Radiomics Signature on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Association with Disease-Free Survival in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (19) ◽  
pp. 4705-4714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyunjin Park ◽  
Yaeji Lim ◽  
Eun Sook Ko ◽  
Hwan-ho Cho ◽  
Jeong Eon Lee ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lang Xiong ◽  
Haolin Chen ◽  
Xiaofeng Tang ◽  
Biyun Chen ◽  
Xinhua Jiang ◽  
...  

BackgroundAccurate prediction of recurrence is crucial for personalized treatment in breast cancer, and whether the radiomics features of ultrasound (US) could be used to predict recurrence of breast cancer is still uncertain. Here, we developed a radiomics signature based on preoperative US to predict disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with invasive breast cancer and assess its additional value to the clinicopathological predictors for individualized DFS prediction.MethodsWe identified 620 patients with invasive breast cancer and randomly divided them into the training (n = 372) and validation (n = 248) cohorts. A radiomics signature was constructed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression in the training cohort and validated in the validation cohort. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis were used to determine the association of the radiomics signature and clinicopathological variables with DFS. To evaluate the additional value of the radiomics signature for DFS prediction, a radiomics nomogram combining the radiomics signature and clinicopathological predictors was constructed and assessed in terms of discrimination, calibration, reclassification, and clinical usefulness.ResultsThe radiomics signature was significantly associated with DFS, independent of the clinicopathological predictors. The radiomics nomogram performed better than the clinicopathological nomogram (C-index, 0.796 vs. 0.761) and provided better calibration and positive net reclassification improvement (0.147, P = 0.035) in the validation cohort. Decision curve analysis also demonstrated that the radiomics nomogram was clinically useful.ConclusionUS radiomics signature is a potential imaging biomarker for risk stratification of DFS in invasive breast cancer, and US-based radiomics nomogram improved accuracy of DFS prediction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 98-103
Author(s):  
Gamze Durhan ◽  
Ahmet Poker ◽  
Emil Settarzade ◽  
Jale Karakaya ◽  
Kemal Kösemehmetoğlu ◽  
...  

Breast Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-175
Author(s):  
Frederik Cuperjani ◽  
Lumturije Gashi ◽  
Fisnik Kurshumliu ◽  
Shemsedin Dreshaj ◽  
Fitim Selimi

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of ribosomal protein (RP) S6-pS240 in non-special type invasive breast cancer in relation to other prognostic markers and gain new insights to facilitate more individualized treatment. Methods: The following clinical and histopathological parameters of 120 patients were determined: S6-pS240 expression, age, menopausal status, tumor size and grade, TNM stage, Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI), lymph node stage, estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER/PR) expression, HER2/neu amplification, lymphovascular invasion, and proliferative index as measured by Ki-67. Treatment protocol and disease-free survival were evaluated accordingly. Results: Significant positive correlations were seen between S6-pS240 expression and Ki-67 values (rho = 0.530, p < 0.001), and NPI (rho = 0.370, p < 0.001) and HER2/neu amplification (rho = 0.368, p < 0.001). A negative correlation was found between S6-pS240 and ER/PR expression (rho = 0.362, p < 0.001). Patients with negative RP S6-pS240 expression had significantly longer disease-free survival (log-rank test, p = 0.005). Conclusion: Immunohistochemical analysis of RP S6-pS240 is a valuable additional prognostic marker in patients with invasive breast cancer. Routine use of S6-pS240 immunohistochemistry is recommended.


Tumor Biology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 330-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nagendra K. Prasad ◽  
Manish Tandon ◽  
Anant Handa ◽  
George E. Moore ◽  
Charles F. Babbs ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 924-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin You Kim ◽  
Suck Hong Lee ◽  
Ji Won Lee ◽  
Suk Kim ◽  
Ki Seok Choo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document