Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Pathologic Complete Response and Survival after Long-Term Follow-Up.

Author(s):  
S. Guiu ◽  
L. Arnould ◽  
B. Coudert ◽  
M. Liégard ◽  
F. Mayer ◽  
...  
Oncotarget ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (41) ◽  
pp. 26406-26416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Santonja ◽  
Alfonso Sánchez-Muñoz ◽  
Ana Lluch ◽  
Maria Rosario Chica-Parrado ◽  
Joan Albanell ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 767-781
Author(s):  
Manikandan Dhanushkodi ◽  
Velusamy Sridevi ◽  
Viswanathan Shanta ◽  
Ranganathan Rama ◽  
Rajaraman Swaminathan ◽  
...  

PURPOSE There are sparse data on the outcome of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). This report is on the prognostic factors and long-term outcome from Cancer Institute, Chennai. METHODS This is an analysis of untreated patients with LABC (stages IIIA-C) who were treated from January 2006 to December 2013. RESULTS Of the 4,577 patients with breast cancer who were treated, 2,137 patients (47%) with LABC were included for analysis. The median follow-up was 75 months (range, 1-170 months), and 2.3% (n = 49) were lost to follow-up at 5 years. The initial treatment was neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (NACR) (77%), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (15%), or others (8%). Patients with triple-negative breast cancer had a pathologic complete response (PCR) of 41%. The 10-year overall survival was for stage IIIA (65.1%), stage IIIB (41.2%), and stage IIIC (26.7%). Recurrence of cancer was observed in 27% of patients (local 13% and distant 87%). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with a tumor size > 10 cm (hazard ratio [HR], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.62 to 2.98; P = .001), hormone receptor negativity (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.72; P = .001), treatment modality (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.73; P = .001), lack of PCR (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.85 to 3.02; P = .001), and the presence of lymphovascular invasion (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.60 to 2.44; P = .001) had decreased overall survival. CONCLUSION NACR was feasible in inoperable LABC and gave satisfactory long-term survival. PCR was significantly higher in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The tumor size > 10 cm was significantly associated with inferior survival. However, this report acknowledges the limitations inherent in experience of management of LABC from a single center.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Foluso O. Ademuyiwa ◽  
Matthew J. Ellis ◽  
Cynthia X. Ma

Systemic treatment for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC: negative for the expression of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor and HER2 amplification) has been limited to chemotherapy options. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy induces tumor shrinkage and improves the surgical outcomes of patients with locally advanced disease and also identifies those at high risk of disease relapse despite today’s standard of care. By using pathologic complete response as a surrogate endpoint, novel treatment strategies can be efficiently assessed. Tissue analysis in the neoadjuvant setting is also an important research tool for the identification of chemotherapy resistance mechanisms and new therapeutic targets. In this paper, we review data on completed and ongoing neoadjuvant clinical trials in patients with TNBC and discuss treatment controversies that face clinicians and researchers when neoadjuvant chemotherapy is employed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11543-e11543
Author(s):  
Jose Ignacio Chacon ◽  
Ana Rosa Rubio Salvador(2) ◽  
Nazaret Cordero Franco(1) ◽  
Begona Martinez Carrasco (1) ◽  
Sonia Alonso Soler(1) ◽  
...  

e11543 Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an anthracycline resistant subtype, for which there is no standard chemotherapy. Taxanes, platinum-derived drugs and bevacizumab all seem to be active drugs in this setting, but definitive data are still lacking. Our purpose is to report our experience with the combination Docetaxel-Carboplatin-Bevacizumab (TCV) in TNBC. Methods: We retrospectively analysed our database using medical claims for patients diagnosed with TNBC and treated with TCV in neoadjuvant (NAJ) or metastasic( MD), between July 1, 2009, and December 31, 2011. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. Results: 13 pts have received 86 TCV cycles, 8 in NAJ and 5 for MD. NAJ: Median age: 48(28-60) y. T3-T4 tumors: 62,5% . N+: 62.5%. All pts received 6 TCV cycles, except 1 pt, still on therapy. 5 (62.5%) pts received quadrantectomy, 2(25%) mastectomy as surgical treatment after TCV. One pt has not received surgery yet. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was done in 5/8 (62.5%) pts, the other 3 received axillary dissection for clinically N+ metastasis. After surgery, pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast in 6/7 pts (85.7%); in axillary nodes, pCR in 5/7 pts (71,4%). One has not been surgically evaluated yet. Median follow-up: 10 months (2-18). Only one pt has relapsed with cerebral metastasis. MD: Median age: 54.4 (40-71) y. 4 pts received TCV as first line, one as third line therapy. 3 pts obtained complete response, 2 partial responses, but both progressed in three months. Median follow-up: 14.4 months. Only one of these pts has died. Toxicity: Was mild, without any grade 3 or 4 toxic effect. Only one pt showed grade 2 hypertension after bevacizumab infusion. Neutropenia was not evaluable for use of G-CSF per protocol. Conclusions: Although this is a short series, it suggests that TCV may be a highly active combination in TNBC with a good tolerability profile. These data warrant continuing testing of this combination in TNBC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document