Parabrachial area and nucleus raphe magnus-induced modulation of nociceptive and nonnociceptive trigeminal subnucleus caudalis neurons activated by cutaneous or deep inputs

1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 2430-2445 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Y. Chiang ◽  
J. W. Hu ◽  
B. J. Sessle
Keyword(s):  
Spontaneous Activity ◽  
Inhibitory Effects ◽  
Conditioning Stimulation ◽  
Nucleus Raphe Magnus ◽  
Nociceptive Neurons ◽  
Nociceptive Responses ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Raphe Magnus ◽  
Trigeminal Subnucleus Caudalis ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. The aim of this study was to test whether parabrachial area (PBA) stimulation exerts inhibitory influences on the spontaneous activity and responses evoked by skin and deep afferent inputs in trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (Vc) neurons, and to compare these effects with those of nucleus raphe magnus (NRM) stimulation. A total of 92 nonnociceptive and nociceptive Vc neurons was recorded in urethan/alpha-chloralose-anesthetized rats. Each neuron was functionally classified as low-threshold mechanoceptive (LTM), wide dynamic range (WDR), nociceptive-specific (NS), nociceptive convergent with both skin and deep inputs (S+D), or deep nociceptive (D); the LTM neurons could be subdivided as rapidly adapting (RA) or slowly adapting (SA). Conditioning stimulation was applied to histologically verified sites in PBA and NRM. 2. The spontaneous or evoked activity of all classes of neurons could be inhibited by PBA as well as by NRM stimulation, but generally the incidence and magnitude of inhibition were lower for the LTM neurons. Occasionally, facilitation of neuronal activity was also produced by PBA and NRM stimulation. 3. The spontaneous activity of 11 LTM neurons (6 RA, 5 SA), 13 nociceptive neurons (6 WDR, 7 NS), and 5 D neurons was tested with stimulation of PBA or NRM or both. LTM spontaneous activity was more significantly inhibited by NRM stimulation than by PBA stimulation, whereas both NRM and PBA stimulation had similar and significant inhibitory effects on NS, WDR, and D neurons. 4. The evoked nonnociceptive responses of 28 LTM neurons (16 RA, 12 SA) and of 6 WDR neurons were also tested with stimulation of PBA or NRM or both. The magnitudes of inhibition of the responses produced by PBA conditioning stimulation were statistically significantly less than those induced by NRM conditioning stimulation. 5. The cutaneous and deep nociceptive responses of cutaneous nociceptive neurons (9 NS, 19 WDR) and seven D neurons, respectively, were also tested with PBA and NRM stimulation. There was a significant difference in potency between PBA- and NRM-induced inhibition, but no difference in the magnitude of inhibitory effects among NS, WDR, and D neurons. For both PBA and NRM conditioning stimulation, graded increases in intensities of stimulation produced linear increases in inhibitory effects on nociceptive responses; an increase in stimulation frequency from 5 to 400 Hz also produced increases in inhibition of the nociceptive responses. 6. In five S+D nociceptive convergent neurons, the responses elicited by deep inputs were more powerfully inhibited by PBA stimulation than those elicited by cutaneous inputs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Nucleus raphe magnus modulation of response of rat dorsal horn neurons to unmyelinated fiber inputs: partial involvement of serotonergic pathways

1980 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1039-1057 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Rivot ◽  
A. Chaouch ◽  
J. M. Besson
Keyword(s):  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Radiant Heat ◽  
Inhibitory Effects ◽  
Halothane Anesthesia ◽  
Nucleus Raphe Magnus ◽  
Dorsal Horn Neurons ◽  
C Fibers ◽  
Raphe Magnus ◽  
Freely Moving ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. In the rat under N2O-halothane anesthesia, stimulation of the nucleus raphe magnus (NRM) with stimulus parameters similar to those used to obtain analgesia in freely moving animals strongly inhibits the responses of dorsal horn convergent neurons due to A-delta- and C-afferents. 2. Responses to noxious radiant heat were also depressed, and pronounced post-effects were frequently observed. 3. Comparison between coupled sites of stimulation in NRM and in adjacent bulbar reticular formation (BRF) on responses to C-fibers revealed the preeminent effects of NRM; these were systematically encountered (93% of neurons), much more pronounced, and of longer duration. 4. The latency of these inhibitory effects (around 20 ms) suggests the participation of myelinated axons in such descending action and, consequently, we question the involvement of unmyelinated serotonergic fibers. 5. However, descending inhibitory influences from NRM on responses to C-fibers are reduced after 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) depletion by p-chlorophenylalinine (pCPA), thus demonstrating the implication of both serotonergic and nonserotonergic pathways. 6. In addition, after pCPA pretreatment, long-lasting and sustained excitatory effects from NRM were observed in 35% of convergent neurons; their possible origin is discussed.

Descending inhibitory influences from periaqueductal gray, nucleus raphe magnus, and adjacent reticular formation. II. Effects on medullary dorsal horn nociceptive and nonnociceptive neurons

1983 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 948-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. O. Dostrovsky ◽  
Y. Shah ◽  
B. G. Gray
Keyword(s):  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Periaqueductal Gray ◽  
Nucleus Raphe Magnus ◽  
Nucleus Reticularis ◽  
Medullary Dorsal Horn ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Raphe Magnus ◽  
Somatosensory Responses ◽  
Wdr Neurons

1. This study examined the inhibitory effects elicited by brain stem stimulation on the somatosensory responses of trigeminal medullary dorsal horn (subnucleus caudalis of the spinal trigeminal nucleus) neurons. Single-unit extracellular recordings were obtained in chloralose-anesthetized cats. Neurons were classified as wide dynamic range (WDR), nociceptive specific (NS), or low-threshold mechanoreceptive (LTM). Conditioning stimuli were delivered to the periaqueductal gray (PAG), nucleus cuneiformis (CU), nucleus raphe magnus (NRM), nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis (NGC), and nucleus reticularis magnocellularis (NMC). 2. Over 97% of the neurons tested could be inhibited by stimulation in all regions except PAG. Stimulation in the PAG inhibited 91% of the neurons tested. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of inhibition of WDR and NS nociceptive (noci) neurons and the LTM nonnociceptive (nonnoci) neurons. 3. Mean stimulation intensities necessary to produce inhibition were determined for each neuron from each stimulation site. The current thresholds necessary to inhibit the responses of noci neurons were found to be significantly lower, on the average, than those of nonnoci neurons at stimulation sites in the PAG, CU, and NGC. 4. Inhibition of the responses of WDR neurons required a lower mean current than for NS neurons but was statistically significant only for PAG and NGC. Thresholds for inhibiting the responses of NS neurons were similar to those for inhibiting the responses of LTM neurons for all regions except CU, where LTM thresholds were markedly but not significantly higher. 5. Stimulation thresholds were found to be lowest in NMC, while in NGC, NRM, and CU they were all similar and slightly higher. Stimulation in the PAG required the highest currents to produce inhibition. 6. These results indicate that stimulation in NRM and PAG not only inhibits the responses of noci neurons but also those of nonnoci neurons. Furthermore, stimulation in reticular regions adjacent to NRM and PAG is frequently even more effective in inhibiting the responses of both noci and nonnoci neurons. In addition, WDR neurons are more effectively inhibited than NS or LTM neurons. These results are compared with those obtained using similar methods in cat lumbar dorsal horn.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document