scholarly journals Sheehan Syndrome Presenting with Psychotic Manifestations Mimicking Schizophrenia in a Young Female: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Nipun Lakshitha de Silva ◽  
Janith Galhenage ◽  
Madhubhashinee Dayabandara ◽  
Noel Somasundaram

Introduction. Sheehan syndrome presents with features of multiple hormone deficiencies including lactation failure and amenorrhoea as well as with features of central hypothyroidism and adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency. Psychiatric manifestations are mostly limited to cognitive impairment. Psychotic presentations are rare and limited to case reports. Case Presentation. A 32-year-old female was evaluated for fearfulness and delusions for one year. She had persecutory and bizarre delusions, delusion of thought possession, and elementary auditory hallucinations. These began four months after the birth of her third child. The delivery had been complicated with postpartum haemorrhage. Her symptoms caused the functional decline and progressively worsened, resulting in suicidal ideation. Cognitive assessment revealed mild impairment in attention. Further inquiry revealed lethargy, constipation, cold intolerance, and lactation failure. She was slow, having dry skin, puffy face, and bradycardia with a blood pressure of 80/60 mmHg (supine) and 70/50 mmHg (standing). She had hyponatraemia, elevated creatine phosphokinase, low thyroxine, prolactin, FSH, LH, and IGF-1. She had poor cortisol and growth hormone response to the insulin tolerance test. MRI-pituitary showed empty sella. A diagnosis of Sheehan syndrome was made. Her symptoms improved completely after the initiation of levothyroxine and hydrocortisone. Conclusions. Sheehan syndrome can present with psychotic symptoms mimicking schizophrenia with variable involvement of cognition. Detailed reporting of these patients would enhance better characterization of the clinical presentation and risk profile of these patients.

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Kevin C J Yuen ◽  

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is a well-recognized clinical syndrome in adults, and its diagnosis is established through one or more GH stimulation tests. The decision to perform GH stimulation testing should be based on medical history and clinical findings, and using appropriate GH stimulation test/s for biochemical confirmation. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) remains the diagnostic test of choice; however, this test is labor intensive, contraindicated in the elderly and in adults with seizure disorders and ischemic heart disease, can be unpleasant for the patient, and is potentially hazardous. With the discontinuation of the growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) analog (Geref®) in the US in 2008, the glucagon stimulation test (GST) has gained increasing popularity as the alternative test to the ITT because of its availability, reproducibility, safety, lack of influence by gender and hypothalamic cause of GH deficiency (GHD), and relatively few contraindications. In this article, recommendations for performing this test, the potential drawbacks in conducting and caveats in interpreting this test, and its future perspectives are discussed.


2002 ◽  
pp. 667-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Petersenn ◽  
R Jung ◽  
FU Beil

OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults should be made using provocative testing of GH secretion. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is recommended as the gold standard investigation. Because of the risk of serious complications, patients with epilepsy or known ischemic heart disease should not undergo this test. GHRP-6 is a synthetic hexapeptide that releases GH by binding to specific hypothalamic and pituitary receptors. We assessed the diagnostic capability of GH stimulation by GHRP-6 alone or in combination with GHRH in comparison to the results of an ITT. DESIGN: Twenty patients underwent an ITT for suspected pituitary or adrenal disease. Either GHRP-6 (1 microg/kg) alone, or GHRP-6 in combination with GHRH (1 microg/kg) were administered on different days. Blood samples were obtained during a subsequent 90-min period for measurement of GH. RESULTS: Ten patients had a GH peak response of less than 3 microg/l during ITT and were considered growth hormone deficient (GHD). The GH mean peak (+/-S.E.M., range) in this group was 0.7 microg/l (+/-0.3, 0.1-2.9) compared with 14.5 microg/l (+/-3.5, 3.8-40.8) in the group of patients with a GH peak response of more than 3 microg/l (growth hormone sufficient (GS)). For the GHRP-6 test, the GH mean peak was 1.3 microg/l (+/-0.6, 0.1-6.7) in the GHD group versus 25.7 microg/l (+/-5.5, 7.7-54.2) in the GS group. After GHRP-6+GHRH, the GH mean peaks were 4.0 microg/l (+/-1.3, 0.2-11.9) versus 54.7 microg/l (+/-11.1, 13.9-136.0) respectively. During administration of GHRP-6, the only side effects observed were flush symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Peak GH levels below 7 microg/l for the GHRP-6 test and below 13 microg/l for the combined GHRP-6+GHRH test identified all patients with GH deficiency correctly as defined by ITT. The results suggest that testing with GHRP-6 or GHRP-6+GHRH is as sensitive and specific as an ITT for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency.


2007 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 1705-1709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Murray ◽  
Martin Bidlingmaier ◽  
Christian J. Strasburger ◽  
Stephen M. Shalet

Abstract Context: Similar to patients with severe GH deficiency (GHD), those with a more moderate impairment of GH secretion [GH insufficiency (GHI)] have abnormal body composition, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance. Given the inherent problems in the diagnosis of severe GHD, the situation is likely to be even more difficult in individuals with GHI. Objective: The objective of the study was to examine the utility of GH stimulation tests and GH-dependent proteins in the diagnosis of GHI. Design: The study was a cross-sectional, case-controlled study. Patients: The study included 31 patients with GHD, 23 with GHI [peak GH 3–7 μg/liter (9–21 mU/liter)], and 30 age- and sex-matched controls. Main Outcome Measures: Demographic and biochemical markers of GH status were measured. Results: Nineteen of the patients with GHI (83%) had no additional anterior pituitary hormone deficits. Ten GHI patients showed discordant GH status based on the two GH stimulation tests performed. GH status was defined by the highest peak GH value achieved; in four this was to the insulin tolerance test (ITT), four the arginine test, and two the GHRH-arginine test. In five of the six patients in whom GH status was not defined by the ITT, peak GH levels to the ITT were in the range 2.4–2.9 μg/liter. IGF-I values for the GHI adults were significantly lower than the control subjects (121 ± 48 vs. 162 ± 75 μg/liter; P < 0.05); however, only six (26%) had values below the 10th percentile of levels seen in the control group. IGF binding protein-3 and acid labile subunit levels of the GHI adults were not significantly different from the controls. Conclusion: The diagnosis of GHI in an individual is extremely difficult because the patients rarely exhibit additional pituitary hormone deficits, and levels of GH-dependent proteins are normal in the majority. Diagnosis relies heavily on GH stimulation tests and requires two tests in all patients to define GHI; obesity when present is potentially a major confounder.


2003 ◽  
Vol 88 (12) ◽  
pp. 5784-5789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Lange ◽  
Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen ◽  
Ole Lander Svendsen ◽  
Knud William Kastrup ◽  
Anders Juul ◽  
...  

Abstract The aim was to reevaluate a group of adults treated for idiopathic childhood onset GH deficiency (GHD) after 18 yr without GH treatment. Twenty-six (11 females) patients participated. All but two had isolated GHD. Childhood diagnosis was established by insulin tolerance test (ITT). The patients were retested with an ITT to evaluate adult GH status. In five patients, an arginine and a synacthen test were performed instead of an ITT. Eleven of 25 patients had a subnormal cortisol response to ITT or synacthen. Ten patients had a GH peak less than 3.0 μg/liter (0.5. ± 0.5 μg/liter), whereas 16 patients displayed a normal GH response (12.3 ± 10.6 μg/liter) after ITT. IGF-I values were decreased in the patients with a pathological retest as well as in patients with a normal GH response compared with controls (P < 0.005). In 26 idiopathic childhood onset GHD patients, 44% of the patients had developed adrenal insufficiency; 38.5% had persistent GHD in adulthood, using the same test in both childhood and adulthood. Patients having a normal GH test had decreased IGF-I levels, compared with controls, indicating impaired function of a seemingly normal GH axis. It is imperative that pituitary axes other than the GH axis are tested at regular intervals, even in the absence of GHD in adulthood.


2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (9) ◽  
pp. 709-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesar L. Boguszewski ◽  
Claudio Silva de Lacerda ◽  
Luiz de Lacerda Filho ◽  
Julienne A. R. de Carvalho ◽  
Margaret C. S. Boguszewski

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of serum IGF-1 in the detection of isolated (IGHD) or combined growth hormone deficiency (CGHD) at the transition phase. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty nine patients with GHD during childhood [16 with IGHD (10 men) and 33 with CGHD (24 men); age 23.2 ± 3.5 yrs.] were submitted to an insulin tolerance test (ITT) with a GH peak < 5 µg/L used for the diagnosis of GHD at the transition phase. Pituitary function and IGF-1 measurements were evaluated in the basal sample of the ITT. Transition patients were reclassified as GH-sufficient (SGH; n = 12), IGHD (n = 7), or CGHD (n = 30). RESULTS: Five (31%) patients with IGHD and 32 (97%) with CGHD at childhood persisted with GHD at retesting. One patient with IGHD was reclassified as CGHD, whereas 3 patients with CGHD were reclassified as IGHD. Mean GH peak was 0.2 ± 0.3 µg/L in the CGHD, 1.3 ± 1.5 µg/L in the IGHD, and 18.1 ± 13.1 µg/L in the SGH group. Serum IGF-1 level was significantly higher in the SGH (272 ± 107 ng/mL) compared to IGHD (100.2 ± 110) and CGHD (48.7 ± 32.8) (p < 0.01). All patients reclassified as CGHD, 86% reclassified as IGHD, and 8.3% reclassified as SGH had low IGF-1 level, resulting in 97.3% sensitivity and 91.6% specificity in the detection of GHD at the transition period; the cutoff value of 110 ng/mL showed 94.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Mean IGF-1 values did not differ in IGHD or CGHD associated with one, two, three, or four additional pituitary deficiencies. CONCLUSION: IGF-1 measurement is accurate to replace ITT as initial diagnostic test for IGHD and CGHD detection at the transition phase.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document