scholarly journals Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infection following Introduction of a Central Line Bundle in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Molly Bannatyne ◽  
Judith Smith ◽  
Malavika Panda ◽  
Mohamed E. Abdel-Latif ◽  
Tejasvi Chaudhari

Background. Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) constitute a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in neonatal populations. There has been an overwhelming increase in the use of evidence-based care practices, also known as bundles, in the reduction of these infections. In this report, rates of CLABSI and central line utilisation were examined following the introduction of a central line bundle in our Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at the Canberra Hospital. Methods. The research undertaken was a retrospective cohort study in which newborn infants admitted to the Canberra Hospital NICU between January 2011 and December 2016 and had a central line inserted were included in the study. Data regarding central line days, bed days, infection rates, and patient demographics were collected before and after the introduction of an intervention bundle. CLABSI rates were calculated per 1,000 central line days for before (2011-2013) and after (2014-2016) the introduction of the bundle. The postintervention period was retrospectively analysed for compliance, with data regarding the completion of maintenance forms and insertion forms collected. Results. Overall, the results showed a significant decrease in CLABSI rates from 8.8 per 1,000 central line days to 4.9 per 1,000 central line days in the intervention period (p<0.001). Central line utilisation ratio (CLUR: ratio of central line days to bed days) was also reduced between pre- and postintervention periods, from 0.177 (4414/25013) to 0.13 (3633/27384; p<0.001). Compliance to insertion forms and maintenance forms was observed to increase within the intervention period. Conclusion. The implementation of a central line bundle was effective in reducing both CLABSI rates and dwell time (CLUR) for central venous catheters.

2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982092818
Author(s):  
Mohammad A A Bayoumi ◽  
Matheus F P Van Rens ◽  
Prem Chandra ◽  
Airene L V Francia ◽  
Sunitha D’Souza ◽  
...  

Background: Until the 1980s, central vascular access in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit was predominantly delivered by umbilical catheters and only and if needed by surgical cutdowns or subclavian vein catheterization through blind percutaneous venipuncture. In the early 1980s, epicutaneo-caval catheters were successfully introduced. Methods: In our Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, a dedicated team to insert epicutaneo-caval catheters was formally established in January 2017, including 12 neonatologists and 1 neonatal nurse practitioner. A before- versus after-intervention study was designed to determine whether the establishment of the epicutaneo-caval catheter insertion team is associated with increased success rates and a decreased risk of catheter-related complications. Success rates and other catheter-related parameters were traced from 2016 onward. Collected data were analyzed for three consecutive years: 2016, 2017, and 2018. Results: The epicutaneo-caval catheter team inserted 1336 catheters over 3 years. Both first prick (from 57.7% to 66.9%; p = 0.023) and overall success (from 81.7% to 97.6%; p < 0.0001) rates significantly improved. In 2018, the number of tunneled or surgically inserted central venous catheters came down to zero (p < 0.0001). Overall catheter-related complications were significantly lower following the epicutaneo-caval catheter team’s establishment (p < 0.0001) while there was no significant decrease noted (p = 0.978) in central line–associated bacterial stream infection rates. Conclusion: A dedicated epicutaneo-caval catheter team is a promising intervention to increase success rates and significantly decrease catheter-related complications in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Standardizing epicutaneo-caval catheter placement is important; however, standardizing catheter maintenance seems essential to the improvement of central line–associated bacterial stream infection rates.


2017 ◽  
Vol 173 (7) ◽  
pp. 1839-1847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faheem Malam ◽  
Taila Hartley ◽  
Meredith K. Gillespie ◽  
Christine M. Armour ◽  
Erika Bariciak ◽  
...  

Surgery ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 144 (4) ◽  
pp. 492-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Galpern ◽  
Alejandro Guerrero ◽  
Ann Tu ◽  
Bashar Fahoum ◽  
Leslie Wise

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document