A Comparison of the Diagnostic Sensitivity of MRI, CBF-SPECT, FDG-PET and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers for Detecting Alzheimer’s Disease in a Memory Clinic

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiyoshi Morinaga ◽  
Kenjiro Ono ◽  
Tokuhei Ikeda ◽  
Yoshihisa Ikeda ◽  
Keisuke Shima ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0248413
Author(s):  
Le Gjerum ◽  
Birgitte Bo Andersen ◽  
Marie Bruun ◽  
Anja Hviid Simonsen ◽  
Otto Mølby Henriksen ◽  
...  

Background The two biomarkers 2-[18F]FDG-PET and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers are both recommended to support the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. However, there is a lack of knowledge for the comparison of the two biomarkers in a routine clinical setting. Objective The aim was to compare the clinical impact of 2-[18F]FDG-PET and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers on diagnosis, prognosis, and patient management in patients suspected of Alzheimer’s disease. Methods Eighty-one patients clinically suspected of Alzheimer’s disease were retrospectively included from the Copenhagen Memory Clinic. As part of the clinical work-up all patients had a standard diagnostic program examination including MRI and ancillary investigations with 2-[18F]FDG-PET and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. An incremental study design was used to evaluate the clinical impact of the biomarkers. First, the diagnostic evaluation was based on the standard diagnostic program, then the diagnostic evaluation was revised after addition of either cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers or 2-[18F]FDG-PET. At each diagnostic evaluation, two blinded dementia specialists made a consensus decision on diagnosis, prediction of disease course, and change in patient management. Confidence in the decision was measured on a visual analogue scale (0–100). After 6 months, the diagnostic evaluation was performed with addition of the other biomarker. A clinical follow-up after 12 months was used as reference for diagnosis and disease course. Results The two biomarkers had a similar clinical value across all diagnosis when added individually to the standard diagnostic program. However, for the correctly diagnosed patient with Alzheimer’s disease cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers had a significantly higher impact on diagnostic confidence (mean scores±SD: 88±11 vs. 82±11, p = 0.046) and a significant reduction in the need for ancillary investigations (23 vs. 18 patients, p = 0.049) compared to 2-[18F]FDG-PET. Conclusion The two biomarkers had similar clinical impact on diagnosis, but cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers had a more significant value in corroborating the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease compared to 2-[18F]FDG-PET.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Jagan A. Pillai ◽  
James Bena ◽  
Lynn M. Bekris ◽  
Nancy Foldvary-Schaefer ◽  
Catherine Heinzinger ◽  
...  

Sleep dysfunction has been identified in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD); however, the role and mechanism of circadian rhythm dysfunction is less well understood. In a well-characterized cohort of patients with AD at the mild cognitive impairment stage (MCI-AD), we identify that circadian rhythm irregularities were accompanied by altered humoral immune responses detected in both the cerebrospinal fluid and plasma as well as alterations of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of neurodegeneration. On the other hand, sleep disruption was more so associated with abnormalities in circulating markers of immunity and inflammation and decrements in cognition.


2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 820-827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Van Patten ◽  
Anne M. Fagan ◽  
David A.S. Kaufman

Background: There exists a need for more sensitive measures capable of detecting subtle cognitive decline due to Alzheimer's disease. Objective: To advance the literature in Alzheimer’s disease by demonstrating that performance on a cued-Stroop task is impacted by preclinical Alzheimer's disease neuropathology. Method: Twenty-nine cognitively asymptomatic older adults completed a computerized, cued-Stroop task in which accuracy rates and intraindividual variability in reaction times were the outcomes of interest. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Aβ42 and tau were measured and participants were then grouped according to a published p-tau/Aβ42 cutoff reflecting risk for Alzheimer’s disease (preclinical Alzheimer's disease = 14; control = 15). Results: ANOVAs indicated that accuracy rates did not differ between the groups but 4-second delay incongruent color-naming Stroop coefficient of variation reaction times were higher in the preclinical Alzheimer’s disease group compared to the control group, reflecting increased within-person variability. Moreover, partial correlations showed no relationships between cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and accuracy rates. However, increases in coefficient of variation reaction times correlated with decreased Aβ42 and increases in p-tau and the p-tau/Aβ42 ratio. Conclusion: Results supported the ability of the computerized, cued-Stroop task to detect subtle Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology using a small cohort of cognitively asymptomatic older adults. The ongoing measurement of cued-Stroop coefficient of variation reaction times has both scientific and clinical utility in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease.


2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 971-984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine L. Tardif ◽  
Gabriel A. Devenyi ◽  
Robert S. C. Amaral ◽  
Sandra Pelleieux ◽  
Judes Poirier ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document