scholarly journals Dexamethasone as an Analgesic Adjunct for Postcesarean Delivery Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Jennifer E. Mehdiratta ◽  
Jennifer E. Dominguez ◽  
Yi-Ju Li ◽  
Remie Saab ◽  
Ashraf S. Habib ◽  
...  

Objectives. Dexamethasone has been shown to have analgesic properties in the general surgical population. However, the analgesic effects for women that undergo cesarean deliveries under spinal anesthesia remain unclear and may be related to the timing of dexamethasone administration. We hypothesized that intravenous dexamethasone administered before skin incision would significantly reduce postoperative opioid consumption at 24 h after cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine. Methods. Women undergoing elective cesarean deliveries under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive 8 mg of intravenous dexamethasone or placebo prior to skin incision. Both groups received a standardized spinal anesthetic and multimodal postoperative analgesic regime. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption at 24 h. Secondary outcomes included cumulative opioid consumption at 48 h, time to first analgesic request, and pain scores at rest and on movement at 2, 24, and 48 h. Results. 47 patients were analyzed—23 subjects that received dexamethasone and 24 subjects that received placebo. There was no difference in the median (Q1, Q3) cumulative opioid consumption in the first 24 hours following cesarean delivery between the dexamethasone group {15 (7.5, 20.0) mg} and the placebo group {13.75 (2.5, 31.25) mg} ( P = 0.740 ). There were no differences between the groups in cumulative opioid consumption at 48 h, time to first analgesic request, and pain scores. Conclusions. Intravenous dexamethasone 8 mg administered prior to skin incision did not reduce the opioid consumption of women that underwent cesarean deliveries under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine and multimodal postoperative analgesic regimen.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Eduardo Toshiyuki Moro ◽  
Miguel Antônio Teixeira Ferreira ◽  
Renyer dos Santos Gonçalves ◽  
Roberta Costa Vargas ◽  
Samira Joverno Calil ◽  
...  

Intrathecal morphine is widely and successfully used to prevent postoperative pain after orthopedic surgery, but it is frequently associated with side effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of dexamethasone or ondansetron when compared to placebo to reduce the occurrence of these undesirable effects and, consequently, to improve the quality of recovery based on patient’s perspective. Methods. One hundred and thirty-five patients undergoing lower extremity orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia using bupivacaine and morphine were randomly assigned to receive IV dexamethasone, ondansetron, or saline. On the morning following surgery, a quality of recovery questionnaire (QoR-40) was completed. Results. No differences were detected in the global and dimensional QoR-40 scores following surgery; however, following postanesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge, pain scores were higher in patients receiving ondansetron compared with patients who received dexamethasone. Conclusion. Neither ondansetron nor dexamethasone improves the quality of recovery after lower limbs orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia using intrathecal morphine.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 2221
Author(s):  
Amanda Chao ◽  
Ioana Pasca ◽  
Matthew Alschuler ◽  
Jay Lee ◽  
Michelle Woodfin ◽  
...  

Background: Cesarean deliveries represent a large percentage of deliveries worldwide. Patients undergoing repeat cesarean deliveries are known to have increased risks for surgical complications. However, little is known regarding potential differences in pain. We sought to compare postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores in opioid naïve patients undergoing primary versus repeat non-emergent cesarean delivery. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Patient inclusion criteria included: having a non-emergent cesarean delivery, receiving a spinal procedure for surgical anesthesia without general anesthesia, and following the same postoperative pain management protocols. Exclusion criteria included: history of opioid tolerance, illicit drug use, or prior, non-obstetric, major abdominal surgery. The primary outcome marker was total morphine equivalents consumed 0–72 h post-procedure compared between the primary versus repeat cesarean delivery groups. Secondary outcome markers were opioid consumption and pain scores in 24-h period increments for the first 72 h postoperatively. Results: 1617 patients were screened. 217 primary and 377 repeat cesarean deliveries met criteria for comparison. Reduced opioid consumption was demonstrated for the total opioid consumption 0–72 h for the repeat cesarean delivery group (median = 35) compared to the primary cesarean delivery group (median = 58), p = 0.0005. When divided into 24-h periods, differences were demonstrated for the 24–48 and 48–72 h periods but not the 0–24 h period. Pain scores did not differ statistically. Conclusion: Opioid naïve obstetric patients who undergo non-emergent repeat cesarean delivery demonstrate lower opioid consumption in the postoperative period. Providers should be aware of this potential difference in order to better educate patients and provide adequate pain management. Highlights: The study reviewed differences in opioid consumption between primary and repeat cesarean deliveries. All patients received the same protocol for spinal dosage and pain management. Repeat cesarean deliveries were associated with lower opioid consumption.


Author(s):  
Julia K. Shinnick ◽  
Merima Ruhotina ◽  
Phinnara Has ◽  
Bridget J. Kelly ◽  
E. Christine Brousseau ◽  
...  

Objective The aim of this study is to assess the effect of a resident-led enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for scheduled prelabor cesarean deliveries on hospital length of stay and postpartum opioid consumption. Study Design This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent scheduled prelabor cesarean deliveries before and after implementation of an ERAS protocol at a single academic tertiary care institution. The primary outcome was length of stay following cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included protocol adherence, inpatient opioid consumption, and patient-centered outcomes. The protocol included multimodal analgesia and antiemetic medications, expedited urinary catheter removal, early discontinuation of maintenance intravenous fluids, and early ambulation. Results A total of 250 patients were included in the study: 122 in the pre-ERAS cohort and 128 in the post-ERAS cohort. There were no differences in baseline demographics, medical comorbidities, or cesarean delivery characteristics between the two groups. Following protocol implementation, hospital length of stay decreased by an average of 7.9 hours (pre-ERAS 82.1 vs. post-ERAS 74.2, p < 0.001). There was 89.8% adherence to the entire protocol as written. Opioid consumption decreased by an average of 36.5 mg of oxycodone per patient, with no significant differences in pain scores from postoperative day 1 to postoperative day 4 (all p > 0.05). Conclusion A resident-driven quality improvement project was associated with decreased length of hospital stay, decreased opioid consumption, and unchanged visual analog pain scores at the time of hospital discharge. Implementation of this ERAS protocol is feasible and effective. Key Points


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao-ran Yang ◽  
Xue-han Li ◽  
Xue-mei He ◽  
Ru-rong Wang

Abstract Background: In recent years, the number of cesarean deliveries is on the rise. Although intrathecal morphine (ITM) can relieve pain and is widely applied in cesarean deliveries, it is also associated with many side effects. As a new analgesic technology, transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has also begun to play a certain role after cesarean delivery, with fewer adverse effects. This article mainly compares the analgesic and adverse effect of ITM and TAP block in cesarean delivery.Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase and Web of Science, for randomized controlled trials before October 5, 2020 to compare ITM and TAP block. Our main result is the pain score at rest 24 hours after cesarean delivery, and the secondary result is the pain score at movement 24 hours after operation, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), itching, and morphine consumption. We conducted a subgroup analysis based on economic development.Result: Six articles with 563 sample sizes were included. The results showed there was no significant difference between ITM and TAP block in the pain score at rest 24 hours after surgery (95% CI: -1.33 to 0.40; P=0.29). After subgroup analysis based on economic development, Parturients in the ITM group have lower rest pain score than those in the TAP group (95% CI: -1.27 to -0.28; P=0.002) in the developed area. There was no significant difference in the 24h moving pain score (95% CI:-1.47 to 0.29;P=0.19)and incidence of pruritus (95% CI:0.87 to 8.85;P=0.08). The ITM group showed less morphine consumption when compared with the TAP group (95% CI:-13.12 to -2.95;P=0.002). The incidence of PONV was lower in the TAP group as compared to the ITM group (95% CI:1.92 to 4.87; P<0.00001).Conclusion: We found that Parturients in the ITM and TAP block groups had similar analgesic effects. However, after subgroup analysis, in developed countries, Parturients in the ITM group has better analgesic effects than those in the TAP block group with less morphine consumption. Differently, TAP block had low side effects such as nausea, vomiting. Therefore, if patients cannot use ITM for analgesia after cesarean delivery, or patients have high risk of PONV, then TAP is still a valuable analgesia option.Registration number: Registered on Prospero with the registration number of CRD42020210135


2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
pp. 1382-1391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily E. Sharpe ◽  
Rochelle J. Molitor ◽  
Katherine W. Arendt ◽  
Vanessa E. Torbenson ◽  
David A. Olsen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Intrathecal opioids are routinely administered during spinal anesthesia for postcesarean analgesia. The effectiveness of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia is well established, and the use of intrathecal hydromorphone is growing. No prospective studies have compared the effectiveness of equipotent doses of intrathecal morphine versus intrathecal hydromorphone as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen for postcesarean analgesia. The authors hypothesized that intrathecal morphine would result in superior analgesia compared with intrathecal hydromorphone 24 h after delivery. Methods In this single-center, double-blinded, randomized trial, 138 parturients undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery were randomized to receive 150 µg of intrathecal morphine or 75 µg of intrathecal hydromorphone as part of a primary spinal anesthetic and multimodal analgesic regimen; 134 parturients were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was the numerical rating scale score for pain with movement 24 h after delivery. Static and dynamic pain scores, nausea, pruritus, degree of sedation, and patient satisfaction were assessed every 6 h for 36 h postpartum. Total opioid consumption was recorded. Results There was no significant difference in pain scores with movement at 24 h (intrathecal hydromorphone median [25th, 75th] 4 [3, 5] and intrathecal morphine 3 [2, 4.5]) or at any time point (estimated difference, 0.5; 95% CI, 0 to 1; P = 0.139). Opioid received in the first 24 h did not differ between groups (median [25th, 75th] oral morphine milligram equivalents for intrathecal hydromorphone 30 [7.5, 45.06] vs. intrathecal morphine 22.5 [14.0, 37.5], P = 0.769). From Kaplan–Meier analysis, the median time to first opioid request was 5.4 h for hydromorphone and 12.1 h for morphine (log-rank test P = 0.200). Conclusions Although the hypothesis was that intrathecal morphine would provide superior analgesia to intrathecal hydromorphone, the results did not confirm this. At the doses studied, both intrathecal morphine and intrathecal hydromorphone provide effective postcesarean analgesia when combined with a multimodal analgesia regimen. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document