scholarly journals Techniques for Abdominal Wall Closure after Damage Control Laparotomy: From Temporary Abdominal Closure to Early/Delayed Fascial Closure—A Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Huang ◽  
Jieshou Li ◽  
Wan-yee Lau
Keyword(s):  
Damage Control ◽  
Synthetic Mesh ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Temporary Abdominal Closure ◽  
Fascial Defect ◽  
Components Separation ◽  
Abdominal Closure ◽  
Combined Use ◽  
Early Primary ◽  
Primary Fascial Closure

Open abdomen (OA) has been an effective treatment for abdominal catastrophes in traumatic and general surgery. However, management of patients with OA remains a formidable task for surgeons. The central goal of OA is closure of fascial defect as early as is clinically feasible without precipitating abdominal compartment syndrome. Historically, techniques such as packing, mesh, and vacuum-assisted closure have been developed to assist temporary abdominal closure, and techniques such as components separation, mesh-mediated traction, bridging fascial defect with permanent synthetic mesh, or biologic mesh have also been attempted to achieve early primary fascial closure, either alone or in combined use. The objective of this review is to present the challenges of these techniques for OA with a goal of early primary fascial closure, when the patient’s physiological condition allows.

Should Negative Pressure Therapy Replace Any Other Temporary Abdominal Closure Device in Open-Abdomen Management of Secondary Peritonitis?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Pappalardo ◽  
Stefano Rausei ◽  
Vincenzo Ardita ◽  
Luigi Boni ◽  
Gianlorenzo Dionigi
Keyword(s):  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Secondary Peritonitis ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Temporary Abdominal Closure ◽  
Negative Pressure Therapy ◽  
Pressure Therapy ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Abdominal Closure ◽  
Primary Fascial Closure

AIM: To clarify the advantages of negative pressure therapy (NPT) compared to other methods of temporary abdominal closure (TAC) in the management of secondary peritonitis. METHODS: We retraced the history of known methods of TAC, and analyzed their advantages and disadvantages. We evaluated as the NPT mechanisms, both from the macroscopic that bio-molecular point of view, well suits to manage this difficult condition. RESULTS: The ideal TAC technique should be quick to apply, easy to change, protect and contain the abdominal viscera, decrease bowel edema, prevent loss of domain and abdominal compartment syndrome, limit contamination, allow egress of peritoneal fluid (and its estimation) and not result in adhesions. It should also be cost-effective, minimize the number of dressing changes and the number of surgical revisions, and ensure a high rate of early closure with a low rate of complications (especially entero-atmospheric fistula). For NPT, the reported fistula rate is 7%, primary fascial closure ranges from 33 to 100% (average 60%) and the mortality rate is about 20%. With the use of NPT as TAC, it may be possible to extend the window of time to achieve primary fascial closure (for up to 20-40 days). CONCLUSION: NPT has several potential advantages in open-abdomen (OA) management of secondary peritonitis and may make it possible to achieve all the goals suggested above for an ideal TAC system. Only trained staff should use NPT, following the manufacturer’s instructions when commercial products are used. Even if there was a significant evolution in OA management, we believe that further research into the role of NPT for secondary peritonitis is necessary.

scholarly journals Modified Opsite® Sandwich for Temporary Abdominal Closure: A Non-Traumatic Experience

2007 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
JM Wilde ◽  
MA Loudon
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Injured Patient ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Traumatic Experience ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Temporary Abdominal Closure ◽  
Abdominal Closure ◽  
Operative Severity Score

INTRODUCTION Laparostomy techniques have advanced since the advent of damage control surgery for the critically injured patient. Numerous methods of temporary abdominal closure (TAC) are described in the literature with most reports focusing on trauma. We describe a modified technique for TAC and report its use in a series of critically ill non-trauma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eleven patients under the care of one consultant underwent TAC over a 36-month period. A standardised technique was used in all cases and this is described. Severity of illness at the time of the first laparotomy was assessed using the Portsmouth variant of the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM). RESULTS Nineteen TACs were performed in 11 patients with a variety of serious surgical conditions. In-hospital mortality was zero despite seven of the patients having an individual P-POSSUM predicted mortality in excess of 50%. The laparostomy dressing proved simple in construction, facilitated nursing care and was well-tolerated in the critical care environment. All patients underwent definitive fascial closure during the index admission. CONCLUSIONS Laparostomy is a useful technique outwith the context of trauma. We have demonstrated the utility of the modified Opsite® sandwich vacuum pack for TAC in a series of critically ill patients with a universally favourable outcome. This small study suggests that selective use of TAC may reduce surgical mortality.

Challenges in the Management of the Open Abdomen

ICU Director ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Worhunsky ◽  
Gregory Magee ◽  
David A. Spain
Keyword(s):  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Original Description ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Critically Ill Patient ◽  
Temporary Abdominal Closure ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Abdominal Closure ◽  
Intra Abdominal Infection ◽  
Temporary Closure

First described more than 60 years ago, the open abdomen has now become a relatively common entity in surgical ICUs. Although the indications for an open abdomen have evolved since the original description of the damage control laparotomy, the goal remains to provide an unstable or critically ill patient time to correct their physiologic derangements. Temporary abdominal closure is thus used as a bridge to definitive repair and closure. Unfortunately, the open abdomen is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and recent studies have suggested an overuse of the technique. Once the decision is made to proceed with an open abdomen, multiple options exist for temporary abdominal closure. The hope is to obtain definitive closure shortly thereafter in an attempt to reduce potential complications including intra-abdominal infection or enteroatmospheric fistula. Options for temporary closure range from the Bogotá bag to vacuum-assisted techniques; a combined technique of sequential fascial closure with vacuum assistance has recently been shown to result in 100% fascial approximation. In situations where fascial closure is unattainable, temporary coverage with a skin graft may be employed, followed by late abdominal closure via complex abdominal herniorrhaphy. Even using advanced methods such as component separation or a “pork sandwich” technique, the complication and recurrence rates remain high. A careful understanding of the indications, optimal management, and potential complications of the open abdomen is necessary to limit its overuse and ultimately reduce some of the challenges associated with it.

Postoperative Neuromuscular Blocker Use Is Associated With Higher Primary Fascial Closure Rates After Damage Control Laparotomy

2010 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 557-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chadi T. Abouassaly ◽  
William D. Dutton ◽  
Victor Zaydfudim ◽  
Lesly A. Dossett ◽  
Timothy C. Nunez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Damage Control ◽  
Neuromuscular Blocker ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Damage Control Laparotomy ◽  
Primary Fascial Closure

Surgical Complications and Causes of Death in Trauma Patients that Require Temporary Abdominal Closure

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
JosÉ A. Montalvo ◽  
JosÉ A. Acosta ◽  
Pablo RodrÍguez ◽  
Kathia Alejandro ◽  
AndrÉs SÁrraga
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Complications ◽  
Causes Of Death ◽  
Surgical Complication ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Hypovolemic Shock ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Temporary Abdominal Closure ◽  
Abdominal Closure

Temporary abdominal closure (TAC) has increasingly been employed in the management of severely injured patients to avoid abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) and as part of damage control surgery (DCS). Although the use of TAC has received great interest, few data exist describing the morbidity and mortality associated with its use in trauma victims. The main goal of this study is to describe the incidence of surgical complications following the use of TAC as well as to define the mortality associated with this procedure. A retrospective review of patients admitted to a state-designated level 1 trauma center from April 2000 to February 2003 was performed. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years, traumatic injury, and need for exploratory laparotomy and use of TAC. A total of 120 patients were included in the study. The overall mortality of trauma patients requiring TAC was 59.2 per cent. The most common causes of death were acute inflammatory process (50.7%), followed by hypovolemic shock (43.7%). The incidence of surgical complications was 26.6 per cent. Intra-abdominal abscesses were the most frequent surgical complication (10%). After multiple logistic regression analysis, increasing age and a numerically greater initial base deficit were found to be independent predictors of mortality in trauma patients that require TAC.

scholarly journals Difference Between Delayed Anastomosis and Early Anastomosis in Damage Control Laparotomy Affecting the Infusion Volume and NPWT Output volume: Is Infusion Restriction Necessary in Delayed Anastomosis? A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohta Tanahashi ◽  
Hisaho Sato ◽  
Akiko Kawakami ◽  
Shusaku Sasaki ◽  
Yu nishinari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Temporary Abdominal Closure ◽  
Artificial Anus ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Damage Control Laparotomy ◽  
Second Look ◽  
Output Volume

Abstract Background: Delayed anastomosis is a treatment strategy used in damage control laparotomy (DCL). During temporary abdominal closure (TAC) with DCL, infusion volume, and negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) output volume are associated with the success and prognosis of primary fascial closure (PFC). The same may also hold true for anastomosis. The aim of this research is to evaluate whether the difference between early anastomosis and delayed anastomosis in DCL is related to infusion volume and NPWT output volume.Methods: This single-center retrospective analysis targeted patients managed with TAC during emergency surgery for trauma or intra-abdominal sepsis between January 2011 and December 2019. It included patients who underwent repair/anastomosis/artificial anus construction in the first surgery and patients who underwent intestinal resection in the first surgery followed by delayed anastomosis with no intestinal continuity. The main outcomes were infusion volume, NPWT output volume and complications.Results: One hundred nine patients who underwent emergency surgery were evaluated. Seventy-three patients were managed with TAC using NPWT. In 16 patients with early anastomosis and 21 patients with delayed anastomosis, there was no difference in the infusion volume (p=0.2318) or NPWT output volume (p=0.7128) 48 hours after surgery. Additionally, there was no difference in the occurrence of surgical site infection (p=0.315) and suture failure (p=0.8428). During the second-look surgery after 48 hours, the anastomosis was further postponed for 48% of the patients who underwent delayed anastomosis. There was no difference in the infusion volume (p=0.0783) up to the second-look surgery between the patients whose delayed anastomosis was postponed and those who underwent delayed anastomosis, but there was a tendency toward a large NPWT output volume (p=0.024) in the postponed delayed anastomosis group. Anastomosis and PFC were achieved for all patients whose delayed anastomosis was postponed.Conclusions: The presence or absence of anastomosis during TAC management does not affect NPWT output volume. Delayed anastomosis may be managed with the same infusion volume as that used for early anastomosis. There is also the option of postponing anastomosis if the planned delayed anastomosis is complicated.Trial RegistrationThe retrospective protocol of this study was approved by our institutional review board (MH2018-611).

Early Fascial Closure of the Damage Control Abdomen in Children

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 497-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myrick C. Shinall ◽  
Kaushik Mukherjee ◽  
Harold N. Lovvorn
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Necrotizing Pancreatitis ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Time Range ◽  
Dermal Matrix ◽  
Abdominal Closure

Traditional staged closure of the damage control abdomen frequently results in a ventral hernia, need for delayed abdominal wall reconstruction, and risk of multiple complications. We examined the potential benefits in children of early fascial closure of the damage control abdomen using human acellular dermal matrix (HADM). We reviewed our experience with five consecutive children sustaining intra-abdominal catastrophe and managed with damage control celiotomy. To accomplish early definitive abdominal closure, HADM was sewn in place as a fascial substitute; the skin and subcutaneous layers were approximated over silicone drains. The five patients ranged in age from 1 month to 19 years at the time of presentation. Intra-abdominal catastrophes included complex bowel injuries after blunt trauma in two children, necrotizing pancreatitis and gastric perforation in one teenager, necrotizing enterocolitis in one premature infant, and perforated typhlitis in one adolescent. All damage control wounds were dirty. Time range from initial celiotomy to definitive abdominal closure was 6 to 9 days. After definitive closure, one child developed a superficial wound infection. No patient developed a ventral hernia. After damage control celiotomy in children, early abdominal wall closure using HADM may minimize complications associated with delayed closure techniques and the need for additional procedures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document