epithelia is equally inflamed without or with external humidification during CPAP application.These findings clearly identify the causes of the side-effects reported by patients under CPAP therapy.

Comparison of Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome

2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 352-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mesut Dursun ◽  
Sinan Uslu ◽  
Ali Bulbul ◽  
Muhittin Celik ◽  
Umut Zubarioglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure

Abstract Aims To compare the effect of early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in terms of the need for endotracheal ventilation in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants born between 24 and 32 gestational weeks. Methods This is a randomized, controlled, prospective, single-centered study. Forty-two infants were randomized to nIPPV and 42 comparable infants to nCPAP (birth weight 1356 ± 295 and 1359 ± 246 g and gestational age 29.2 ± 1.7 and 29.4 ± 1.5 weeks, respectively). Results The need for endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation was significantly lower in the nIPPV group than the nCPAP group (11.9% and 40.5%, respectively, p < 0.05). There were no differences in the duration of total nasal respiratory support, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia or other early morbidities. Conclusion nIPPV compared with nCPAP reduced the need for endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation in premature infants with RDS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document