scholarly journals Cadaveric Evaluation of Different Approaches for Quadratus Lumborum Blocks

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hun-Mu Yang ◽  
Sang Jun Park ◽  
Kyung Bong Yoon ◽  
Kyoungun Park ◽  
Shin Hyung Kim

Background. A quadratus lumborum (QL) block is an abdominal truncal block technique that primarily provides analgesia and anaesthesia to the abdominal wall. This cadaveric study was undertaken to compare the dye spread between different needle approaches for ultrasound-guided QL blocks in soft-embalmed cadavers. Methods. After randomization, an experienced anesthesiologist performed two lateral, three posterior, and five alternative QL blocks on the left or right sides of five cadavers. The target injection point for the alternative approach was the lumbar interfascial triangle, same as that of conventional posterior QL block, with a different needle trajectory. For each block, 20 ml of dye solution was injected. The lumbar region and abdominal flank were dissected. Results. Ten blocks were successfully performed. Regardless of the approach used, the middle thoracolumbar fascia was deeply stained in all blocks, but the anterior layer was less stained. The alternative approach was more associated with spread of injectate to the transversus abdominis and transversalis fascia plane. Despite accurate needle placement, all lateral QL blocks were associated with a certain amount of intramuscular or subcutaneous infiltration. Two posterior QL blocks showed a deeply stained posterior thoracolumbar fascia, and one of them was associated with obvious subcutaneous staining. The subcostal, iliohypogastric, and ilioinguinal nerves were mostly involved, but the thoracic paravertebral space and lumbar plexus were not affected in all blocks. Conclusions. The alternative approach for QL blocks was able to achieve a comparable extent when compared to the conventional approach.

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-40
Author(s):  
Angela Lucia Balocco ◽  
Ana M López ◽  
Cedric Kesteloot ◽  
Jean-Louis Horn ◽  
Jean-François Brichant ◽  
...  

Background and objectivesDifferent injection techniques for the quadratus lumborum (QL) block have been described. Data in human cadavers suggest that the transverse oblique paramedian (TOP) QL3 may reach the thoracic paravertebral space more consistently than the QL1 and QL2. However, the distribution of injectate in cadavers may differ from that in patients. Hence, we assessed the distribution of the injectate after the QL1, QL2, and TOP QL3 techniques in patients.Materials and methodsThirty-four patients scheduled for abdominal surgery received QL blocks postoperatively; 26 patients received bilateral and 8 patients received unilateral blocks. Block injections were randomly allocated to QL1, QL2, or TOP QL3 techniques (20 blocks per each technique). The injections consisted of 18 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% with 2 mL of radiopaque contrast, injected lateral or posterior to the QL muscle for the QL1 and QL2 techniques, respectively. For the TOP QL3, the injection was into the plane between the QL and psoas muscles, proximal to the L2 transverse process. Two reviewers, blinded to the allocation, reviewed three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images to assess the distribution of injectate.Results and discussionThe QL1 block spread in the transversus abdominis plane (TAP), QL2 in the TAP, and posterior aspect of the QL muscle, whereas TOP QL3 spread consistently in the anterior aspect of the QL muscle with occasional spread to the lumbar and thoracic paravertebral areas.ConclusionsThe spread of injectate after QL1, QL2, and QL3 blocks, resulted in different distribution patterns, primarily in the area of injection. The TOP QL3 did not result in consistent interfascial spread toward the thoracic paravertebral space.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Çağdaş Baytar ◽  
Canan Yılmaz ◽  
Derya Karasu ◽  
Serra Topal

Background. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided (USG) subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and quadratus lumborum (QL) block as preventive analgesia methods after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods. A total of 120 patients, 18–75 years of age, were separated into 2 groups preoperatively. Patients in group TAP (n = 60) received 0.3 ml/kg bupivacaine with USG bilateral subcostal TAP block; patients in group QL (n = 60) received 0.3 ml/kg bupivacaine with USG bilateral QL block. Patients were assessed 24 h postoperatively, and pain scores, time to first analgesia requirement, total analgesia dose, and postoperative complications during the first 24 h were recorded. Results. Fifty-three patients in group TAP and 54 in group QL were ultimately evaluated. No statistically significant difference was found in at rest and dynamic visual analog scale scores between the groups. There was also no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to total analgesia consumption. Although the duration of anesthesia was significantly longer in group QL, no statistically significant difference was found in the duration of surgery between the groups (p<0.05). Conclusions. Results of this study demonstrated that USG subcostal TAP and QL blocks similarly reduced postoperative pain scores and analgesia consumption, with high patient satisfaction. However, subcostal TAP block could be considered preferable to QL block because it can be applied easily and in a shorter time.


QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Mohamed Taha Elsafty ◽  
Hanan Mahmoud Farag Awad ◽  
Mohamed Saleh Ahmed ◽  
Ahmed Elkholy Mahdy

Abstract Background Cesarean section rate increased those days and postoperative pain control. The goal of postoperative pain management is provision of comfort, early mobilization and improved respiratory function without causing inadequate sedation and respiratory compromise, which can be achieved through using multimodal analgesic therapy, preference for regional techniques, avoidance of sedatives, non-invasive ventilation with supplemental oxygen and early mobilization. Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided trans-muscular QLB compared with TAP block after cesarean section surgeryperiod regarding pain relief, provision of comfort, and improved respiratory functions. Patients and Methods After approval of anesthesiology department scientific and ethical committees in Ain Shams University Hospitals, female patients were included in the study, and were divided into three groups (n = 20; each); group QLB and group TAP. Group QLB: Patients (n = 20) of this group received bilateral ultrasound-guided QLB after induction of general anesthesia using 0.2 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.125%, Group TAP: Patients (n = 20) of this group received bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block after induction of general anesthesia using 0.2 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.125%. Results The current study also measured and compared postoperative VAS score and firs time to rescue analgesia and the total amount of opioid (pethidine) given in the first 24 hours with the standard deviation for each of the two groups studied we found that TAP patients had the highest values compared to the QLB group. This is mainly due to the extension of the local anesthetic agent beyond the transverse abdominal plane to the thoracic paravertebral space, which then results in more analgesia, even somatic and visceral pain control. Conclusion Quadratus lumborum block was the most effective technique in providing analgesia after cesarean section without associated hemodynamic instability in comparison to transversus abdominis plane block and even more time covering to rescue opioid.


Author(s):  
Stuart A. Grant ◽  
David B Auyong

This chapter describes the clinical anatomy and outlines the tools and techniques needed to perform thoracic, abdominal and neuraxial ultrasound-guided procedures. The nerve blocks described here include the transversus abdominis plane (TAP), quadratus lumborum, ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric, rectus sheath, intercostal, PECS, serratus plane, paravertebral, and neuraxial spinal and epidural blocks. For each nerve block, the indications, risks, and benefits of the varying approaches are described in detail. The chapter includes step-by-step instructions with illustrations to allow the operator to perform clinically effective and safe ultrasound-guided thoracic, truncal, and neuraxial procedures. At the conclusion of each block description, a “Pearls” segment highlights important tips gleaned from our clinical experience. This chapter provides the practitioner with thorough instruction and knowledge allowing the optimal delivery of regional anesthesia for any thoracic or abdominal surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document