scholarly journals Know Your Value: Negotiation Skill Development for Junior Investigators in the Academic Environment—A Report from the American Society of Preventive Oncology's Junior Members Interest Group

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 1144-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison M. Burton-Chase ◽  
Maria C. Swartz ◽  
Stephanie A.N. Silvera ◽  
Karen Basen-Engquist ◽  
Faith E. Fletcher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interest Group ◽  
Skill Development ◽  
Academic Environment ◽  
Negotiation Skill ◽  
American Society ◽  
Value Negotiation

scholarly journals Job Talks and Interviews: How to Stand Out and Fit In: A Report from the American Society of Preventive Oncology Junior Members Interest Group

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 224-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine W. Reeves ◽  
Parisa Tehranifar ◽  
Tracy E. Crane ◽  
Linda K. Ko ◽  
Carrie Cameron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interest Group ◽  
American Society

scholarly journals The Idea of Effective International Law: Continuing the Discussion

AJIL Unbound ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 91-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay Padmanabhan
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Annual Meeting ◽  
Interest Group ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Empirical Question ◽  
Biennial Conference ◽  
American Society

The joint 108th American Society of International Law (ASIL) Annual Meeting and 76th International Law Association (ILA) Biennial Conference was organized under the theme “The Effectiveness of International Law.” In conjunction with this theme, the ASIL Legal Theory Interest Group hosted a panel discussion exploring the theoretical dimensions of the concept of “effectiveness” as understood in international law. Panelists discussed three related questions: (1)Is the effectiveness of international law an empirical question measured through evaluating compliance with international legal norms?(2)What conceptions of effectiveness might exist beyond compliance? Could such conceptions be captured in theoretical or moral terms?(3)Why is international law concerned with effectiveness at all?

scholarly journals Charting a Strategic Direction for the American Society of Preventive Oncology's Survivorship Interest Group

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 1912-1913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Trentham-Dietz ◽  
Diana S.M. Buist ◽  
Kimberly M. Kelly ◽  
Judith S. Jacobson ◽  
Electra Paskett
Keyword(s):  
Interest Group ◽  
Strategic Direction ◽  
American Society

Becoming a Negotiator: A Proposed Negotiation Skill Development Complexity Model

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (1) ◽  
pp. 11509
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Foster Clenney ◽  
Todd J. Maurer ◽  
Edward W. Miles
Keyword(s):  
Skill Development ◽  
Negotiation Skill

A Shared Vision of Healthcare Quality Improvement

2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 582-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Birnbaum ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Interest Group ◽  
Rapid Growth ◽  
Special Interest ◽  
Healthcare Quality ◽  
Shared Vision ◽  
Healthcare Quality Improvement ◽  
Common Concern ◽  
American Society

AbstractSHEA and the American Society for Quality's Health Care Division have been collaborating in areas of common concern to improve healthcare quality. We each possess a heritage of different but complementary approaches and stand a better chance of success together than apart. This presentation describes rapid growth of our interdisciplinary, international, special interest group and progress made thus far, as well as challenges facing hospital epidemiologists and quality improvement professionals.

Toward Strategic Human Skill Development Through Human and Agent Interaction: Improving Negotiation Skill by Interacting with Bargaining Agent

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 831-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Otaki ◽  
◽  
Kiyohiko Hattori ◽  
Keiki Takadama
Keyword(s):  
Human Subject ◽  
Skill Development ◽  
Profit Maximization ◽  
Bargaining Games ◽  
Negotiation Skill ◽  
Computer Agent ◽  
Human Skill ◽  
Agent Interaction ◽  
Human Skills ◽  
Human Player

This paper focuses on developing human skills through interaction between a human player and a computer agent, and explores its strategic method through experiments on the bargaining games where human players negotiate with computer agents. Specifically, human players negotiate with three types of agents: (a) strong/weak attitude agents making aggressive/defensive proposals in advantageous/disadvantageous situations; (b) fair agents making fair proposals; and (c) the “human-like” agents making mutually agreeable proposals as the number of games increases. Analysis of the human subject experiments has revealed the three major implications: (1) human players negotiating with the strong/weak attitude agents obtain the largest profit overall; (2) human players negotiating with “human-like” agents win many games; and (3) no relationship exists between profit maximization and a win of the games.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document