Role of striate cortex and superior colliculus in visual guidance of saccadic eye movements in monkeys

1977 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. W. Mohler ◽  
R. H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Stimulus Intensity ◽  
Macaca Mulatta ◽  
Striate Cortex ◽  
Visual Stimuli ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Guidance

1. We studied the effect of lesions placed in striate cortex or superior colliculus on the detection of visual stimuli and the accuracy of saccadic eye movements. The monkeys (Macaca mulatta) first learned to respond to a 0.25 degrees spot of light flashed for 150-200 ms in one part of the visual field while they were fixating in order to determine if they could detect the light. The monkeys also learned in a different task to make a saccade to the spot of light when the fixation point went out, and the accuracy of the saccades was measured. 2. Following a unilateral partial ablation of the striate cortex in two monkeys they could not detect the spot of light in the resulting scotoma or saccade to it. The deficit was only relative; if we increased the brightness of the stimulus from the usual 11 cd/m2 to 1,700 cd/m2 against a background of 1 cd/m2 the monkeys were able to detect and to make a saccade to the spot of light. 3. Following about 1 mo of practice on the detection and saccade tasks, the monkeys recovered the ability to detect the spots of light and to make saccades to them without gross errors (saccades made beyond an area of +/-3 average standard deviations). Lowering the stimulus intensity reinstated both the detection and saccadic errors...

Deficits in eye movements following frontal eye-field and superior colliculus ablations

1980 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1175-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. H. Schiller ◽  
S. D. True ◽  
J. L. Conway
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
The Other ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Saccade Velocity ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
Parallel Channels ◽  
Coil Method

1. This study investigated the effects of frontal eye-field and superior colliculus ablations on fixation patterns and saccadic eye movements. Monkeys were trained to pick apple pieces out of a multiple-slotted apple board while their heads were fixed. Eye movement records were obtained using predominantly the implanted search-coil method. 2. Both unilateral and bilateral frontal eye-field lesions produced only temporary deficits in eye movements. Following surgery monkeys tended to neglect the contralateral peripheral visual field and made fewer saccades to peripheral targets. Recovery was virtually completed in 2-4 wk. 3. Superior colliculus ablation reduced fixation accuracy, saccade frequency, and saccade velocity. These deficits showed little recovery with time. 4. Paired frontal eye-field and superior colliculus lesions produced dramatic deficits in visually triggered eye movements. Animals could no longer fixate their eyes on visual targets with any degree of accuracy. The range of eye movements was greatly reduced, as was the frequency and velocity of saccades. These deficits showed little recovery with time. 5. These results suggest that visually triggered saccadic eye movements are controlled by two parallel channels, one involving the superior colliculus and the other the frontal eye field.

Both striate cortex and superior colliculus contribute to visual properties of neurons in superior temporal polysensory area of macaque monkey

1986 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 1057-1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Bruce ◽  
R. Desimone ◽  
C. G. Gross
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Striate Cortex ◽  
Visual Stimuli ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Visual Responses ◽  
Stimulus Motion ◽  
Visual Hemifields ◽  
Visual Properties

Although the tectofugal system projects to the primate cerebral cortex by way of the pulvinar, previous studies have failed to find any physiological evidence that the superior colliculus influences visual activity in the cortex. We studied the relative contributions of the tectofugal and geniculostriate systems to the visual properties of neurons in the superior temporal polysensory area (STP) by comparing the effects of unilateral removal of striate cortex, the superior colliculus, or of both structures. In the intact monkey, STP neurons have large, bilateral receptive fields. Complete unilateral removal of striate cortex did not eliminate visual responses of STP neurons in the contralateral visual hemifield; rather, nearly half the cells still responded to visual stimuli in the hemifield contralateral to the lesion. Thus the visual properties of STP neurons are not completely dependent on the geniculostriate system. Unilateral striate lesions did affect the response properties of STP neurons in three ways. Whereas most STP neurons in the intact monkey respond similarly to stimuli in the two visual hemifields, responses to stimuli in the hemifield contralateral to the striate lesion were usually weaker than responses in the ipsilateral hemifield. Whereas the responses of many STP neurons in the intact monkey were selective for the direction of stimulus motion or for stimulus form, responses in the hemifield contralateral to the striate lesion were not selective for either motion or form. Whereas the median receptive field in the intact monkey extended 80 degrees into the contralateral visual field, the receptive fields of cells with responses in the contralateral field that survived the striate lesions had a median border that extended only 50 degrees into the contralateral visual field. Removal of both striate cortex and the superior colliculus in the same hemisphere abolished the responses of STP neurons to visual stimuli in the hemifield contralateral to the combined lesion. Nearly 80% of the cells still responded to visual stimuli in the hemifield ipsilateral to the lesion. Unilateral removal of the superior colliculus alone had only small effects on visual responses in STP. Receptive-field size and visual response strength were slightly reduced in the hemifield contralateral to the collicular lesion. As in the intact monkey, selectivity for stimulus motion or form were similar in the two visual hemifields. We conclude that both striate cortex and the superior colliculus contribute to the visual responses of STP neurons. Striate cortex is crucial for the movement and stimulus specificity of neurons in STP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Sensorimotor integration in the primate superior colliculus. I. Motor convergence

1987 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. Jay ◽  
D. L. Sparks
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Visual Stimuli ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
M Cells ◽  
Efferent Pathway ◽  
Saccadic Velocity ◽  
Visual Targets ◽  
Sensory Responses

Orienting movements of the eyes and head are made to both auditory and visual stimuli even though in the primary sensory pathways the locations of auditory and visual stimuli are encoded in different coordinates. This study was designed to differentiate between two possible mechanisms for sensory-to-motor transformation. Auditory and visual signals could be translated into common coordinates in order to share a single motor pathway or they could maintain anatomically separate sensory and motor routes for the initiation and guidance of orienting eye movements. The primary purpose of the study was to determine whether neurons in the superior colliculus (SC) that discharge before saccades to visual targets also discharge before saccades directed toward auditory targets. If they do, this would indicate that auditory and visual signals, originally encoded in different coordinates, have been converted into a single coordinate system and are sharing a motor circuit. Trained monkeys made saccadic eye movements to auditory or visual targets while the activity of visual-motor (V-M) cells and saccade-related burst (SRB) cells was monitored. The pattern of spike activity observed during trials in which saccades were made to visual targets was compared with that observed when comparable saccades were made to auditory targets. For most (57 of 59) V-M cells, sensory responses were observed only on visual trials. Auditory stimuli originating from the same region of space did not activate these cells. Yet, of the 72 V-M and SRB cells studied, 79% showed motor bursts prior to saccades to either auditory or visual targets. This finding indicates that visual and auditory signals, originally encoded in retinal and head-centered coordinates, respectively, have undergone a transformation that allows them to share a common efferent pathway for the generation of saccadic eye movements. Saccades to auditory targets usually have lower velocities than saccades of the same amplitude and direction made to acquire visual targets. Since fewer collicular cells are active prior to saccades to auditory targets, one determinant of saccadic velocity may be the number of collicular neurons discharging before a particular saccade.

scholarly journals Coordination of Pupil and Saccade Responses by the Superior Colliculus

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 919-932
Author(s):  
Chin-An Wang ◽  
Douglas P. Munoz
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Orienting Response ◽  
Pupil Dilation ◽  
Stimulation Frequency ◽  
Salient Stimulus

Abstract The appearance of a salient stimulus evokes saccadic eye movements and pupil dilation as part of the orienting response. Although the role of the superior colliculus (SC) in saccade and pupil dilation has been established separately, whether and how these responses are coordinated remains unknown. The SC also receives global luminance signals from the retina, but whether global luminance modulates saccade and pupil responses coordinated by the SC remains unknown. Here, we used microstimulation to causally determine how the SC coordinates saccade and pupil responses and whether global luminance modulates these responses by varying stimulation frequency and global luminance in male monkeys. Stimulation frequency modulated saccade and pupil responses, with trial-by-trial correlations between the two responses. Global luminance only modulated pupil, but not saccade, responses. Our results demonstrate an integrated role of the SC on coordinating saccade and pupil responses, characterizing luminance independent modulation in the SC, together elucidating the differentiated pathways underlying this behavior.

scholarly journals Perisaccadic perceptual mislocalization is different for upward saccades

2018 ◽  
Vol 120 (6) ◽  
pp. 3198-3216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikola Grujic ◽  
Nils Brehm ◽  
Cordula Gloge ◽  
Weijie Zhuo ◽  
Ziad M. Hafed
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Visual Analysis ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Conceptual Modeling ◽  
Visual Stimuli ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Lower Visual Field ◽  
Perceptual Stability ◽  
Upper Visual Field

Saccadic eye movements, which dramatically alter retinal images, are associated with robust perimovement perceptual alterations. Such alterations, thought to reflect brain mechanisms for maintaining perceptual stability in the face of saccade-induced retinal image disruptions, are often studied by asking subjects to localize brief stimuli presented around the time of horizontal saccades. However, other saccade directions are not usually explored. Motivated by recently discovered asymmetries in upper and lower visual field representations in the superior colliculus, a structure important for both saccade generation and visual analysis, we observed significant differences in perisaccadic perceptual alterations for upward saccades relative to other saccade directions. We also found that, even for purely horizontal saccades, perceptual alterations differ for upper vs. lower retinotopic stimulus locations. Our results, coupled with conceptual modeling, suggest that perisaccadic perceptual alterations might critically depend on neural circuits, such as superior colliculus, that asymmetrically represent the upper and lower visual fields. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Brief visual stimuli are robustly mislocalized around the time of saccades. Such mislocalization is thought to arise because oculomotor and visual neural maps distort space through foveal magnification. However, other neural asymmetries, such as upper visual field magnification in the superior colliculus, may also exist, raising the possibility that interactions between saccades and visual stimuli would depend on saccade direction. We confirmed this behaviorally by exploring and characterizing perisaccadic perception for upward saccades.

scholarly journals Reversible Inactivation of Monkey Superior Colliculus. I. Curvature of Saccadic Trajectory

1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 2082-2096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Aizawa ◽  
Robert H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Neuron Activity ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Reversible Inactivation ◽  
Intermediate Layers

Aizawa, Hiroshi and Robert H. Wurtz. Reversible inactivation of monkey superior colliculus. I. Curvature of saccadic trajectory. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 2082–2096, 1998. The neurons in the intermediate layers of the monkey superior colliculus (SC) that discharge before saccadic eye movements can be divided into at least two types, burst and buildup neurons, and the differences in their characteristics are compatible with different functional contributions of the two cell types. It has been suggested that a spread of activity across the population of the buildup neurons during saccade generation may contribute to the control of saccadic eye movements. The influence of any such spread should be on both the horizontal and vertical components of the saccade because the map of the movement fields on the SC is a two-dimensional one; it should affect the trajectory of saccade. The present experiments used muscimol injections to inactivate areas within the SC to determine the functional contribution of such a spread of activity on the trajectory of the saccades. The analysis concentrated on saccades made to areas of the visual field that should be affected primarily by alteration of buildup neuron activity. Muscimol injections produced saccades with altered trajectories; they became consistently curved after the injection, and successive saccades to the same targets had similar curvatures. The curved saccades showed changes in their direction and speed at the very beginning of the saccade, and for those saccades that reached the target, the direction of the saccade was altered near the end to compensate for the initially incorrect direction. Postinjection saccades had lower peak speeds, longer durations, and longer latencies for initiation. The changes in saccadic trajectories resulting from muscimol injections, along with the previous observations on changes in speed of saccades with such injections, indicate that the SC is involved in influencing the eye position during the saccade as well as at the end of the saccade. The changes in trajectory when injections were made more rostral in the SC than the most active burst neurons also are consistent with a contribution of the buildup neurons to the control of the eye trajectory. The results do not, however, support the hypothesis that the buildup neurons in the SC act as a spatial integrator.

scholarly journals Coordination of pupil and saccade responses by the superior colliculus

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chin-An Wang ◽  
Douglas P. Munoz
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Orienting Response ◽  
Pupil Dilation ◽  
Stimulation Frequency ◽  
Salient Stimulus

AbstractThe appearance of a salient stimulus evokes saccadic eye movements and pupil dilation as part of the orienting response. Although the role of the superior colliculus (SC) in saccade and pupil dilation has been established separately, whether and how these responses are coordinated remains unknown. The SC also receives global luminance signals from the retina, but whether global luminance modulates saccade and pupil responses coordinated by the SC remains unknown. Here, we used microstimulation to causally determine how the SC coordinates saccade and pupil responses, and whether global luminance modulates these responses by varying stimulation frequency and global luminance in male monkeys. Stimulation frequency modulated saccade and pupil responses, with trial-by-trial correlations between the two responses. Global luminance only modulated pupil, but not, saccade responses. Our results demonstrate an integrated role of the SC on coordinating saccade and pupil responses, characterizing luminance independent modulation in the SC, together elucidating the differentiated pathways underlying this behavior.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document