scholarly journals A Phase II Trial of Fixed-Dose Rate Gemcitabine plus Capecitabine in Metastatic/Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Patients

Oncology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Santini ◽  
Vladimir Virzi ◽  
Enrico Vasile ◽  
Bruno Vincenzi ◽  
Vincenzo Catalano ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15510-e15510
Author(s):  
D. Santini ◽  
B. Vincenzi ◽  
E. Vasile ◽  
V. Catalano ◽  
V. Virzì ◽  
...  

e15510 Background: The combination of fixed dose rate (FDR) gemcitabine (C) and capecitabine (G) has been demonstrated to be well tolerated in patients with advanced cancers. To determine the activity and safety of this combination in metastatic metastatic biliary tract cancer patients, a phase II trial was conducted. Methods: Patients with unresectable BTC who had pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, no prior chemotherapy, ECOG PS < 2 and measurable disease were enrolled. Treatment consisted of FDR G at 800 mg/m(2) infused in 80 minutes on days 1 and 8 every 21 days with C administered orally bid in equal doses (650 mg/m2 bid) for 14 days (28 doses). Results: Between Feb 2005 and Sept 2008, 30 pts were enrolled. Median age was 67 (45–86) with 14 males. 30 pts were evaluable for response and toxicity. A total of 219 cycles were administered (median, 8; range, 2–16). One patient achieved CR and 8 pts achieved PR giving an overall response rate of 30.0% in intention-to-treat population (95% CI, 19.2–42.6%). And 11 pts (36.6%) had stable disease. The median time to progression of all patients was 7.4 months (mo) (95% CI, 3.2–19.5). The median overall survival was 15.3 mo (95% CI, 4.6–27.9). Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were noted in 13.3% and 6.6% of the pts, respectively. Grade 2/3 non-hematologic toxicities were asthenia (50.0 % of pts), diarrhea (16.6%), stomatitis (23.3%) and hand-foot syndrome (6.6%). There was no treatment-related death. Gemcitabine was skipped at least once/reduced in 20%/15% of the patients, respectively. Capecitabine was skipped at least once/reduced in 20%/25% of the patients, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of FDR gemcitabine and capecitabine in this three week cycle is safe and seems to have advantages in activity over other regimens in advanced biliary cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2017 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 1189-1196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Kobayashi ◽  
Makoto Ueno ◽  
Kazuya Sugimori ◽  
Chigusa Morizane ◽  
Yasushi Kojima ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Milella ◽  
Alain J. Gelibter ◽  
Maria Simona Pino ◽  
Giandominik Bossone ◽  
Paolo Marolla ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre M. Murad ◽  
Rodrigo C. Guimarães ◽  
Bruno C. Aragão ◽  
Víctor H. Rodrigues ◽  
Antonio O. Scalabrini-Neto ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (16_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4133-4133 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. O. Park ◽  
W. K. Kang ◽  
T.-Y. Kim ◽  
M. A. Lee ◽  
M.-J. Ahn ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15527-e15527 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Nakamura ◽  
T. Yamaguchi ◽  
K. Sudo ◽  
T. Hara ◽  
T. Denda ◽  
...  

e15527 Background: Optimal chemotherapy for unresectable biliary tract cancer is yet to be defined. We have conducted the phase II trial of Gemcitabine (GEM) with S-1, oral fluorouracil prodrug tegafur combined with two modulators, 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydropridine and potassium oxonate to evaluate the activity and toxicity of such combination in patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer. Methods: Eligibility criteria were pathologically-proven biliary tract cancer, appropriate performance status 0 to 2, age 20 to 79 years, adequate hematological, renal and liver functions, no prior chemotherapy, and written informed consent. S-1 was given orally (30mg/m2) bid for 14 consecutive days and GEM (1000mg/m2) was given on day 8 and 15. Cycle was repeated every 21 days. Results: 30 patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer (Gall-bladder: intrahepatic bile ducts: extrahepatic bile ducts=7:16:7) were enrolled from March 2007 to December 2008. Patients characteristics were: median age; 67 (46–79), male/female; 20/10, PS 0/1/2; 16/13/1. Median number of cycles was 8 (range 1 to 14). Out of total 26 evaluable patients, objective responses were observed in 9 patients (30%); 16 patients achieved stable disease and 1 patients showed disease progression. Median survival was 390 days (95% c.i.: 290 - 490 days). The grade 3–4 toxicities observed were leucopenia (20%), neutropenia (40%), anemia (17%), thrombocytopenia (37%), anorexia (7%), fever (10%), rash (7%) and interstitial pneumonia (7%). Conclusions: The combination chemotherapy with GEM and S-1 was well tolerated and high response rate has been observed. This result is very promising but survival benefit against GEM monotherapy should be demonstrated in future phase 3 studies. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15553-e15553
Author(s):  
J. Lee ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
T. Kim ◽  
J. Lee ◽  
D. Park ◽  
...  

e15553 Background: To determine the efficacy and safety of fixed dose rate (FDR) gemcitabine and capecitaibne (GX) combination chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed LAPA were eligible for this prospective phase II trial. Dynamic pancreas/pelvic CT, MRI and FDG-PET were undertaken to assess the resectability. EUS was also performed as needed basis. ‘Borderline resectable (BR)’ and ‘unresectable (UR)’ criteria developed by our pancreatico-biliary multidisciplinary management team (PBMMT) and NCCN criteria were used. After confirmation of resectability, patients received 3 cycles of FDR gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 on D1 and D8 and capecitabine 950 mg/m2 from D1-D14 every 3 weeks. Thereafter, staging was repeated and patients underwent surgery if the disease was not unresectable. For patients with R0 resection, additional 6 cycles of GX were administered. For patients with R1 resection, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (54 Gy over 5 weeks with concurrent 5-FU and leucovorin or capecitabine) followed by FDR-GX was administered. Patients with stable or better response to chemotherapy but assessed unresectable at reassessment received additional chemotherapy up to 9 cycles followed by CRT. Results: Between August 2006 and July 2008, 38 eligible patients (14 with BR and 24 with UR based on NCCN criteria; 29 with BR and 9 with UR based on our PBMMT criteria) entered on this study. The median age was 61 yo (42–76) and 71% had cT4 disease. The response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was PR in 6 (16%), SD in 26 (68%) and PD in 3 (8%). Metabolic response was achieved in 20 patients (53%) with 2 metabolic CR out of 31 evaluable patients. Grade 3 or worse adverse effects were mainly HFS (n=5) and gastrointestinal (n=3) with no grade 4 in severity. Surgery was performed in 9 patients (24.0%, R0=8, R1=1, 6 in NCCN-BR and 3 in NCCN-UR, 9 in PBMMT-BR) and five patients refused surgery although their diseases seemed not to be unresectable. The median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI, 8.3–10.4) and estimated median OS was 13.5 months (95% CI, 12.4- 14.5). Conclusions: FDR-GX was effective as neoadjuvnat chemotherapy in LAPA with favorable toxicity profile. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document