Precerebellar Hindbrain Neurons Encoding Eye Velocity During Vestibular and Optokinetic Behavior in the Goldfish

2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 1370-1382 ◽  
Author(s):  
James C. Beck ◽  
Paul Rothnie ◽  
Hans Straka ◽  
Susan L. Wearne ◽  
Robert Baker
Keyword(s):  
Firing Rate ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Mossy Fiber ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Neuronal Firing ◽  
Velocity Storage ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
Motor Error ◽  
Eye Velocity

Elucidating the causal role of head and eye movement signaling during cerebellar-dependent oculomotor behavior and plasticity is contingent on knowledge of precerebellar structure and function. To address this question, single-unit extracellular recordings were made from hindbrain Area II neurons that provide a major mossy fiber projection to the goldfish vestibulolateral cerebellum. During spontaneous behavior, Area II neurons exhibited minimal eye position and saccadic sensitivity. Sinusoidal visual and vestibular stimulation over a broad frequency range (0.1–4.0 Hz) demonstrated that firing rate mirrored the amplitude and phase of eye or head velocity, respectively. Table frequencies >1.0 Hz resulted in decreased firing rate relative to eye velocity gain, while phase was unchanged. During visual steps, neuronal discharge paralleled eye velocity latency (∼90 ms) and matched both the build-up and the time course of the decay (∼19 s) in eye velocity storage. Latency of neuronal discharge to table steps (40 ms) was significantly longer than for eye movement (17 ms), but firing rate rose faster than eye velocity to steady-state levels. The velocity sensitivity of Area II neurons was shown to equal (±10%) the sum of eye- and head-velocity firing rates as has been observed in cerebellar Purkinje cells. These results demonstrate that Area II neuronal firing closely emulates oculomotor performance. Conjoint signaling of head and eye velocity together with the termination pattern of each Area II neuron in the vestibulolateral lobe presents a unique eye-velocity brain stem-cerebellar pathway, eliminating the conceptual requirement of motor error signaling.

Vertical vestibuloocular reflex in cat: asymmetry and adaptation

1988 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. H. Snyder ◽  
W. M. King
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movement ◽  
Head Movement ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Percentage Change ◽  
Slow Phase ◽  
High Temporal Resolution ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Movement Trajectory ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
Eye Velocity

1. We studied eye velocity during the first 2 s of the vertical vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) elicited from cats placed on their sides (90 degrees roll position) and rotated about an earth vertical axis. Vestibular stimuli were presented in the dark and consisted of brief trapezoidal velocity profiles. Eye movements were recorded with a magnetic search coil, and eye velocity was analyzed with high temporal resolution. 2. The first 2 s of upward or downward eye velocity after the onset of head rotation was characterized and compared. Adaptive changes in VOR gain (eye/head velocity) were then induced, and upward and downward eye velocity responses were again compared. 3. The early time course of the vertical VOR was complex. After a latency of approximately 15 ms, eye velocity increased rapidly until it was equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to head velocity. The peak eye velocity decayed within less than 1 s to a plateau of slow-phase eye velocity (SPEV) equal to approximately -0.6 times the head velocity. Peak upward and downward eye velocity was symmetric. The transition from peak to plateau was more rapid for the downward VOR (slow phases downward) than for the upward VOR (slow phases upward). The plateau attained by upward SPEV was approximately 15% higher than the plateau attained by downward SPEV. 4. VOR gain adaptation was symmetric. The percentage change in adapted upward eye velocity equalled the percentage change in adapted downward eye velocity. Both peak and plateau SPEV adapted, but peak eye velocity adapted less than plateau eye velocity. VOR latency was unchanged by adaptation. 5. The trajectory of the VOR response to steps of head velocity could be divided into an invariant and a variant interval. The invariant interval consisted of the initial approximately 15 ms of the eye movement. Neither direction of head movement (upward vs. downward) nor adaptation of the VOR gain effected the eye movement trajectory during the invariant interval. The variant interval began approximately 30 ms after the onset of head movement and approximately 15 ms after the onset of eye movement. In unadapted animals, downward eye speed exceeded upward eye speed during the variant interval. In adapted animals, eye speed during the variant interval, but not during the invariant interval, diverged from eye speed in the unadapted state. We suggest that the initial invariant interval (approximately 15 ms) of the eye movement response trajectory may represent the direct response of the classically described three-neuron arc.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Neuron activity in monkey vestibular nuclei during vertical vestibular stimulation and eye movements

1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 724-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. C. Chubb ◽  
A. F. Fuchs ◽  
C. A. Scudder
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Unit Activity ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Medial Longitudinal Fasciculus ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
Eye Velocity

To elucidate how information is processed in the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) pathways subserving vertical eye movements, extracellular single-unit recordings were obtained from the vestibular nuclei of alert monkeys trained to track a visual target with their eyes while undergoing sinusoidal pitch oscillations (0.2-1.0 Hz). Units with activity related to vertical vestibular stimulation and/or eye movements were classified as either vestibular units (n = 53), vestibular plus eye-position units (n = 30), pursuit units (n = 10), or miscellaneous units (n = 5), which had various combinations of head- and eye-movement sensitivities. Vestibular units discharged in relation to head rotation, but not to smooth eye movements. On average, these units fired approximately in phase with head velocity; however, a broad range of phase shifts was observed. The activities of 8% of the vestibular units were related to saccades. Vestibular plus eye-position units fired in relation to head velocity and eye position and, in addition, usually to eye velocity. Their discharge rates increased for eye and head movements in opposite directions. During combined head and eye movements, the modulation in unit activity was not significantly different from the sum of the modulations during each alone. For saccades, the unit firing rate either decreased to zero or was unaffected. Pursuit units discharged in relation to eye position, eye velocity, or both, but not to head movements alone. For saccades, unit activity usually either paused or was unaffected. The eye-movement-related activities of the vestibular plus eye-position and pursuit units were not significantly different. A quantitative comparison of their firing patterns suggests that vestibular, vestibular plus eye-position, and pursuit neurons in the vestibular nucleus could provide mossy fiber inputs to the flocculus. In addition, the vertical vestibular plus eye-position neurons have discharge patterns similar to those of fibers recorded rostrally in the medial longitudinal fasciculus. Therefore, our data support the view that vertical vestibular plus eye-position neurons are interneurons of the VOR.

Cerebellar role in adaptation of the goldfish vestibuloocular reflex

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 1383-1394 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Pastor ◽  
R. R. de la Cruz ◽  
R. Baker
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Response ◽  
Brain Stem ◽  
Purkinje Cells ◽  
Constant Velocity ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
Eye Velocity

1. The time course of eye velocity responses elicited by head velocity steps was compared in normal, adapted, and cerebellectomized goldfish. Vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) adaptation was induced by combined visual and vestibular stimulation that altered the ratio of eye to head velocity (VOR gain) toward values either higher or lower than the control amplitude. The velocity step consisted of alternating periods of head rotation at a constant velocity of 16 degrees/s zero-to-peak around the vertical axis. 2. The VOR produced by head velocity steps consisted of an early acceleration-related component, the dynamic response, separated from a sustained period of constant velocity, the plateau, by a sag that occurred around 125-150 ms. Latency of the VOR averaged 18 ms for the adducting eye and 20 ms for abducting eye independent of the initial VOR gain. Adapted dynamic VOR responses diverged from the control records at the earliest detectable latency after both high and low VOR gain training. This result demonstrates modification in the shortest latency brain stem VOR pathway, presumably, the three-neuron reflex arc. 3. After acute cerebellectomy the adapted dynamic response was unaltered for approximately 50 ms in the low-gain and 70 ms in the high-gain VOR states. Not less than 30% of the altered velocity was retained throughout the remaining dynamic and sustained component. These results demonstrate that the vestibulocerebellum is not necessary for the maintenance of the earliest adapted eye velocity. Hence brain stem pathways are sufficient for the expression of the modified VOR. 4. Purkinje cells identified by simple and complex spikes were recorded extracellularly in the area of the vestibulocerebellum, where electrical stimulation produced conjugate ipsiversive horizontal eye movements. Independent eye and head velocity sensitivities were determined in response to visual world motion and VOR suppression, respectively. The two signals either added, canceled, or were both present in Purkinje cells throughout the range of eye velocity induced by vertical axis visual-vestibular stimulation. 5. Latency of Purkinje cell discharge to either a vestibular or visual velocity step exhibited means of 43 and 70 ms, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Role of primate flocculus during rapid behavioral modification of vestibuloocular reflex. I. Purkinje cell activity during visually guided horizontal smooth-pursuit eye movements and passive head rotation

1978 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 733-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. G. Lisberger ◽  
A. F. Fuchs
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Firing Rate ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
Rate Modulation ◽  
Cell Firing ◽  
Eye Velocity ◽  
P Cells

1. Extracellular recordings were obtained from 124 Purkinje cells (P-cells) in the flocculus of alert monkeys. P-cell simple spike-firing rate was analyzed quantitatively during various combinations of smooth-pursuit eye movement and passive head rotation. 2. During sinusoidal smooth eye movements, 80% of the P-cells displayed increased firing rate during ipsilateral and 20% during contralateral eye movement. Over the frequency range 0.3--1.4 Hz, firing-rate modulation was proportional to and in phase with maximum eye velocity. During the steady state of triangle-wave tracking, firing rate increased monotonically as a function of eye velocity. Since firing rate was uncorrelated with retinal-error velocity, one component of P-cell firing rate was related to eye velocity. 3. During the transient phase of triangle-wave tracking, when an instantaneous change in the direction of target movement caused a large retinal-error velocity, 40% of the P-cells were related only to eye velocity. Sixty percent of the P-cells displayed an overshoot or undershoot in firing rate, indicating a relationship to either retinal-error velocity or eye acceleration as well as to eye velocity. 4. During the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR), evoked by head rotation in the dark, P-cell firing rate was only weakly modulated. In contrast, when the monkey suppressed the VOR by fixating a target that rotated with him, P-cell rate was deeply modulated. Since the modulation was proportional to and in phase with maximum head velocity, another component of P-cell firing rate was related to head velocity. 5. Of 36 P-cells tested, 35 displayed firing-rate modulation during both suppression of the VOR and smooth-pursuit eye movement. P-cells that reached peak firing rate during ipsilateral head rotation also reached peak firing rate during ipsilateral smooth eye rotation. Average population sensitivitites to head velocity and eye velocity were equal. In three conditions in which eye and head velocity were elicited simultaneously, P-cell firing rate could be predicted by the linear, vector addition of the separate eye and head velocity components of firing rate. Therefore, the relatively weak modulation of P-cell firing rate during the VOR in the dark can be accounted for by the cancellation of equal but opposite head and eye velocity components. 6. The connections of flocculus P-cells to interneurons in the brain stem VOR pathways have been established in other mammals. In the context of those connections, P-cell firing patterns were appropriate to facilitate the eye movements the monkey was required to make. We conclude that the flocculus is important for sustaining any smooth eye movements that are different from those evoked by head rotation in the dark. The eye velocity component may represent an efference copy signal that sustains ongoing eye velocity during smooth pursuit.

Quantitative Analysis of Abducens Neuron Discharge Dynamics During Saccadic and Slow Eye Movements

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 2612-2632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre A. Sylvestre ◽  
Kathleen E. Cullen
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Firing Rate ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Neuronal Activity ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Slow Phase ◽  
Vestibular Nystagmus ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Rapid Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Velocity

The mechanics of the eyeball and its surrounding tissues, which together form the oculomotor plant, have been shown to be the same for smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements. Hence it was postulated that similar signals would be carried by motoneurons during slow and rapid eye movements. In the present study, we directly addressed this proposal by determining which eye movement–based models best describe the discharge dynamics of primate abducens neurons during a variety of eye movement behaviors. We first characterized abducens neuron spike trains, as has been classically done, during fixation and sinusoidal smooth pursuit. We then systematically analyzed the discharge dynamics of abducens neurons during and following saccades, during step-ramp pursuit and during high velocity slow-phase vestibular nystagmus. We found that the commonly utilized first-order description of abducens neuron firing rates (FR = b + kE + rE˙, where FR is firing rate, E and E˙ are eye position and velocity, respectively, and b, k, and r are constants) provided an adequate model of neuronal activity during saccades, smooth pursuit, and slow phase vestibular nystagmus. However, the use of a second-order model, which included an exponentially decaying term or “slide” (FR = b + kE + rE˙ + uË − c[Formula: see text]), notably improved our ability to describe neuronal activity when the eye was moving and also enabled us to model abducens neuron discharges during the postsaccadic interval. We also found that, for a given model, a single set of parameters could not be used to describe neuronal firing rates during both slow and rapid eye movements. Specifically, the eye velocity and position coefficients ( r and k in the above models, respectively) consistently decreased as a function of the mean (and peak) eye velocity that was generated. In contrast, the bias ( b, firing rate when looking straight ahead) invariably increased with eye velocity. Although these trends are likely to reflect, in part, nonlinearities that are intrinsic to the extraocular muscles, we propose that these results can also be explained by considering the time-varying resistance to movement that is generated by the antagonist muscle. We conclude that to create realistic and meaningful models of the neural control of horizontal eye movements, it is essential to consider the activation of the antagonist, as well as agonist motoneuron pools.

Discharge patterns in nucleus prepositus hypoglossi and adjacent medial vestibular nucleus during horizontal eye movement in behaving macaques

1992 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 319-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. McFarland ◽  
A. F. Fuchs
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Vestibular Nucleus ◽  
Medial Vestibular Nucleus ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Prepositus Hypoglossi ◽  
Eye Velocity

1. Monkeys were trained to perform a variety of horizontal eye tracking tasks designed to reveal possible eye movement and vestibular sensitivities of neurons in the medulla. To test eye movement sensitivity, we required stationary monkeys to track a small spot that moved horizontally. To test vestibular sensitivity, we rotated the monkeys about a vertical axis and required them to fixate a target rotating with them to suppress the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR). 2. All of the 100 units described in our study were recorded from regions of the medulla that were prominently labeled after injections of horseradish peroxidase into the abducens nucleus. These regions include the nucleus prepositus hypoglossi (NPH), the medial vestibular nucleus (MVN), and their common border (the “marginal zone”). We report here the activities of three different types of neurons recorded in these regions. 3. Two types responded only during eye movements per se. Their firing rates increased with eye position; 86% had ipsilateral “on” directions. Almost three quarters (73%) of these medullary neurons exhibited a burst-tonic discharge pattern that is qualitatively similar to that of abducens motoneurons. There were, however, quantitative differences in that these medullary burst-position neurons were less sensitive to eye position than were abducens motoneurons and often did not pause completely for saccades in the off direction. The burst of medullary burst position neurons preceded the saccade by an average of 7.6 +/- 1.7 (SD) ms and, on average, lasted the duration of the saccade. The number of spikes in the burst was well correlated with saccade size. The second type of eye movement neuron displayed either no discernible burst or an inconsistent one for on-direction saccades and will be referred to as medullary position neurons. Neither the burst-position nor the position neurons responded when the animals suppressed the VOR; hence, they displayed no vestibular sensitivity. 4. The third type of neuron was sensitive to both eye movement and vestibular stimulation. These neurons increased their firing rates during horizontal head rotation and smooth pursuit eye movements in the same direction; most (76%) preferred ipsilateral head and eye movements. Their firing rates were approximately in phase with eye velocity during sinusoidal smooth pursuit and with head velocity during VOR suppression; on average, their eye velocity sensitivity was 50% greater than their vestibular sensitivity. Sixty percent of these eye/head velocity cells were also sensitive to eye position. 5. The NPH/MVN region contains many neurons that could provide an eye position signal to abducens neurons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Effects of Viewing Distance on the Responses of Vestibular Neurons to Combined Angular and Linear Vestibular Stimulation

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 2538-2557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiju Chen-Huang ◽  
Robert A. McCrea
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Viewing Distance ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Horizontal Canal ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
Vestibular Neurons ◽  
Axis Of Rotation

Effects of viewing distance on the responses of vestibular neurons to combined angular and linear vestibular stimulation. The firing behavior of 59 horizontal canal–related secondary vestibular neurons was studied in alert squirrel monkeys during the combined angular and linear vestibuloocular reflex (CVOR). The CVOR was evoked by positioning the animal’s head 20 cm in front of, or behind, the axis of rotation during whole body rotation (0.7, 1.9, and 4.0 Hz). The effect of viewing distance was studied by having the monkeys fixate small targets that were either near (10 cm) or far (1.3–1.7 m) from the eyes. Most units (50/59) were sensitive to eye movements and were monosynaptically activated after electrical stimulation of the vestibular nerve (51/56 tested). The responses of eye movement–related units were significantly affected by viewing distance. The viewing distance–related change in response gain of many eye-head-velocity and burst-position units was comparable with the change in eye movement gain. On the other hand, position-vestibular-pause units were approximately half as sensitive to changes in viewing distance as were eye movements. The sensitivity of units to the linear vestibuloocular reflex (LVOR) was estimated by subtraction of angular vestibuloocular reflex (AVOR)–related responses recorded with the head in the center of the axis of rotation from CVOR responses. During far target viewing, unit sensitivity to linear translation was small, but during near target viewing the firing rate of many units was strongly modulated. The LVOR responses and viewing distance–related LVOR responses of most units were nearly in phase with linear head velocity. The signals generated by secondary vestibular units during voluntary cancellation of the AVOR and CVOR were comparable. However, unit sensitivity to linear translation and angular rotation were not well correlated either during far or near target viewing. Unit LVOR responses were also not well correlated with their sensitivity to smooth pursuit eye movements or their sensitivity to viewing distance during the AVOR. On the other hand there was a significant correlation between static eye position sensitivity and sensitivity to viewing distance. We conclude that secondary horizontal canal–related vestibuloocular pathways are an important part of the premotor neural substrate that produces the LVOR. The otolith sensory signals that appear on these pathways have been spatially and temporally transformed to match the angular eye movement commands required to stabilize images at different distances. We suggest that this transformation may be performed by the circuits related to temporal integration of the LVOR.

Discharge characteristics of medial rectus and abducens motoneurons in the goldfish

1991 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 2125-2140 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Pastor ◽  
B. Torres ◽  
J. M. Delgado-Garcia ◽  
R. Baker
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Firing Rate ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Medial Rectus ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Sensory Stimuli ◽  
Time Constants ◽  
Recruitment Threshold ◽  
Eye Blink

1. The discharge of antidromically identified medial rectus and abducens motoneurons was recorded in restrained unanesthesized goldfish during spontaneous eye movements and in response to vestibular and optokinetic stimulation. 2. All medial rectus and abducens motoneurons exhibited a similar discharge pattern. A burst of spikes accompanied spontaneous saccades and fast phases during vestibular and optokinetic nystagmus in the ON-direction. Firing rate decreased for the same eye movements in the OFF-direction. All units showed a steady firing rate proportional to eye position beyond their recruitment threshold. 3. Motoneuronal position (ks) and velocity (rs) sensitivity for spontaneous eye movements were calculated from the slope of the rate-position and rate-velocity linear regression lines, respectively. The averaged ks and rs values of medial rectus motoneurons were higher than those of abducens motoneurons. The differences in motoneuronal sensitivity coupled with structural variations in the lateral versus the medial rectus muscle suggest that symmetric nasal and temporal eye movements are preserved by different motor unit composition. Although the abducens nucleus consists of distinct rostral and caudal subgroups, mean ks and rs values were not significantly different between the two populations. 4. Every abducens and medial rectus motoneuron fired an intense burst of spikes during its corresponding temporal or nasal activation phase of the "eye blink." This eye movement consisted of a sequential, rather than a synergic, contraction of both vertical and horizontal extraocular muscles. The eye blink could act neither as a protective reflex nor as a goal-directed eye movement because it could not be evoked in response to sensory stimuli. We propose a role for the blink in recentering eye position. 5. Motoneuronal firing rate after ON-directed saccades decreased exponentially before reaching the sustained discharge proportional to the new eye position. Time constants of the exponential decay ranged from 50 to 300 ms. Longer time constants after the saccade were associated with backward drifts of eye position and shorter time constants with onward drifts. These postsaccadic slide signals are suggested to encode the transition of eye position to the new steady level. 6. Motoneurons modulated sinusoidally in response to sinusoidal head rotation in the dark, but for a part of the cycle they went into cutoff, dependent on their eye position recruitment threshold. Eye position (kv) and velocity (rv) sensitivity during vestibular stimulation were measured at frequencies between 1/16 and 2 Hz. Motoneuronal time constants (tau v = rv/kv) decreased on the average by 25% with the frequency of vestibular stimulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Compensatory and Orienting Eye Movements Induced By Off-Vertical Axis Rotation (OVAR) in Monkeys

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 2445-2462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keisuke Kushiro ◽  
Mingjia Dai ◽  
Mikhail Kunin ◽  
Sergei B. Yakushin ◽  
Bernard Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Velocity Storage ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Rotational Axis ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Time Constants ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
Axis Rotation ◽  
Eye Velocity

Nystagmus induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) about a head yaw axis is composed of a yaw bias velocity and modulations in eye position and velocity as the head changes orientation relative to gravity. The bias velocity is dependent on the tilt of the rotational axis relative to gravity and angular head velocity. For axis tilts <15°, bias velocities increased monotonically with increases in the magnitude of the projected gravity vector onto the horizontal plane of the head. For tilts of 15–90°, bias velocity was independent of tilt angle, increasing linearly as a function of head velocity with gains of 0.7–0.8, up to the saturation level of velocity storage. Asymmetries in OVAR bias velocity and asymmetries in the dominant time constant of the angular vestibuloocular reflex (aVOR) covaried and both were reduced by administration of baclofen, a GABAB agonist. Modulations in pitch and roll eye positions were in phase with nose-down and side-down head positions, respectively. Changes in roll eye position were produced mainly by slow movements, whereas vertical eye position changes were characterized by slow eye movements and saccades. Oscillations in vertical and roll eye velocities led their respective position changes by ≈90°, close to an ideal differentiation, suggesting that these modulations were due to activation of the orienting component of the linear vestibuloocular reflex (lVOR). The beating field of the horizontal nystagmus shifted the eyes 6.3°/ g toward gravity in side down position, similar to the deviations observed during static roll tilt (7.0°/ g). This demonstrates that the eyes also orient to gravity in yaw. Phases of horizontal eye velocity clustered ∼180° relative to the modulation in beating field and were not simply differentiations of changes in eye position. Contributions of orientating and compensatory components of the lVOR to the modulation of eye position and velocity were modeled using three components: a novel direct otolith-oculomotor orientation, orientation-based velocity modulation, and changes in velocity storage time constants with head position re gravity. Time constants were obtained from optokinetic after-nystagmus, a direct representation of velocity storage. When the orienting lVOR was combined with models of the compensatory lVOR and velocity estimator from sequential otolith activation to generate the bias component, the model accurately predicted eye position and velocity in three dimensions. These data support the postulates that OVAR generates compensatory eye velocity through activation of velocity storage and that oscillatory components arise predominantly through lVOR orientation mechanisms.

Characterization and adaptive modification of the goldfish vestibuloocular reflex by sinusoidal and velocity step vestibular stimulation

1992 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 2003-2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Pastor ◽  
R. R. de la Cruz ◽  
R. Baker
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Constant Velocity ◽  
Directional Asymmetry ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Dynamic Component ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
Vor Adaptation ◽  
Eye Velocity ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. The normal and adapted vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) of goldfish was characterized by means of sinusoidal, velocity step, and position step head rotations about the vertical axis. VOR adaptation was induced by short-term, 1- to 4-h, presentation of visual and vestibular stimuli that altered the ratio of eye to head velocity. 2. The VOR response measured with sinusoidal oscillations in the dark was close to ideal compensatory values over 2 decades (1/32-2 Hz). Gain approximated unity, and phase, in relation to the head, was nearly 180 degrees. The VOR was linear within the range of head velocity tested (4-64 degrees/s). 3. Head velocity steps from 1/8 to 1 Hz produced steplike eye velocity profiles that could be divided into an early acceleration-related "dynamic" component and a later constant-velocity "sustained" period frequently separated by a sag at approximately 0.1-0.15 s from the initiation of eye movement. The sustained response exhibited no decay during the constant-velocity component of the step. 4. Higher temporal resolution of the dynamic response showed the adducting eye movement to have a shorter latency, faster rise time, and larger peak gain than the abducting eye movement. The characteristics of this directional asymmetry were similar for position steps and electrical stimulation of the vestibular nerve. However, the asymmetry was not observed during sinusoidal head rotation, the sustained component of the step response, or after electrical stimulation of the VIth and IIIrd nerves. We conclude that this directional asymmetry is of central origin and may be largely due to the parallel vestibular and abducens internuclear neuron pathways onto medial rectus motoneurons. 5. The VOR adaptation process for both higher and lower eye velocity exhibited an exponential time course with time constants of 55 and 45 min, respectively. After continuous sinusoidal training for 4 h, VOR gain reached an asymptotic level 5% away from perfect suppression in the low-gain training, but 19% away from the actual performance in the high-gain paradigm. The time constant for VOR gain reversal was 5 h, and an asymptotic level 40% less than performance was reached within 10 h. 6. Adapted VOR gain was symmetrical for both directions of eye movement measured either during sinusoidal rotation or the sustained part of the velocity step. VOR adaptation also produced a comparable gain change in the nasal and temporal directions of the dynamic component, but this reflected the asymmetric characteristics observed in the preadapted condition.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document