scholarly journals The central pattern generator underlying swimming in Dendronotus iris: a simple half-center network oscillator with a twist

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 1728-1742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Sakurai ◽  
Paul S. Katz
Keyword(s):  
Central Pattern Generator ◽  
Body Wall ◽  
Impulse Activity ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Pattern Generator ◽  
Excitatory Synapse ◽  
Dynamic Clamp ◽  
Motor Patterns ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Excitatory Drive

The nudibranch mollusc, Dendronotus iris, swims by rhythmically flexing its body from left to right. We identified a bilaterally represented interneuron, Si3, that provides strong excitatory drive to the previously identified Si2, forming a half-center oscillator, which functions as the central pattern generator (CPG) underlying swimming. As with Si2, Si3 inhibited its contralateral counterpart and exhibited rhythmic bursts in left-right alternation during the swim motor pattern. Si3 burst almost synchronously with the contralateral Si2 and was coactive with the efferent impulse activity in the contralateral body wall nerve. Perturbation of bursting in either Si3 or Si2 by current injection halted or phase-shifted the swim motor pattern, suggesting that they are both critical CPG members. Neither Si2 nor Si3 exhibited endogenous bursting properties when activated alone; activation of all four neurons was necessary to initiate and maintain the swim motor pattern. Si3 made a strong excitatory synapse onto the contralateral Si2 to which it is also electrically coupled. When Si3 was firing tonically but not exhibiting bursting, artificial enhancement of the Si3-to-Si2 synapse using dynamic clamp caused all four neurons to burst. In contrast, negation of the Si3-to-Si2 synapse by dynamic clamp blocked ongoing swim motor patterns. Together, these results suggest that the Dendronotus swim CPG is organized as a “twisted” half-center oscillator in which each “half” is composed of two excitatory-coupled neurons from both sides of the brain, each of which inhibits its contralateral counterpart. Consisting of only four neurons, this is perhaps the simplest known network oscillator for locomotion.

scholarly journals Feedforward discharges couple the singing central pattern generator and ventilation central pattern generator in the cricket abdominal central nervous system

2019 ◽  
Vol 205 (6) ◽  
pp. 881-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Schöneich ◽  
Berthold Hedwig
Keyword(s):  
Motor Activity ◽  
Central Pattern Generator ◽  
Sensory Feedback ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Pattern Generator ◽  
Abdominal Muscle ◽  
Excitatory Input ◽  
Intracellular Recordings ◽  
Motor Patterns ◽  
The Brain

Abstract We investigated the central nervous coordination between singing motor activity and abdominal ventilatory pumping in crickets. Fictive singing, with sensory feedback removed, was elicited by eserine-microinjection into the brain, and the motor activity underlying singing and abdominal ventilation was recorded with extracellular electrodes. During singing, expiratory abdominal muscle activity is tightly phase coupled to the chirping pattern. Occasional temporary desynchronization of the two motor patterns indicate discrete central pattern generator (CPG) networks that can operate independently. Intracellular recordings revealed a sub-threshold depolarization in phase with the ventilatory cycle in a singing-CPG interneuron, and in a ventilation-CPG interneuron an excitatory input in phase with each syllable of the chirps. Inhibitory synaptic inputs coupled to the syllables of the singing motor pattern were present in another ventilatory interneuron, which is not part of the ventilation-CPG. Our recordings suggest that the two centrally generated motor patterns are coordinated by reciprocal feedforward discharges from the singing-CPG to the ventilation-CPG and vice versa. Consequently, expiratory contraction of the abdomen usually occurs in phase with the chirps and ventilation accelerates during singing due to entrainment by the faster chirp cycle.

Fast Synaptic Connections From CBIs to Pattern-Generating Neurons in Aplysia: Initiation and Modification of Motor Programs

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 2120-2136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itay Hurwitz ◽  
Irving Kupfermann ◽  
Klaudiusz R. Weiss
Keyword(s):  
Central Pattern Generator ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Aplysia Californica ◽  
Pattern Generator ◽  
Synaptic Connections ◽  
Motor Patterns ◽  
Motor Programs ◽  
Postsynaptic Potentials ◽  
Buccal Ganglia ◽  
Very High

Consummatory feeding movements in Aplysia californica are organized by a central pattern generator (CPG) in the buccal ganglia. Buccal motor programs similar to those organized by the CPG are also initiated and controlled by the cerebro-buccal interneurons (CBIs), interneurons projecting from the cerebral to the buccal ganglia. To examine the mechanisms by which CBIs affect buccal motor programs, we have explored systematically the synaptic connections from three of the CBIs (CBI-1, CBI-2, CBI-3) to key buccal ganglia CPG neurons (B31/B32, B34, and B63). The CBIs were found to produce monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) with both fast and slow components. In this report, we have characterized only the fast component. CBI-2 monosynaptically excites neurons B31/B32, B34, and B63, all of which can initiate motor programs when they are sufficiently stimulated. However, the ability of CBI-2 to initiate a program stems primarily from the excitation of B63. In B31/B32, the size of the EPSPs was relatively small and the threshold for excitation was very high. In addition, preventing firing in either B34 or B63 showed that only a block in B63 firing prevented CBI-2 from initiating programs in response to a brief stimulus. The connections from CBI-2 to the buccal ganglia neurons showed a prominent facilitation. The facilitation contributed to the ability of CBI-2 to initiate a BMP and also led to a change in the form of the BMP. The cholinergic blocker hexamethonium blocked the fast EPSPs induced by CBI-2 in buccal ganglia neurons and also blocked the EPSPs between a number of key CPG neurons within the buccal ganglia. CBI-2 and B63 were able to initiate motor patterns in hexamethonium, although the form of a motor pattern was changed, indicating that non-hexamethonium-sensitive receptors contribute to the ability of these cells to initiate bursts. By contrast to CBI-2, CBI-1 excited B63 but inhibited B34. CBI-3 excited B34 and not B63. The data indicate that CBI-1, -2, and -3 are components of a system that initiates and selects between buccal motor programs. Their behavioral function is likely to depend on which combination of CBIs and CPG elements are activated.

Evolution of air-breathing and central CO(2)/H(+) respiratory chemosensitivity: new insights from an old fish?

2000 ◽  
Vol 203 (22) ◽  
pp. 3505-3512 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Wilson ◽  
M.B. Harris ◽  
J.E. Remmers ◽  
S.F. Perry
Keyword(s):  
Central Pattern Generator ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Lung Ventilation ◽  
Pattern Generator ◽  
Motor Patterns ◽  
Air Breathing ◽  
Longnose Gar ◽  
Isolated Brainstem

While little is known of the origin of air-breathing in vertebrates, primitive air breathers can be found among extant lobe-finned (Sarcopterygii) and ray-finned (Actinopterygii) fish. The descendents of Sarcopterygii, the tetrapods, generate lung ventilation using a central pattern generator, the activity of which is modulated by central and peripheral CO(2)/H(+) chemoreception. Air-breathing in Actinopterygii, in contrast, has been considered a ‘reflexive’ behaviour with little evidence for central CO(2)/H(+) respiratory chemoreceptors. Here, we describe experiments using an in vitro brainstem preparation of a primitive air-breathing actinopterygian, the longnose gar Lepisosteus osseus. Our data suggest (i) that gill and air-breathing motor patterns can be produced autonomously by the isolated brainstem, and (ii) that the frequency of the air-breathing motor pattern is increased by hypercarbia. These results are the first evidence consistent with the presence of an air-breathing central pattern generator with central CO(2)/H(+) respiratory chemosensitivity in any primitive actinopterygian fish. We speculate that the origin of the central neuronal controller for air-breathing preceded the divergence of the sarcopterygian and actinopterygian lineages and dates back to a common air-breathing ancestor.

Gating of Afferent Input by a Central Pattern Generator

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 950-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph A. DiCaprio
Keyword(s):  
Central Pattern Generator ◽  
Sensory Input ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Pattern Generator ◽  
Afferent Input ◽  
Inhibitory Input ◽  
Cycle Period ◽  
Intracellular Recordings ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
Sufficient Magnitude

Gating of afferent input by a central pattern generator. Intracellular recordings from the sole proprioceptor (the oval organ) in the crab ventilatory system show that the nonspiking afferent fibers from this organ receive a cyclic hyperpolarizing inhibition in phase with the ventilatory motor pattern. Although depolarizing and hyperpolarizing current pulses injected into a single afferent will reset the ventilatory motor pattern, the inhibitory input is of sufficient magnitude to block afferent input to the ventilatory central pattern generator (CPG) for ∼50% of the cycle period. It is proposed that this inhibitory input serves to gate sensory input to the ventilatory CPG to provide an unambiguous input to the ventilatory CPG.

scholarly journals Output variability across animals and levels in a motor system

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Wenning ◽  
Brian J Norris ◽  
Cengiz Günay ◽  
Daniel Kueh ◽  
Ronald L Calabrese
Keyword(s):  
Life History ◽  
Central Pattern Generator ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Motor System ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Pattern Generator ◽  
Phase Relations ◽  
The Other ◽  
Output Variability ◽  
Rhythmic Behaviors

Rhythmic behaviors vary across individuals. We investigated the sources of this output variability across a motor system, from the central pattern generator (CPG) to the motor plant. In the bilaterally symmetric leech heartbeat system, the CPG orchestrates two coordinations in the bilateral hearts with different intersegmental phase relations (Δϕ) and periodic side-to-side switches. Population variability is large. We show that the system is precise within a coordination, that differences in repetitions of a coordination contribute little to population output variability, but that differences between bilaterally homologous cells may contribute to some of this variability. Nevertheless, much output variability is likely associated with genetic and life history differences among individuals. Variability of Δϕ were coordination-specific: similar at all levels in one, but significantly lower for the motor pattern than the CPG pattern in the other. Mechanisms that transform CPG output to motor neurons may limit output variability in the motor pattern.

Movements and Motor Patterns of the Buccal Mass of Pleurobranchaea During Feeding, Regurgitation and Rejection

1982 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-211
Author(s):  
ANDREW D. McCLELLAN
Keyword(s):  
Motor Activity ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Pattern Generator ◽  
Behavioural Response ◽  
Rhythmic Movements ◽  
Motor Patterns ◽  
Jaw Muscles ◽  
Behavioural Responses ◽  
Buccal Mass ◽  
Different Types

Feeding, regurgitation, and rejection in the marine gastropod Pleurobranchaea all involve similar but not identical rhythmic movements of buccal mass structures such as the radula, jaws and lips. The part of the motor pattern which produces rhythmic radula movement, as recorded in the major external muscles of the buccal mass of behaving semi-intact preparations, was similar during the three different types of behaviour, suggesting that they share a common motor-pattern generator. Other parts of the motor pattern were only obviously different during the vomiting phase of regurgitation. Differences in the function and motor patterns of feeding and rejection are presumably accounted for by differences in the activity of muscles which could not be recorded from in this study (e.g. jaw muscles). A general conclusion is that buccal rhythms in gastropods cannot automatically be assumed to underlie feeding, and this is particularly true for dissected preparations which do not execute a clear behavioural response. It would be necessary either to record motor activity that is unique for a given behaviour, or to employ preparations which execute unambiguous behavioural responses.

scholarly journals Feedback From Peripheral Musculature to Central Pattern Generator in the Neurogenic Heart of the Crab Callinectes sapidus: Role of Mechanosensitive Dendrites

2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyla García-Crescioni ◽  
Timothy J. Fort ◽  
Estee Stern ◽  
Vladimir Brezina ◽  
Mark W. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Motor Neuron ◽  
Central Pattern Generator ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Callinectes Sapidus ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Pattern Generator ◽  
Neuron Spike ◽  
Effector System ◽  
Spike Bursts

The neurogenic heart of decapod crustaceans is a very simple, self-contained, model central pattern generator (CPG)-effector system. The CPG, the nine-neuron cardiac ganglion (CG), is embedded in the myocardium itself; it generates bursts of spikes that are transmitted by the CG's five motor neurons to the periphery of the system, the myocardium, to produce its contractions. Considerable evidence suggests that a CPG-peripheral loop is completed by a return feedback pathway through which the contractions modify, in turn, the CG motor pattern. One likely pathway is provided by dendrites, presumably mechanosensitive, that the CG neurons project into the adjacent myocardial muscle. Here we have tested the role of this pathway in the heart of the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus . We performed “de-efferentation” experiments in which we cut the motor neuron axons to the myocardium and “de-afferentation” experiments in which we cut or ligated the dendrites. In the isolated CG, these manipulations had no effect on the CG motor pattern. When the CG remained embedded in the myocardium, however, these manipulations, interrupting either the efferent or afferent limb of the CPG-peripheral loop, decreased contraction amplitude, increased the frequency of the CG motor neuron spike bursts, and decreased the number of spikes per burst and burst duration. Finally, passive stretches of the myocardium likewise modulated the spike bursts, an effect that disappeared when the dendrites were cut. We conclude that feedback through the dendrites indeed operates in this system and suggest that it completes a loop through which the system self-regulates its activity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document