scholarly journals Cholangiocarcinoma: Has There been Any Progress?

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Meza-Junco ◽  
Aldo J Montano-Loza ◽  
Mang Ma ◽  
Winnie Wong ◽  
Michael B Sawyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽  
Poor Survival ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Micrometastatic Disease

Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary hepatic tumour after hepatocellular carcinoma. Primary sclerosing cholangitis is one of the most commonly recognized risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma; however, approximately 90% of patients have no identifiable risk factors. Extrahepatic type is its most common presentation. Cholangiocarcinoma is considered to be a devastating disease, with a poor survival rate and few therapeutic options. Although surgical resection has been considered the best treatment option for localized cholangiocarcinoma, local recurrences of this cancer are very common, and imply persistent micrometastatic disease in lymph nodes or at surgical margins, even after extended surgical resection. Consequently, the five-year survival rate after attempted curative resection is only 20% to 40%. Early studies of liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma did not show a survival benefit and, currently, this tumour is considered to be an absolute contraindication for liver transplantation in most transplant centres worldwide. Recently, neoadjuvant chemoradiation in combination with liver transplantation for highly selected patients with cholangiocarcinoma has shown impressive results, with five-year survival rates at approximately 76% to 82% – similar to other standard indications for liver transplantation, such as hepatocellular carcinoma or hepatitis C-induced cirrhosis. However, this success of liver transplantation applies to only a subset of patients and most of the data originated from a single centre. Wider application of this strategy, especially for patients with potentially resectable disease, will require validation by other centres.

scholarly journals Surgical Resection Significantly Promotes the Overall Survival of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei-Min Hsieh ◽  
Hung-Yu Lin ◽  
Chao-Ming Hung ◽  
Gin-Ho Lo ◽  
I-Cheng Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Hbv Infection ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis

Abstract Background: The benefits of surgical resection (SR) for various Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unclear. We investigated the risk factors of overall survival (OS) and survival benefits of SR over nonsurgical treatments in patients with HCC of various BCLC stages.Methods: Overall, 2316 HCC patients were included, and their clinicopathological data and OS were recorded. OS was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed.Results: In total, 66 (2.8%), 865 (37.4%), 575 (24.8%) and 870 (35.0%) patients had BCLC stage 0, A, B, and C disease, respectively. Furthermore, 1302 (56.2%) of all patients, and 37 (56.9%), 472 (54.6%), 313 (54.4%) and 480 (59.3%) of patients with BCLC stage 0, A, B, and C disease, respectively, died. The median follow-up duration time was 20 (range 0-96) months for the total cohort and was subdivided into 52 (8-96), 32 (1-96), 19 (0-84), and 12 (0-79) months for BCLC stages 0, A, B, and C cohorts, respectively. The risk factors for OS were 1) SR and cirrhosis; 2) SR, cirrhosis, and Child-Pugh (C-P) class; 3) SR, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and C-P class; and 4) SR, HBV infection, and C-P class for the BCLC stage 0, A, B, and C cohorts, respectively. Compared to non-SR treatment, SR resulted in significantly higher survival rates in all cohorts. The 5-year OS rates for SR vs non-SR were 44.0% vs 28.7%, 72.2% vs 42.6%, 42.6% vs 36.2, 44.6% vs 23.5%, and 41.4% vs 15.3% (all p-values<0.05) in the total and BCLC stage 0, A, B, and C cohorts, respectively. After PSM, SR resulted in significantly higher survival rates compared to non-SR treatment in various BCLC stages.Conclusion: SR conferred significant survival benefits to patients with HCC of various BCLC stages and should be considered a recommended treatment for select HCC patients, especially patients with BCLC stage B and C disease.

Impact of up-to-seven criteria and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in liver transplantation for patients who received pretreatment for hepatocellular carcinoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14536-e14536
Author(s):  
Tomoharu Yoshizumi ◽  
Toru Ikegami ◽  
Shohei Yoshiya ◽  
Takashi Motomura ◽  
Yohei Mano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Tumor Recurrence ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio

e14536 Background: There is currently no consensus on how to manage patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) while awaiting liver transplantation (LT). The guideline published in UK states that locoregional therapy should be considered for all listed patients with HCC. Living donor LT (LDLT) is a choice for treating HCC patients in organ shortage era. The aim of the present study is to clarify the risk factors of tumor recurrence after LDLT in patients who had received pre-transplant treatments (pre-Tx) for HCC. Methods: One hundred two adult patients (39 females and 63 males) who had undergone LDLT due to end-stage liver disease with recurrent HCC after pre-Tx were enrolled. The primary end-point of this study was HCC recurrence after LDLT. Recurrence-free survival rates after LDLT were calculated. Risk factors of tumor recurrence were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 89.4%, 80.7%, and 78.8%, respectively. Seventy-four of 102 patients underwent pre-Tx more than twice. Moreover, the times of pre-Tx, the interval between the first treatment and LDLT, and the interval between the last treatment and LDLT did not affect the outcome of LDLT. On univariate analysis, the factors affecting recurrence-free survival were exceeding the up-to-seven criteria (p<0.0001), exceeding the Kyushu University criteria (p<0.0001), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 4 (p=0.0001), Alpha-fetoprotein > 400 ng/ml (p<0.0001), and bilobar tumor distribution (p=0.047). A multivariate analysis identified independent risk factors for post-LDLT tumor recurrence were exceeding the up-to-seven criteria (p=0.001) and NLR > 4 (p=0.002). The 1- and 3-year recurrence-free survival rates in the recipients with exceeding the up-to-seven criteria and NLR > 4 were 30.0% and 15.0%, respectively. Conclusions: The kind or duration of pre-Tx did not affect the outcome of LDLT, but LDLT should not be performed for the patients with exceeding the up-to-seven criteria and NLR more than 4 after pre-Tx for HCC to prevent tumor recurrence.

scholarly journals RISK FACTORS FOR POOR SURVIVAL AFTER RECURRENCE OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA AFTER LIVER TRANSPLANTATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (S3) ◽  
pp. S520-S520
Author(s):  
Jinsoo Rhu ◽  
Jae-Won Joh ◽  
Jong Man Kim ◽  
Gyu-Seong Choi ◽  
Min Jeong Kim
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Poor Survival

scholarly journals Surgical resection significantly promotes the overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaw-Sen Chen ◽  
Pei-Min Hsieh ◽  
Hung-Yu Lin ◽  
Chao-Ming Hung ◽  
Gin-Ho Lo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Hbv Infection ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis

Abstract Background The benefits of surgical resection (SR) for various Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unclear. We investigated the risk factors of overall survival (OS) and survival benefits of SR over nonsurgical treatments in patients with HCC of various BCLC stages. Methods Overall, 2316 HCC patients were included, and their clinicopathological data and OS were recorded. OS was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed. Results In total, 66 (2.8%), 865 (37.4%), 575 (24.8%) and 870 (35.0%) patients had BCLC stage 0, A, B, and C disease, respectively. Furthermore, 1302 (56.2%) of all patients, and 37 (56.9%), 472 (54.6%), 313 (54.4%) and 480 (59.3%) of patients with BCLC stage 0, A, B, and C disease, respectively, died. The median follow-up duration time was 20 (range 0–96) months for the total cohort and was subdivided into 52 (8–96), 32 (1–96), 19 (0–84), and 12 (0–79) months for BCLC stages 0, A, B, and C cohorts, respectively. The risk factors for OS were (1) SR and cirrhosis; (2) SR, cirrhosis, and Child–Pugh (C–P) class; (3) SR, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and C–P class; and (4) SR, HBV infection, and C–P class for the BCLC stage 0, A, B, and C cohorts, respectively. Compared to non-SR treatment, SR resulted in significantly higher survival rates in all cohorts. The 5-year OS rates for SR vs. non-SR were 44.0% versus 28.7%, 72.2% versus 42.6%, 42.6% versus 36.2, 44.6% versus 23.5%, and 41.4% versus 15.3% (all P values < 0.05) in the total and BCLC stage 0, A, B, and C cohorts, respectively. After PSM, SR resulted in significantly higher survival rates compared to non-SR treatment in various BCLC stages. Conclusions SR conferred significant survival benefits to patients with HCC of various BCLC stages and should be considered a recommended treatment for select HCC patients, especially patients with BCLC stage B and C disease.

scholarly journals LIVER TRANSPLANTATION FOR CARCINOMA HEPATOCELLULAR IN SÃO PAULO: 414 CASES BY THE MILAN/BRAZIL CRITERIA

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 240-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Pilotto D. SÁ ◽  
◽  
Fernando P. P. VICENTINE ◽  
Alcides A. SALZEDAS-NETTO ◽  
Carla Adriana Loureiro de MATOS ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Vascular Invasion ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Good Survival ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Carcinoma Hepatocellular

ABSTRACT Background: The criterion of Milan (CM) has been used as standard for indication of liver transplantation (LTx) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide for nearly 20 years. Several centers have adopted criteria expanded in order to increase the number of patients eligible to liver transplantation, while maintaining good survival rates. In Brazil, since 2006, the criterion of Milan/Brazil (CMB), which disregards nodules <2 cm, is adopted, including patients with a higher number of small nodules. Aim: To evaluate the outcome of liver transplantation within the CMB. Methods: The medical records of patients with HCC undergoing liver transplantation in relation to recurrence and survival by comparing CM and CMB, were analyzed. Results: 414 LTx for HCC, the survival at 1 and 5 years was 84.1 and 72.7%. Of these, 7% reached the CMB through downstaging, with survival at 1 and 5 years of 93.1 and 71.9%. The CMB patient group that exceeded the CM (8.6%) had a survival rate of 58.1% at five years. There was no statistical difference in survival between the groups CM, CMB and downstaging. Vascular invasion (p<0.001), higher nodule size (p=0.001) and number of nodules >2 cm (p=0.028) were associated with relapse. The age (p=0.001), female (p<0.001), real MELD (p<0.001), vascular invasion (p=0.045) and number of nodes >2 cm (p<0.014) were associated with worse survival. Conclusions: CMB increased by 8.6% indications of liver transplantation, and showed survival rates similar to CM.

scholarly journals Risk factors for poor survival after recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation

2021 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Minjeong Kim ◽  
Jinsoo Rhu ◽  
Gyu-Seong Choi ◽  
Jong Man Kim ◽  
Jae-Won Joh
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Poor Survival

Risk factors for primary poor function in liver transplantation: a retrospective single centre analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Fodor ◽  
A Woerdehoff ◽  
J Walte ◽  
S Neururer ◽  
H Esser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Single Centre

scholarly journals The survival rates and risk factors of implants in the early stage: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Yang ◽  
Huiting Hu ◽  
Mianyan Zeng ◽  
Hongxing Chu ◽  
Zekun Gan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Bone Quality ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Bone Augmentation ◽  
Early Survival ◽  
Immediate Implantation ◽  
Implant Length

Abstract Background Few large-sample studies in China have focused on the early survival of dental implants. The present study aimed to report the early survival rates of implants and determine the related influencing factors. Methods All patients receiving dental implants at our institution between 2006 and 2017 were included. The endpoint of the study was early survival rates of implants, according to gender, age, maxilla/mandible, dental position, bone augmentation, bone augmentation category, immediate implant, submerged implant category, implant diameter, implant length, implant torque, and other related factors. Initially, SPSS22.0 was used for statistical analysis. The Chi-square test was used to screen all factors, and those with p < 0.05 were further introduced into a multiple logistic regression model to illustrate the risk factors for early survival rates of implants. Results In this study, we included 1078 cases (601 males and 477 females) with 2053 implants. After implantation, 1974 implants were retained, and the early survival rate was 96.15%. Patients aged 30–60 years (OR  2.392), with Class I bone quality (OR  3.689), bone augmentation (OR  1.742), immediate implantation (OR  3.509), and implant length < 10 mm (OR  2.972), were said to possess risk factors conducive to early survival rates. Conclusions The early survival rate of implants in our cohort exceeded 96%, with risk factors including age, tooth position, bone quality, implant length, bone augmentation surgery, and immediate implantation. When the above factors coexist, implant placement should be treated carefully.

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcomes of Hepatic Resection versus Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matching Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshimi Kaido ◽  
Satoshi Morita ◽  
Sachiko Tanaka ◽  
Kohei Ogawa ◽  
Akira Mori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Hepatic Resection ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Living Donor ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Recurrence Rates

Hepatic resection (HR) and liver transplantation (LT) are surgical treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it is clinically impossible to perform a randomized, controlled study to determine the usefulness of these treatments. The present study compared survival rates and recurrence rates of HR versus living donor LT (LDLT) for HCC by using the propensity score method. Between January 1999 and August 2012, 936 patients (732 HR, 204 LDLT) underwent surgical therapy for HCC in our center. Using the propensity score matching, 80 well-balanced patients were defined. The 1- and 5-year overall survival rates were 90% and 53% in the HR group and 82% and 63% in the LT group, respectively. They were not significantly different between the two groups. The odds ratio estimated using the propensity score matching analysis was 0.842 (P=0.613). The 1- and 5-year recurrence rates were significantly lower in the LT group (9% and 21%) than in the HR group (43% and 74%) (P<0.001), and the odds ratio was 0.214 (P=0.001). In conclusion, HR should be considered a valid alternative to LDLT taking into consideration the risk for the living donor based on the results of this propensity score-matching study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document