Importance of corpus callosum for visual receptive fields of single neurons in cat superior colliculus

1979 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Antonini ◽  
G. Berlucchi ◽  
C. A. Marzi ◽  
J. M. Sprague
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Corpus Callosum ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Vertical Meridian ◽  
Retinotectal Projections ◽  
Contralateral Eye ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Section of the posterior two-thirds of the corpus callosum eliminates almost completely the response of superior colliculus (SC) neurons to stimulation of the contralateral eye in split-chiasm cats. On the contrary, the responsiveness of SC neurons to stimulation of the contralateral eye is not abolished by a transection of the posterior and tectal commissures leaving the corpus callosum intact. The callosal section also reduces the number of SC receptive fields abutting the vertical meridian in the ipsilateral eye of split-chiasm cats. 2. In cats with intact optic pathways, a similar callosal section abolishes the SC representation of the ipsilateral visual field in the ipsilateral eye and also reduces the number of receptive fields adjoining the vertical meridian in the same eye. In the contralateral eye, the SC representation of the ipsilateral visual field is reduced in extension to about one-fifth of that seen in cats with intact commissures. 3. The results suggest that the corpus callosum is the main pathway for cross-midline communication of visual information at not only the cortical, but also the midbrain level. The corpus callosum may subserve this function because it contains uninterrupted crossed corticotectal projections or because it transmits visual information from one hemisphere to contralateral cortical areas projecting ipsilaterally to SC. The latter hypothesis is more likely but, in any case, the findings imply that the lack of interhemispheric transfer of visual learning in cats with a chiasmatic and callosal section may depend on a midline disconnection of both subcortical and cortical visual centers. 4. The corpus callosum is also responsible for the representation of the ipsilateral visual field of the ipsilateral eye in the cat SC. The SC representation of the ipsilateral visual field in the contralateral eye is due, in minimal part, to direct retinotectal connections from temporal retina and, for the largest part, to the corpus callosum. 5. Finally, the corpus callosum contributes to the representation of the contralateral visual field near the vertical meridian of the temporal retina in both split-chiasm and normal cats. This is probably due to the scarcity of direct retinotectal projections from this part of the retina and to their supplementation by corticotectal neurons influenced by the callosal afferents.

Indirect, across-the-midline retinotectal projections and representation of ipsilateral visual field in superior colliculus of the cat

1978 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Antonini ◽  
G. Berlucchi ◽  
J. M. Sprague
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Optic Chiasm ◽  
Anterior Portion ◽  
Vertical Meridian ◽  
Contralateral Eye ◽  
Rostral Portion

1. In agreement with previous work, we have found that the ipsilateral visual field is represented in an extensive rostral portion--from one-third to one-half--of the superior colliculus (SC) of the cat. This representation is binocular. The SC representation of the ipsilateral visual field can be mediated both directly, by crossed retinotectal connections originating from temporal hemiretina, and indirectly, by across-the-midline connections relaying visual information from one-half of the brain to contralateral SC. 2. In order to study the indirect, across-the-midline visual input to the SC, we have recorded responses of SC neurons to visual stimuli presented to either the ipsilateral or the contralateral eye of cats with a midsagittal splitting of the optic chiasm. Units driven by the ipsilateral eye, presumably through the direct retinotectal input and/or corticotectal connections from ipsilateral visual cortex, were found throughout the SC, except at its caudal pole, which normally receives fibers from the extreme periphery of the contralateral nasal hemiretina. Units driven by the contralateral eye, undoubtedly through an indirect across-the-midline connection, were found only in the anterior portion of the SC, in which is normally represented the ipsilateral visual field. Receptive fields in both ipsilateral and contralateral eye had properties typical of SC receptive fields in cats with intact optic pathways. 3. All units having a receptive field in the contralateral eye had also a receptive field in the ipsilateral eye; for each of these units, the receptive fields in both eyes invariably abutted the vertical meridian of the visual field. The receptive field in one eye had about the same elevation relative to the horizontal meridian and the same vertical extension as the receptive field in the other eye; the two receptive fields of each binocular unit matched each other at the vertical meridian and formed a combined receptive field straddling the vertical midline of the horopter...

Binocular neurons in the nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR) of the pigeon are selective for either translational or rotational visual flow

1990 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 489-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas R. Wylie ◽  
Barrie J. Frost
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Locomotor Behavior ◽  
Visual Flow ◽  
Electrophysiological Studies ◽  
Crucial Part ◽  
Stimulation Of

AbstractPrevious electrophysiological studies have shown that neurons in the nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR) of the pigeon respond best to wholefield stimuli moving slowly in a particular direction in the contralateral visual field. In this study, we have found that some nBOR neurons respond to wholefield stimulation of both eyes. These binocular neurons have spatially separate receptive fields in both visual fields. Some binocular neurons prefer the same direction of wholefield motion in both eyes, and thus respond best to wholefield visual motion which would result from translation movements of the bird, either ascent, descent, or forward and backward motion. Other neurons prefer opposite directions of wholefield motion in each eye and therefore respond optimally to wholefield visual motion simulating rotational movements of the bird, either roll or yaw. These binocular neurons may play a crucial part in the locomotor behavior of the pigeon by providing visual information distinguishing translational and rotational movements.

A role for the corpus callosum in visual area V4 of the macaque

1993 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Desimone ◽  
Jeffrey Moran ◽  
Stanley J. Schein ◽  
Mortimer Mishkin
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Corpus Callosum ◽  
Anterior Commissure ◽  
Color Constancy ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Optic Tract ◽  
Complete Suppression ◽  
Central Visual Field ◽  
Field Representation ◽  
Area V4

AbstractThe classically defined receptive fields of V4 cells are confined almost entirely to the contralateral visual field. However, these receptive fields are often surrounded by large, silent suppressive regions, and stimulating the surrounds can cause a complete suppression of response to a simultaneously presented stimulus within the receptive field. We investigated whether the suppressive surrounds might extend across the midline into the ipsilateral visual field and, if so, whether the surrounds were dependent on the corpus callosum, which has a widespread distribution in V4. We found that the surrounds of more than half of the cells tested in the central visual field representation of V4 crossed into the ipsilateral visual field, with some extending up to at least 16 deg from the vertical meridian. Much of this suppression from the ipsilateral field was mediated by the corpus callosum, as section of the callosum dramatically reduced both the strength and extent of the surrounds. There remained, however, some residual suppression that was not further reduced by addition of an anterior commissure lesion. Because the residual ipsilateral suppression was similar in magnitude and extent to that found following section of the optic tract contralateral to the V4 recording, we concluded that it was retinal in origin. Using the same techniques employed in V4, we also mapped the ipsilateral extent of surrounds in the foveal representation of VI in an intact monkey. Results were very similar to those in V4 following commissural or contralateral tract sections. The findings suggest that V4 is a central site for long-range interactions both within and across the two visual hemifields. Taken with previous work, the results are consistent with the notion that the large suppressive surrounds of V4 neurons contribute to the neural mechanisms of color constancy and figure-ground separation.

Responses of cells in the tail of the caudate nucleus during visual discrimination learning

1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 1083-1094 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. J. Brown ◽  
R. Desimone ◽  
M. Mishkin
Keyword(s):  
Caudate Nucleus ◽  
Visual Discrimination ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Visual Responses ◽  
Neuronal Responses ◽  
Association Learning ◽  
Visual Properties

1. The tail of the caudate nucleus and adjacent ventral putamen (ventrocaudal neostriatum) are major projection sites of the extrastriate visual cortex. Visual information is then relayed, directly or indirectly, to a variety of structures with motor functions. To test for a role of the ventrocaudal neostriatum in stimulus-response association learning, or habit formation, neuronal responses were recorded while monkeys performed a visual discrimination task. Additional data were collected from cells in cortical area TF, which serve as a comparison and control for the caudate data. 2. Two monkeys were trained to perform an asymmetrically reinforced go-no go visual discrimination. The stimuli were complex colored patterns, randomly assigned to be either positive or negative. The monkey was rewarded with juice for releasing a bar when a positive stimulus was presented, whereas a negative stimulus signaled that no reward was available and that the monkey should withhold its response. Neuronal responses were recorded both while the monkey performed the task with previously learned stimuli and while it learned the task with new stimuli. In some cases, responses were recorded during reversal learning. 3. There was no evidence that cells in the ventrocaudal neostriatum were influenced by the reward contingencies of the task. Cells did not fire preferentially to the onset of either positive or negative stimuli; neither did cells fire in response to the reward itself or in association with the motor response of the monkey. Only visual responses were apparent. 4. The visual properties of cells in these structures resembled those of cells in some of the cortical areas projecting to them. Most cells responded selectively to different visual stimuli. The degree of stimulus selectivity was assessed with discriminant analysis and was found to be quantitatively similar to that of inferior temporal cells tested with similar stimuli. Likewise, like inferior temporal cells, many cells in the ventrocaudal neostriatum had large, bilateral receptive fields. Some cells had "doughnut"-shaped receptive fields, with stronger responses in the periphery of both visual fields than at the fovea, similar to the fields of some cells in the superior temporal polysensory area. Although the absence of task-specific responses argues that ventrocaudal neostriatal cells are not themselves the mediators of visual learning in the task employed, their cortical-like visual properties suggest that they might relay visual information important for visuomotor plasticity in other structures. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The Detection of Orientation of Small Objects

Perception ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 59-59
Author(s):  
J M Zanker ◽  
M P Davey
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual System ◽  
Computer Simulations ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Human Performance ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Experimental Result ◽  
Orientation Tuning ◽  
Basic Question ◽  
Visual Stream

Visual information processing in primate cortex is based on a highly ordered representation of the surrounding world. In addition to the retinotopic mapping of the visual field, systematic variations of the orientation tuning of neurons are described electrophysiologically for the first stages of the visual stream. On the way to understanding the relation of position and orientation representation, in order to give an adequate account of cortical architecture, it will be an essential step to define the minimum spatial requirements for detection of orientation. We addressed the basic question of spatial limits for detecting orientation by comparing computer simulations of simple orientation filters with psychophysical experiments in which the orientation of small lines had to be detected at various positions in the visual field. At sufficiently high contrast levels, the minimum physical length of a line whose orientation can just be resolved is not constant when presented at various eccentricities, but covaries inversely with the cortical magnification factor. A line needs to span less than 0.2 mm on the cortical surface in order to be recognised as oriented, independently of the actual eccentricity at which the stimulus is presented. This seems to indicate that human performance for this task approaches the physical limits, requiring hardly more than approximately three input elements to be activated, in order to detect the orientation of a highly visible line segment. Combined with the estimates for receptive field sizes of orientation-selective filters derived from computer simulations, this experimental result may nourish speculations of how the rather local elementary process underlying orientation detection in the human visual system can be assembled to form much larger receptive fields of the orientation-sensitive neurons known to exist in the primate visual system.

Induced Roll Vection from Stimulation of the Central Visual Field

1987 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
George J. Andersen ◽  
Brian P. Dyre
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Postural Instability ◽  
Flight Simulation ◽  
Limited Area ◽  
Central Visual Field ◽  
Forward Motion ◽  
Self Motion ◽  
Stimulation Of

An important consideration for some types of flight simulation is that sufficient visual information be provided for a perception of self-motion. A general conclusion of earlier research is that peripheral stimulation (outside a 30 deg. diameter area of the central visual field) is necessary for perceived self-motion to occur. More recently Andersen and Braunstein (1985) demonstrated that induced self-motion could occur when visual information simulating forward motion of the observer was presented to a limited area of the central visual field. In the present study, the perception of induced roll vection (rotation about the line of sight) from visual stimulation of the central visual field was examined. Subjects viewed computer generated displays that simulated observer motion relative to a volume of randomly positioned points. Two variables were examined: 1) the presence or absence of a simulated forward motion, and 2) the presence of a 15 deg. or 30 deg. sinusoidal roll motion. It was found that: 1) induced roll vection occurred with stimulation restricted to a 10 deg. diameter area of the central visual field; 2) greater postural instability occurred for displays with a 30 deg. roll as compared to a 15 deg. roll; and 3) significantly greater postural instability occurred along the X-axis (left/right) as compared to the Y-axis (front/back). The implications of this research for flight simulation will be discussed.

Visual-field map in the transcallosal sending zone of area 17 in the cat

1991 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. R. Payne
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Horseradish Peroxidase ◽  
Corpus Callosum ◽  
Constant Width ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Retrograde Transport ◽  
Area 17 ◽  
Horizontal Meridian ◽  
Contralateral Hemisphere ◽  
Opposite Hemisphere

AbstractThe representation of the visual field in the part of area 17 containing neurons that project axons across the corpus callosum to the contralateral hemisphere was defined in the cat. Of 1424 sites sampled along 77 electrode tracks, 768 proved to be in the callosal sending zone, which was identified by retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase that had been deposited in the opposite hemisphere. The results show that the callosal sending zone has a fairly constant width of between 3 and 4 mm at most levels in area 17. However, the representation of the contralateral field at the different elevations of the visual field is not equal in this zone. The zone represents positions within 4 deg of the midline at the 0-deg horizontal meridian, and positions out to 15-deg azimuths in the upper hemifield and out to positions of 25-deg azimuth in the lower hemifield. The shape of the representation is approximately mirror-symmetric about the horizontal meridian, although there is a greater extent in the lower hemifield, which can be accounted for by the greater range of elevations (>60 deg) represented there compared with the upper hemifield (-40 deg). The representation in the sending zone of one hemisphere matches that present in the area 17/18 transition zone, which receives the bulk of transcallosal projections, in the opposite hemisphere. The observations on the sending zone show that callosal connections of area 17 are concerned with a vertical hour-glass-shaped region of the visual field centered on the midline. The observations suggest that in addition to interactions between neurons concerned with positions immediately adjacent to the midline, there are positions, especially high and low in the visual field, where interactions can occur between neurons that have receptive fields displaced some distance from the midline.

Responses of pigeon vestibulocerebellar neurons to optokinetic stimulation. II. The 3-dimensional reference frame of rotation neurons in the flocculus

1993 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 2647-2659 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. R. Wylie ◽  
B. J. Frost
Keyword(s):  
Dimensional Space ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Horizontal Axis ◽  
Monocular Stimulation ◽  
Contralateral Eye ◽  
Ipsilateral Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. The complex spike activity of Purkinje cells in the flocculus in response to rotational flowfields was recorded extracellularly in anesthetized pigeons. 2. The optokinetic stimulus was produced by a rotating “planetarium projector.” A light source was placed in the center of a tin cylinder, which was pierced with numerous small holes. A pen motor oscillated the cylinder about its long axis. This apparatus was placed above the bird's head and the resultant rotational flow-field was projected onto screens that surrounded the bird on all four sides. The axis of rotation of the planetarium could be oriented to any position in three-dimensional space. 3. Two types of responses were found: vertical axis (VA; n = 43) neurons responded best to visual rotation about the vertical axis, and H-135i neurons (n = 34) responded best to rotation about a horizontal axis. The preferred orientation of the horizontal axis was at approximately 135 degrees ipsilateral azimuth. VA neurons were excited by rotation about the vertical axis producing forward (temporal to nasal) and backward motion in the ipsilateral and contralateral eyes, respectively, and were inhibited by rotation in the opposite direction. H-135i neurons in the left flocculus were excited by counterclockwise rotation about the 135 degrees ipsilateral horizontal axis and were inhibited by clockwise motion. Thus, the VA and H-135i neurons, respectively, encode visual flowfields resulting from head rotations stimulating the ipsilateral horizontal and ipsilateral anterior semicircular canals. 4. Sixty-seven percent of VA and 80% of H-135i neurons had binocular receptive fields, although for most binocular cells the ipsilateral eye was dominant. Binocular stimulation resulted in a greater depth of modulation than did monocular stimulation of the dominant eye for 69% of the cells. 5. Monocular stimulation of the VA neurons revealed that the best axis for the contralateral eye was tilted back 11 degrees, on average, to the best axis for ipsilateral stimulation. For the H-135i neurons, the best axes for monocular stimulation of the two eyes were approximately the same. 6. By stimulating circumscribed portions of the monocular receptive fields of the H-135i neurons with alternating upward and downward largefield motion, it was revealed that the contralateral receptive fields were bipartite. Upward motion was preferred in the anterior 45 degrees of the contralateral field, and downward motion, was preferred in the central 90 degrees of the contralateral visual field.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Visual Stimulus–Dependent Changes in Interhemispheric EEG Coherence in Ferrets

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 3082-3094 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. Kiper ◽  
M. G. Knyazeva ◽  
L. Tettoni ◽  
G. M. Innocenti
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Corpus Callosum ◽  
Experimental Validation ◽  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Eeg Coherence ◽  
Vertical Meridian ◽  
Callosal Connections ◽  
Interhemispheric Coherence ◽  
Cortical Connections ◽  
Visual Areas

In recent years, the analysis of the coherence between signals recorded from the scalp [electroencephalographic (EEG) coherence] has been used to assess the functional properties of cortico-cortical connections, both in animal models and in humans. However, the experimental validation of this technique is still scarce. Therefore we applied it to the study of the callosal connections between the visual areas of the two hemispheres, because this particular set of cortico-cortical connections can be activated in a selective way by visual stimuli. Indeed, in primary and in low-order secondary visual areas, callosal axons interconnect selectively regions, which represent a narrow portion of the visual field straddling the vertical meridian and, within these regions, neurons that prefer the same stimulus orientation. Thus only isooriented stimuli located near the vertical meridian are expected to change interhemispheric coherence by activating callosal connections. Finally, if such changes are found and are indeed mediated by callosal connections, they should disappear after transection of the corpus callosum. We perfomed experiments on seven paralyzed and anesthetized ferrets, recording their cortical activity with epidural electrodes on areas 17/18, 19, and lateral suprasylvian, during different forms of visual stimulation. As expected, we found that bilateral iso-oriented stimuli near the vertical meridian, or extending across it, caused a significant increase in interhemispheric coherence in the EEG beta-gamma band. Stimuli with different orientations, stimuli located far from the vertical meridian, as well as unilateral stimuli failed to affect interhemispheric EEG coherence. The stimulus-induced increase in coherence disappeared after surgical transection of the corpus callosum. The results suggest that the activation of cortico-cortical connections can indeed be revealed as a change in EEG coherence. The latter can therefore be validly used to investigate the functionality of cortico-cortical connections.

Unilateral paralytic strabismus in the adult cat induces plastic changes in interocular disparity along the visual midline: Contribution of the corpus callosum

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 325-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. MILLERET ◽  
P. BUSER ◽  
L. WATROBA
Keyword(s):  
Corpus Callosum ◽  
Ocular Dominance ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Orientation Selectivity ◽  
Interhemispheric Connectivity ◽  
Paralytic Strabismus ◽  
Adult Cat ◽  
Contralateral Eye ◽  
Surgically Induced ◽  
Cortical Distribution

Neurones activated through the corpus callosum (CC) in the cat visual cortex are known to be almost entirely located at the 17/18 border. They are orientation selective and display receptive fields (RFs) distributed along the central vertical meridian of the visual field (“visual midline”). Most of these cells are binocular, and many of them are activated both from the contralateral eye through the CC, and from the ipsilateral eyeviathe direct retino-geniculo-cortical (GC) pathway. These two pathways do not carry exactly the same information, leading to interocular disparity between pairs of RFs along the visual midline. Recently, we have demonstrated that a few weeks of unilateral paralytic strabismus surgically induced at adulthood does not alter the cortical distribution of these units but leads to a loss of their orientation selectivity and an increase of their RF size, mainly toward the ipsilateral hemifield when transcallosally activated (Watroba et al., 2001). To investigate interocular disparity, here we compared these RF changes to those occurring in the same neurones when activated through the ipsilateral direct GC route. The 17/18 transition zone and the bordering medial region within A17 were distinguished, as they display different interhemispheric connectivity. In these strabismics, some changes were noticed, but were basically identical in both recording zones. Ocular dominance was not altered, nor was the spatial distribution of the RFs with respect to the visual midline, nor the amplitude of position disparity between pairs of RFs. On the other hand, strabismus induced a loss of orientation selectivity regardless of whether neurones were activated directly or through the CC. Both types of RFs also widened, but in opposite directions with respect to the visual midline. This led to changes in incidences of the different types of position disparity. The overlap between pairs of RFs also increased. Based on these differences, we suggest that the contribution of the CC to binocular vision along the midline in the adult might be modulated through several intrinsic cortical mechanisms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document