scholarly journals Continuous Spinal Anesthesia following Inadvertent Dural Puncture during Epidural Placement for an Emergency Laparotomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Andrew Emyedu ◽  
Bernadette Kyoheirwe ◽  
Patience Atumanya

Summary. Emergency exploratory laparotomy conducted under continuous spinal anesthesia using a standard epidural set following an accidental dural puncture. Background and Objectives. Continuous spinal anesthesia is one of the least utilized regional anesthesia techniques globally. It could be an alternative anesthesia technique for abdominal and lower limb surgeries following an accidental dural puncture. The aim of this report was to describe a case in which continuous spinal anesthesia was successfully conducted for emergency exploratory laparotomy following an accidental dural puncture during epidural placement. Case Report. A 38-year-old male presented to our accident and emergency unit with a one-day history of colicky abdominal pain associated with constipation, abdominal distension, and vomiting. He was diagnosed with intestinal obstruction and underwent an emergency exploratory laparotomy under continuous spinal anesthesia using a standard epidural set following an accidental dural puncture. Conclusion. This case demonstrates that in case of an accidental dural puncture during epidural placement, the catheter can be advanced into the intrathecal space and continuous spinal anesthesia conducted for abdominal surgeries using a standard epidural catheter.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Burchard ◽  
Alan A Thomay

Abstract A 53-year-old Caucasian male presented with a 2-week history of abdominal distension, pain, nausea and lethargy. His symptoms began 1 day after an all-terrain vehicle accident during which he suffered blunt-force trauma to his mid-right abdomen. CT scan demonstrated abnormal thickening of the ascending colon and terminal ilium with surrounding inflammation within the retroperitoneum and colonic mesentery. Given his likely mechanism and symptomatic improvement, he was initially managed conservatively. However, he was readmitted with recurrence of symptoms, and a repeat CT scan demonstrated no interval improvement. An exploratory laparotomy was performed and a firm, fixed mass of the right-colon and colonic mesentery was found. Final histopathology of the mass revealed a diffuse lymphoid infiltrate with numerous mitotic figures and apoptotic cells. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for CD45, CD20, CD10, and BCL-6 and negative for CD3, TdT, and BCL-2, indicating a diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Nuntasiri Eamudomkarn ◽  
Naratassapol Likitdee ◽  
Pilaiwan Kleebkaow ◽  
Chumnan Kietpeerakool

Massive ascites as a presentation of endometriosis is a rare clinical entity that is most commonly seen in black nulliparous females. Herein, we describe a case of a 32-year-old multiparous Thai woman who presented with a two-year history of abdominal distension. Computerized tomography of the abdominopelvic region showed an infiltrative enhancing lesion involving the cul-de-sac and perirectal region with massive loculated ascites, suggesting carcinomatosis peritonei. Abdominal paracentesis was performed to yield fluid samples for evaluation, which revealed no malignant cells, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was negative for tuberculosis. The patient underwent exploratory laparotomy which revealed a large amount of serosanguinous ascites, thickened matted bowel loops, and necrotic debris covering the entire surface of the peritoneum and visceral organs. The surgical procedures included drainage of 6.5 liters of ascites, lysis adhesion, biopsy of the peritoneum, and right salpingo-oophorectomy. Histologic examination revealed benign endometrial glands with stroma at the peritoneum tissue and broad ligament. Other causes of ascites were excluded. The ascites responded to drainage and hormonal suppression. A final diagnosis of endometriosis was made based on these findings. Endometriosis should therefore be considered in differential diagnosis in women of childbearing age who present with ascites.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 669
Author(s):  
Kamal Nain Rattan ◽  
Gurupriya J. ◽  
Shruti Bansal ◽  
Rohit Kapoor ◽  
Roomi Yadav

Acquired colonic atresias are very rare but, are known in association with necrotizing enterocolitis. We report a case of a 4-month term male infant with recurrent episodes of abdominal distension, bilious vomiting and constipation off and on, without the history of necrotizing enterocolitis. Exploratory laparotomy was performed, an inflammatory mass with multiple dense interloop adhesions were found in the mid-transverse colon. These adhesions were lysed to identify the proximal dilated and distal blind end of the colon.  Rest of the gut was normal.  This case is unique for the fact that, it is a case of acquired colonic atresia without history of necrotizing enterocolitis, unlike other reported cases of acquired colonic atresia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. e229329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pratyusha Tirumanisetty ◽  
Jose William Sotelo ◽  
Michael Disalle ◽  
Meenal Sharma

A 75-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis on rituximab presented with a 1-week history of constipation and abdominal distension. Subsequent workup showed presence of air in the bowel wall without perforation initially. Due to positive blood cultures, worsening leucocytosis and high suspicion for perforation, an exploratory laparotomy was performed revealing necrotic bowel, walled off perforation and abscess. Patient underwent right hemicolectomy with diversion loop ileostomy. Clinicians must recognise that monoclonal antibodies like rituximab can mask signs of inflammation and therefore should maintain a high index of suspicion for intestinal perforation when evaluating patients with minimal symptoms and pneumatosis intestinalis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 73-76
Author(s):  
Matas Kalinauskas ◽  
Mantilė Juotkutė

Introduction: Over the past decades, the number of wo­men choosing to have epidural analgesia or undergoing spinal anesthesia during labor is steadily increasing. Con­sequently, a risk for complications is increasing. Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is considered one of the most common complication following accidental dural puncture (ADP). Sources and a method: A literature overview were con­ducted via search engine “PubMed (Medline)” and “Goo­gle Scholar”. Randomized controlled trials, meta – analy­sis, retrospective, prospective trials and systemic reviews on PDPH were selected. Aim of the review: To evaluate the most commonly des­cribed risk factors, clinical presentation and prevention of PDPH in the obstetric field. Results: The occurrence of ADP during neuraxial anest­hesia reported in the literature is relatively small – 0,1 – 1,5%. PDPH is a potentially expected complication after any lumbar punction. It presents as a headache within five days of the puncture due to low cerebrospinal fluid pressure. The pain is often bilateral, located in the frontal or occipital areas. Symptoms, such as vision and hearing impairment, neck pain and nausea might follow. Usually, the symptoms fade out spontaneously within two weeks. Risk factors for PDPH are modifiable (technique of the injection and anesthesiologist’s skills) and non-modifia­ble (pregnancy, low body mass index (BMI), dehydra­tion, history of PDPH). The goal of preventing PDPH is to identify and correct the risk factors associated with this condition. Main described means being equipment and experience, conservative measures, administration of epidural morphine, intravenous dexamethasone or co­syntropin, epidural blood patch and intrathecal catheter. Conclusions: 1. PDPH manifests as an orthostatic hea­dache with or without ocular, neural, hearing and other symptoms. 2. Young pregnant women with low BMI are more likely to suffer from PDPH. 3. PDPH preven­tion consists of risk factor correction and proper medi­cal techniques.


2019 ◽  
pp. 37-43
Author(s):  
Thi Minh Thu Pham ◽  
Thi Hoang Yen Do ◽  
Van Long Le ◽  
Van Minh Nguyen ◽  
Viet Ha Vo ◽  
...  

Objective: To estimate the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) and risk factors in women underwent Cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. Materials and method: In a prospective descriptive study, parturients underwent Cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. Incidence of post-dural puncture headache, the history of spinal anesthesia and PDPH, presence of headache, preeclampsia, migraine, sinusitis, caffeine withdraw, insertion site, repeated puncture attempts, direction of the needle, size of the needle, local anesthesic, perioperative hypotension, nausea and vomiting, amount of intravenous fluid were recorded. Results: There were 389 patients in the study. The incidence of PDPH was 14.65% (mild and moderate pain: 75.44%; severe pain 21.05%; worst pain: 3.51%). The risk factors were history of PDPH (OR = 4.5; 95% CI: 1.8 - 11.09), sinusitis (OR = 2.65; 95% CI: 1.10 - 6.36), local anesthesia (Marcain spinal 0.5% heavy) (OR = 6.66; 95% CI: 2.25 - 19.11), perioperative hypotension (OR = 2.42; 95% CI: 1.25 - 4.70). Conclusion: The incident of PDPH in women undergoing Cesarean section with spinal anesthesia was 14.65%. Four risk factors were the history of PDPH, sinusitis, local anesthesia (Marcain spinal 0.5% heavy) and perioperative hypotension. Key words: post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), Cesarean section, spinal anesthesia


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document