scholarly journals Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC): Real-World Outcome of Patients From Cancer Institute, Chennai

2021 ◽  
pp. 767-781
Author(s):  
Manikandan Dhanushkodi ◽  
Velusamy Sridevi ◽  
Viswanathan Shanta ◽  
Ranganathan Rama ◽  
Rajaraman Swaminathan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced

PURPOSE There are sparse data on the outcome of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). This report is on the prognostic factors and long-term outcome from Cancer Institute, Chennai. METHODS This is an analysis of untreated patients with LABC (stages IIIA-C) who were treated from January 2006 to December 2013. RESULTS Of the 4,577 patients with breast cancer who were treated, 2,137 patients (47%) with LABC were included for analysis. The median follow-up was 75 months (range, 1-170 months), and 2.3% (n = 49) were lost to follow-up at 5 years. The initial treatment was neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (NACR) (77%), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (15%), or others (8%). Patients with triple-negative breast cancer had a pathologic complete response (PCR) of 41%. The 10-year overall survival was for stage IIIA (65.1%), stage IIIB (41.2%), and stage IIIC (26.7%). Recurrence of cancer was observed in 27% of patients (local 13% and distant 87%). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with a tumor size > 10 cm (hazard ratio [HR], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.62 to 2.98; P = .001), hormone receptor negativity (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.72; P = .001), treatment modality (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.73; P = .001), lack of PCR (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.85 to 3.02; P = .001), and the presence of lymphovascular invasion (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.60 to 2.44; P = .001) had decreased overall survival. CONCLUSION NACR was feasible in inoperable LABC and gave satisfactory long-term survival. PCR was significantly higher in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The tumor size > 10 cm was significantly associated with inferior survival. However, this report acknowledges the limitations inherent in experience of management of LABC from a single center.

A phase II trial of a neoadjuvant platinum-containing regimen for locally advanced breast cancer: Pathologic response, long-term follow-up, and correlation with biomarkers

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11510-e11510
Author(s):  
T. N. Shenkier ◽  
M. Hayes ◽  
K. A. Gelmon ◽  
S. Chia ◽  
C. Bajdik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Double Negative ◽  
Negative Group

e11510 Background: To determine the response, tolerability, and long-term outcome of a neoadjuvant platinum-containing regimen for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). To search for correlation between pathologic complete response (pCR) and predefined biomarkers in this cohort. Patients and Methods: Patients with LABC received eight cycles of either sequence A or B. Sequence A was doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (AT) q3w X 4 followed by cisplatin (C) 60 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 (CT) q2w X 4. Sequence B was CT x 4 followed by AT x 4. In addition to estrogen receptor and HER2, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MDR-1, MRP-1, topoisomerase IIα(topoIIα) and p53 was performed. Results: 88 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Median follow-up was 97 months. The overall pCR rate was 21.5%. For subgroups ER+/HER2-, HER2 +, and double negative (ER-/ HER2-) disease the pCR was 5.9%,23.3% and 35% respectively, p=0.006. Five year(y) overall survival for the entire cohort was 71.1%. Five y overall survival was 88.1% (CI 77.1%, 99.1%) for the ER positive HER2 negative group compared to 68.5% (CI 51.3%, 85.7%) and 49.5 (CI 27.4%, 71.6%) in the HER2 positive and “double negative” group respectively (p=0.0077). Over-expression of topo IIα was correlated with pCR (p<0.001). There were no toxic deaths. Conclusions: A platinum-containing neoadjuvant regimen was well tolerated and achieved a pCR rate which compares favorably to other recent studies of multi-agent chemotherapy. Further studies tailored for specific breast cancer subtypes are required. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Predicting Pathologic Responsive to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer by Radiomics of Multiparametric MR

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
nannan Lu ◽  
jie Dong ◽  
xin Fang ◽  
lufang Wang ◽  
wei Jia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Adc Values

Abstract Background:Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer was short of recognized treatment scheme and prediction factor. Diffusion weighted magnetic imaging can predict treatment response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods:Fifty patients of breast cancer (mean age, 48.7 years) with stage II-III who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative MRI were retrospectively evaluated between 2016 and 2020. Association between preoperative breast MRI findings or clinicopathological features and effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were studied. Risk factors were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results:Multivariate logistics regression analysis showed that clinical stage (OR, 0.104; 95% CI: 0.021, 0.516; p=0.006) at baseline and standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) change (OR, 9.865; 95% CI: 1.024, 95.021; p=0.048) were predictive factors of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The percentage of standard ADC value increasing in pCR group was larger than that in non-pCR group at first time point (p<0.05). The AUC of ROC curve was 0.828 (95% CI: 0.681, 0.975; p<0.05). In pCR group, change of standard ADC values was greater compared with that in tumor size at first follow-up (p<0.05). It was correlation between change of standard ADC values and tumor diameter at first follow-up (r, 0.438; p<0.05). Triple-negative patients in pCR group had higher change of standard ADC values than that in non-pCR groupat first follow-up (p>0.05).Conclusion:Standard ADC values change, clinical stage at baseline were closely related to the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The change of standard ADC values advanced reduction of tumor size at first follow-up and can predict effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the early stage.

Survival of patients with locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant platinum-containing chemotherapy: Experience of a single institute.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 274-274
Author(s):  
E. A. Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Pathological Complete Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Biological Entity ◽  
Breast Cancers

274 Background: Primary systemic chemotherapy is a standard approach to treating women with locally advanced breast cancers, with higher survival rates reported among patients who attain a pathologic complete response. Triple-negative breast cancer is a special biological entity that remains major challenge to oncologist. Around 12%-20% of breast cancers are triple negative. The current phase II study was conducted to evaluate the pathological complete response (pCR) using cis-platinum containing regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced triple negative breast cancer. Methods: Eighteen women with stage III triple negative breast cancer who were recruited between July 2007 and February 2010 at King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted of 4 cycles of AC or FEC 100, followed by 4 cycles consisted of docetaxel-cisplatin every 3 weeks. Primary end point was pathological complete response. Results: Median age: 49 y (24-70); premenopausal: 16; 25% were below 35 years of age; Median tumor size: 9 cm (3.5-19); Grade III: 15; Stage IIIA: 3, IIIB:14, IIIC:1; all but 2 had positive nodes at diagnosis (89%). Clinical evaluation of response by RECIST criteria pre surgery: OR: 17/18 (94%), CR: 9 (50%); PR: 8 (44%).The second sequence with D-Cis-T doubled the rate of clinical CR obtained with AC/FEC. One patient was not operated due to disease progression. Pathological assessment, revealed that 8 (47%) pts had no residual invasive carcinoma in the breast; 3 (18%) had residual occasional scattered tumor cells less than 5 mm (pT1a); 10 (59%) had negative nodes; 8 achieved CpR and 2 nCpR. Patients with residual invasive component and/or nodal involvement had high baseline Ki 67 level. After a median follow up of 24 months, cumulative overall survival at 24 months is 88.9% for whole group. Cumulative overall survival in relation to response was 100% for patients who achieved pCR while overall cumulative survival rate for patients without pCR was 83.3% without statistical significance. Conclusions: This cisplatin based neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen was well tolerated and achieved a high rate of pCR/npCR.

Differential response to primary chemotherapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10519-10519 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Liedtke ◽  
C. Mazouni ◽  
K. R. Hess ◽  
A. Tordai ◽  
F. André ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Nuclear Grade ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
High Nuclear Grade

10519 Objective. Triple-negative breast cancer is defined as a subtype of invasive breast cancer which lacks estrogen and progesterone receptor expression as well as HER2/neu expression and is highly similar to the basal-like subtype defined by gene expression profiling. Method. 1,143 patients treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center in neoadjuvant trials were included in a retrospective comparative analysis between triple-negative tumors and non-triple-negative tumors for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as long- term survival. Results. 827/1,143 (72%) patients had received taxanes, either as a single-agent (n=60) or in combination with anthracycline (n=767), whereas the remainder patients received an anthracycline-only chemotherapy. Overall 258/1,143 (23%) tumors were triple- negative. Complete pathological response (pCR) was achieved in 63/257 (25%) patients with triple-negative tumors compared to 99/888 (11%) in patients with non-triple-negative tumors (odds ratio [OR] 1.14, 95%CI: 1.09–1.20, p=.0082). Triple-negative status correlated significantly with high nuclear grade (p<.0001), whereas no significant correlation with any established clinicopathologic parameter was observed. However, 5-year overall survival (5yrOS) was 66% in the triple-negative group compared to 83% in the non-triple-negative control group (OR 2.1, 95%CI: 1.6–2.8, p<.0001). In multivariate analyses, triple-negative status (hazard ratio [HR] 2.0, 95%CI: 1.4–2.8, p<.0001), high nuclear grade, increased tumor size (HR 1.5, 95%CI: 1.3–1.8, p<.0001), positive nodal status (HR 1.4, 95%CI: 1.2–1.7, p=.0002) and high nuclear grade (HR 1.7, 95%CI: 1.1- 2.4, p=.0089) were significantly associated with decreased 5yrOS. When survival was analyzed according to both response rate and triple negative status, achievement of pCR was a stronger predictor of survival compared to triple-negative status. Conclusion. Triple- negative expression status among patients with breast cancer constitutes an independent unfavorable prognostic factor with regards to overall survival unless achieving pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Therapy in Operable Breast Cancer: Application to Triple Negative Breast Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Foluso O. Ademuyiwa ◽  
Matthew J. Ellis ◽  
Cynthia X. Ma
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Chemotherapy Resistance ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Surrogate Endpoint ◽  
Complete Response

Systemic treatment for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC: negative for the expression of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor and HER2 amplification) has been limited to chemotherapy options. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy induces tumor shrinkage and improves the surgical outcomes of patients with locally advanced disease and also identifies those at high risk of disease relapse despite today’s standard of care. By using pathologic complete response as a surrogate endpoint, novel treatment strategies can be efficiently assessed. Tissue analysis in the neoadjuvant setting is also an important research tool for the identification of chemotherapy resistance mechanisms and new therapeutic targets. In this paper, we review data on completed and ongoing neoadjuvant clinical trials in patients with TNBC and discuss treatment controversies that face clinicians and researchers when neoadjuvant chemotherapy is employed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document