Management of Opioid-Induced Nausea and Emesis

2003 ◽  
pp. 113-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.R. Aparasu ◽  
A. Aparasu
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zekun Wang ◽  
Wenyang Liu ◽  
Jianghu Zhang ◽  
Xuesong Chen ◽  
Jingbo Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There is sparse research reporting effective interventions for preventing nausea and emesis caused by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). This phase Ⅱ trial was conducted to provide the direct evidence for the current practice of prescribing antiemetic in patients with LA-HNSCC receiving CCRT.Methods Treatment-naïve LA-HNSCC patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concomitant cisplatin 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks for two cycles. All patients were given orally aprepitant 125 mg once on d1, then 80mg once on d2-5; ondansetron 8 mg once on d1; and dexamethasone 12 mg once on d1, then 8mg on d2-5. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR). Pursuant to δ=0.2 and α=0.05, the expected CR rate was 80%. Results A total of 43 patients with LA-HNSCC were enrolled. The median age was 53 years old, and 86.0% were male. All patients received radiotherapy and 86.0% of patients completed both cycles as planned. The overall CR rate was 86.0% (95% CI: 72.1-94.7). The CR rates for cycles 1 and 2 were 88.4% (95% CI: 74.9-96.1) and 89.2% (95% CI: 74.6-97.0). The complete protection rate in the overall phase was 72.1% (95% CI: 56.3-84.7). The emesis-free response and nausea-free response in overall phase were 88.4% (95% CI: 74.9-96.1) and 60.5% (95% CI: 44.4-75.0), respectively. The adverse events related to antiemetics were constipation (65.1%) and hiccups (16.3%), but both were grade 1-2. There was no grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse event with antiemetic usage. Conclusion The addition of aprepitant into ondansetron and dexamethasone provided effective protection from nausea and emesis in patients with LA-HNSCC receiving radiotherapy and concomitant high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy. Randomised phase 3 studies are required to further define the potential role of NK1RA in chemoradiotherapy setting.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03572829. Registered 28 June 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03572829?term=NCT03572829&draw=2&rank=1.



2005 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Topal ◽  
M. Kaya ◽  
N. Gül
Keyword(s):  






2018 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Marx ◽  
Alexandra McCarthy ◽  
Skye Marshall ◽  
Megan Crichton ◽  
Alex Molassiotis ◽  
...  


1985 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
S B Strum ◽  
J E McDermed ◽  
D F Liponi

We tested the safety and antiemetic effectiveness of intravenous (IV) dexamethasone (DXM) as an adjunct to high-dose IV metoclopramide (MCP) to prevent nausea and vomiting induced by high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy. Response was determined by using objective and subjective criteria. Thirty patients were randomly assigned to receive MCP alone at a dose of 2 mg/kg IV for three doses or the same dose of MCP plus 20 mg of DXM IV for three doses. Twenty evaluable patients received a second course of cisplatin and were crossed over to the opposite arm. Study results did not show a statistically significant advantage of combination MCP plus DXM over MCP alone using strict objective criteria for antiemetic response. However, patients subjectively preferred MCP plus DXM over MCP alone by nearly a 6:1 ratio, regardless of the randomization sequence. Although the addition of DXM does not appear to objectively improve emetic protection with high-dose MCP, we recommend MCP plus DXM to prevent nausea and vomiting induced by high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy when the use of steroids is not contraindicated, in view of patient preference for the combination.





1993 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 413-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ismo T. Jantunen ◽  
Martti K. Flander ◽  
Mirja I. Heikkinen ◽  
Tapio A. Kuoppala ◽  
Lase Teerenhovi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document