nucleus reticularis
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

288
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

55
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2019 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinxu Liu ◽  
Gajanan P. Shelkar ◽  
Fabao Zhao ◽  
Rasmus P. Clausen ◽  
Shashank M. Dravid

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura C. Grandi ◽  
Alain Kaelin-Lang ◽  
Gergely Orban ◽  
Wei Song ◽  
Agnese Salvadè ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 223 (6) ◽  
pp. 2733-2751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Hormigo ◽  
Dolores E. López ◽  
Antonio Cardoso ◽  
Gladys Zapata ◽  
Jacqueline Sepúlveda ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura M. J. Fernandez ◽  
Chiara Pellegrini ◽  
Gil Vantomme ◽  
Elidie Béard ◽  
Anita Lüthi ◽  
...  

Neuroscience ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 337 ◽  
pp. 66-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Härtig ◽  
Simon Appel ◽  
Anne Suttkus ◽  
Jens Grosche ◽  
Dominik Michalski

2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 849-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayu Takahashi ◽  
Yuriko Sugiuchi ◽  
Yoshikazu Shinoda

The caudal fastigial nucleus (FN) is known to be related to the control of eye movements and projects mainly to the contralateral reticular nuclei where excitatory and inhibitory burst neurons for saccades exist [the caudal portion of the nucleus reticularis pontis caudalis (NRPc), and the rostral portion of the nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis (NRG) respectively]. However, the exact reticular neurons targeted by caudal fastigioreticular cells remain unknown. We tried to determine the target reticular neurons of the caudal FN and superior colliculus (SC) by recording intracellular potentials from neurons in the NRPc and NRG of anesthetized cats. Neurons in the rostral NRG received bilateral, monosynaptic excitation from the caudal FNs, with contralateral predominance. They also received strong monosynaptic excitation from the rostral and caudal contralateral SC, and disynaptic excitation from the rostral ipsilateral SC. These reticular neurons with caudal fastigial monosynaptic excitation were not activated antidromically from the contralateral abducens nucleus, but most of them were reticulospinal neurons (RSNs) that were activated antidromically from the cervical cord. RSNs in the caudal NRPc received very weak monosynaptic excitation from only the contralateral caudal FN, and received either monosynaptic excitation only from the contralateral caudal SC, or monosynaptic and disynaptic excitation from the contralateral caudal and ipsilateral rostral SC, respectively. These results suggest that the caudal FN helps to control also head movements via RSNs targeted by the SC, and these RSNs with SC topographic input play different functional roles in head movements.


2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 2326-2338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene M. Martin ◽  
Constantine Pavlides ◽  
Donald Pfaff

The connectivity of large neurons of the nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis (NRGc) in the medullary reticular formation potentially allows both for the integration of stimuli, in several modalities, that would demand immediate action, and for coordinated activation of cortical and motoric activity. We have simultaneously recorded cortical local field potentials, neck muscle electromyograph (EMG), and the neural activity of medullary NRGc neurons in unrestrained, unanesthetized rats to determine whether the activity of the NRGc is consistent with the modulation of general arousal. We observed excitatory responses of individual NRGc neurons to all modalities tested: tactile, visual, auditory, vestibular, and olfactory. Excitation was directly linked to increases in neck muscle EMG amplitude and corresponded with increases in the power of fast oscillations (30 to 80 Hz) of cortical activity and decreases in the power of slow oscillations (2 to 8 Hz). Because these reticular formation neurons can respond to broad ranges of stimuli with increased firing rates associated with the initiation of behavioral responses, we infer that they are part of an elementary “first responder” CNS arousal mechanism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document