e13051 Background: Cost-effectiveness analysis is important in healthcare, especially in Japan, where preventive measures for carriers of BRCA 1/2 mutations are not covered by health insurance. Methods: We developed Markov models in a simulated cohort of women aged 35–70, and compared outcomes of surveillance with risk-reducing mastectomy at age 35 (RRM), risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy at age 45 (RRSO), and both (RRM&RRSO), with quality adjustment. We used breast and ovarian cancer incidence, and adverse event rates from previous studies, adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy rates from Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Registration 2015, mortality rates from the National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan Society of Clinical Oncology and Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and direct costs in 2016 Japanese yen from St. Luke’s International Hospital and Keio University Hospital. We used preference ratings for both of mutation carriers and controls (without known high risk) from a published study to adjust survival for quality of life (QALYs). Discount rate was 2%. Results: Compared with surveillance, RRSO and RRM & RRSO were dominant (cost-saving and more effective) and RRM was cost effective for BRCA 1 mutation carriers. RRM and RRM & RRSO were dominant, and RRSO was cost effective for BRCA 2 mutation carriers. Among four strategies including surveillance, RRM & RRSO was the most cost effective for BRCA 1 mutation carriers and RRM was the most cost effective for BRCA 2 mutation carriers based on preference ratings of controls. Conclusions: With quality adjustment, all the preventive strategies (RRM, RRSO and RRM&RRSO) were cost effective for BRCA 1 and 2. Using QALYs from the control group, RRM & RRSO for BRCA 1 and RRM for BRCA 2 were the most cost effective. We will use this result to promote insurance coverage for BRCA mutations carriers in Japan.
Organization and Running of the First Comprehensive Hereditary Cancer Clinic in India
