scholarly journals Clinical effects of trimebutine maleate dispersible tablets combined with polyethylene glycol 4000 powder in treatment of constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (27) ◽  
pp. 2491-2494
Author(s):  
Wen-Qin Yu ◽  
Ning-Xin Xuan
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175628481989753 ◽  
Author(s):  
William D. Chey ◽  
Eric D. Shah ◽  
Herbert L. DuPont

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder with a multifactorial pathophysiology. The gut microbiota differs between patients with IBS and healthy individuals. After a bout of acute gastroenteritis, postinfection IBS may result in up to approximately 10% of those affected. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is more common in patients with IBS than in healthy individuals, and eradication of SIBO with systemic antibiotics has decreased symptoms of IBS in some patients with IBS and SIBO. The nonsystemic (i.e. low oral bioavailability) antibiotic rifaximin is indicated in the United States and Canada for the treatment of adults with IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D). The efficacy and safety of 2-week single and repeat courses of rifaximin have been demonstrated in randomized, placebo-controlled studies of adults with IBS. Rifaximin is widely thought to exert its beneficial clinical effects in IBS-D through manipulation of the gut microbiota. However, current studies indicate that rifaximin induces only modest effects on the gut microbiota of patients with IBS-D, suggesting that the efficacy of rifaximin may involve other mechanisms. Indeed, preclinical data reveal a potential role for rifaximin in the modulation of inflammatory cytokines and intestinal permeability, but these two findings have not yet been examined in the context of clinical studies. The mechanism of action of rifaximin in IBS is likely multifactorial, and further study is needed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Yuhong Zhou ◽  
Shutang Han ◽  
Yamin He

Background. Tongxieyaofang (TXYF), a prescription originated from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), has been widely used on treating Diarrhea Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-D). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate whether TXYF was effective and safe for IBS-D. Methods. We searched seven electronic databases including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, PubMed, CNKI, VIP, CBM, and Wanfang Data up to 26 July 2017. Randomized controlled trails (RCTs) were eligible, regardless of blinding. Risk of bias of included trials was evaluated according to the Cochrane Handbook. Results. The total number of participants analyzed in the meta-analysis was 3062, of which 1556 received TXYF, while 1506 received ordinary treatment. The primary outcome was clinical effective rate. Compared with conventional medication which included probiotics, pinaverium bromide, trimebutine, and Oryzanol, TXYF significantly improved the clinical effective rate (n=37, OR: 4.61; 95% CI: 3.67–5.78; P < 0.00001) and decreased the adverse events (n=10, OR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.08–0.86; P = 0.03). There was not significant association with the score of abdominal pain, defecating frequency, fecal property, and total symptom. Conclusions. We suggested a moderate recommendation for TXYF on IBS-D, due to the fact that the risk of bias of the finally included trails was not high. Considering that all identified studies were not of high qualities and large samples, further rigorously designed and large scale RCTs were necessary to improve the applicability of our study results.


2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Soifer ◽  
José Tawil ◽  
Alejandro Rey ◽  
Laura Solé ◽  
Silvia Bernstein

Introduction. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) accounts for a significant deterioration in the quality of life of patients who suffer from it and is a common reason for consultation in gastroenterology. The treatment of this syndrome includes a wide variety of medications and recommendations based on different factors of its physiopathology. However, the results are usually variable and sometimes unsatisfactory for either the patient or the treating physician. The main objective of the present work is to describe the different treatments used by gastroenterologists in the management of IBS in Argentina. Materials and methods. Questionnaire of forty-seven questions, prepared by experts, distributed by medical associations of gastroenterology in Argentina and answered by specialists via Google Forms. Results. 304 responses, 157 from women (51.6%) and 147 from men (48.4%). The mean age was 44 and 49.9 years, respectively. 87.5% consider improvement of quality of life as the main goal of treatment. Regarding physiopathology of diarrhea variant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D), 49.5% considered emotional stress, while for constipation variant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C), 42.8% considered it multifactorial, with a predominance of slow colonic transit. No treatment option was rated as very effective by more than 50% of the respondents. Rifaximin was considered the most effective treatment in IBS-D, while polyethylene glycol was for IBS-C. Statistical significant differences were observed among gastroenterology subspecialties in the treatment of IBS-D with respect to the efficacy of diet, amitriptyline and antibiotics other than rifaximin, and regarding the effectiveness for bisacodyl/picosulfate and antibiotics in the treatment of IBS-C. Conclusion. The most common pathophysiological mechanismin IBS-D is stress. The vast majority of respondents consider that the main goal of treatment is the improvement of the quality of life, over symptomatic relief. None of the drugs is considered very effective in the treatment of the different IBS variants by at least 50% of those surveyed. Statistically significant differences were observed in the proportion of monthly consultations for IBS regarding to age and in the effectiveness considered for some treatments in relation to the subspecialty of physicians. The therapeutic approach to IBS by Argentine gastroenterologists is varied and somewhat heterogeneous, resulting in a still inappropriate management of this condition.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seok-Jae Ko ◽  
Gajin Han ◽  
Seul-Ki Kim ◽  
Jae-Gu Seo ◽  
Won-Seok Chung ◽  
...  

Introduction. Although combination therapy with herbal medicine and probiotics is gaining popularity for controlling diarrhea-dominant irritable bowel syndrome (D-IBS) symptoms, few studies have investigated its clinical effects.Materials and Methods. Fifty-three patients with D-IBS were randomly allocated into 1 of the following 4 groups: herbal medicine (Gwakhyangjeonggisan; GJS) plus probiotics (Duolac7S; DUO), GJS plus placebo DUO, placebo GJS plus DUO, and placebo GJS plus placebo DUO. The study period consisted of a 2-week run-in, 8 weeks of administration, and 2 weeks of follow-up. The primary outcomes were weekly adequate relief (AR) of overall IBS symptoms and the proportion of responders (PR) during the administration period. The secondary outcomes included individual IBS symptoms, stool assessment, and quality of life. Changes of intestinal microbiota and intestinal permeability were also analyzed.Results and Discussion. Weekly AR was not different among the 4 groups throughout the treatment period. However, the 3 treatment groups exhibited significant improvements in PR compared to the findings in the placebo group. In the intestinal microbiota assessment, herbal medicine and probiotics synergistically increased beneficial bacteria counts.Conclusion. Combination therapy with herbal medicine and probiotics appears to relieve overall IBS symptoms by synergistically increasing beneficial intestinal microbe counts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document