Striking Differences in Transmission of Corticospinal Excitation to Upper Limb Motoneurons in Two Primate Species

There is considerable debate as to the relative importance, for cortical control of upper limb movements, of direct cortico-motoneuronal (CM) versus indirect, propriospinal transmission of corticospinal excitation to cervical motoneurons. In the cat, which has no CM connections, a significant proportion of corticospinal excitation reaches forelimb motoneurons via a system of C3–C4propriospinal neurons (PN). In contrast, in the macaque monkey most motoneurons receive direct CM connections, and, under the same experimental conditions as in the cat, there is little evidence for PN transmission. We have investigated corticospinal transmission in the New World squirrel monkey ( Saimiri sciureus) because its CM projections are weaker than in the macaque. Intracellular recordings were made from motoneurons identified from the ulnar, median, and deep radial (DR) nerves in four adult squirrel monkeys under chloralose anesthesia and neuromuscular paralysis. Responses to stimulation of the contralateral medullary pyramid were recorded before and after a lesion to the dorsolateral funiculus (DLF) at C5, designed to interrupt direct corticospinal inputs to the lower cervical segments and unmask PN-mediated effects. This lesion greatly reduced the proportion of motoneurons showing either CM EPSPs or disynaptic IPSPs, but the proportion showing late EPSPs with segmental latencies beyond the monosynaptic range, evoked by repetitive but not single PT stimuli, was unaffected: 23 of 29 motoneurons (79%) before and 32 of 37 (86%) after the lesion; 41% of these late EPSPs had strictly disynaptic latencies after the lesion, only 14% before. These results are in striking contrast to the macaque (late EPSPs in only 18% of motoneurons before a C5 lesion, 19% after it). Transmission of the late EPSPs via C3–C4 PNs in the squirrel monkey was indicated by their absence after an additional C2 DLF lesion. Nearly all tested motoneurons also responded with short latency EPSPs to stimulation in the ipsilateral lateral reticular nucleus. By analogy with the cat, these EPSPs probably reflect antidromic activation of ascending collaterals of C3–C4 PNs with monosynaptic connections to motoneurons; the EPSPs were significantly smaller than in the cat but larger than in the macaque. These results suggest that the positive correlation across species between more advanced hand function and the strength of the CM system is accompanied by a negative correlation between hand function and the strength of the PN system. We hypothesize that in primates with more advanced hand function, the CM system effectively replaces PN-mediated control. This would include a contribution to the control of reaching movements, which are said to be specifically under the control of the PN system in the cat, and we speculate that these differences may be related to the degree of dexterity exhibited by the different species. This interpretation of the results predicts that in man, where the CM system is highly developed, the PN system is unlikely to be responsible for significant transmission of cortical commands to upper limb motoneurons.