scholarly journals Metastatic Cancer of Cowper's Gland: A Rare Cancer Managed Successfully by Molecular Profiling

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E. Myers ◽  
Zoran Gatalica ◽  
Anthony Spinelli ◽  
Michael Castro ◽  
Erica Linden ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Seeber ◽  
Georges Chahine ◽  
Fadi Nasr ◽  
Andrew Dean ◽  
Mira Miranova ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11570-11570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Claud Chandler ◽  
Ari M. Vanderwalde ◽  
Bradley G. Somer ◽  
Gregory A. Vidal ◽  
Lee Steven Schwartzberg

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110015
Author(s):  
Mohammad Faraz Naqvi ◽  
Henry Hiep Vo ◽  
David Vining ◽  
Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou

Background: Patients with advanced and/or metastatic solid tumors have limited treatment options. Mutations that serve as biomarkers of carcinogenesis can be found in cell-free DNA of patients’ plasma. Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was developed as a non-invasive, cost-effective alternative to tumor biopsy when such biopsy is not technically feasible or it is associated with high risk for complications. The role of ctDNA in precision oncology is promising but its clinical significance across tumor types remains to be validated. We report a case series of three heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors who received matched targeted therapy based on ctDNA analysis and/or tumor molecular profiling. Case presentation: Three patients with advanced, metastatic cancer and the following characteristics are presented: a 71-year-old woman with ovarian cancer and BRCA2 mutation identified in ctDNA and tumor tissue was treated with a PARP inhibitor and achieved partial response by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) for 22.6+ months; a 40-year-old woman with adenoid cystic carcinoma of the parotid gland was treated with a MEK/RAF pathway inhibitor on the basis of RAF1 amplification on ctDNA analysis and had stable disease for 20.2 months; and a 56-year-old woman with breast cancer and a BRCA1 mutation identified by ctDNA analysis was treated with a PARP inhibitor and achieved stable disease for 9.1 months. All three patients are alive at the time of this report. Conclusions: These results suggest that ctDNA analysis can contribute to selection of targeted therapy in patients with advanced, metastatic cancer. Prospective clinical trials to evaluate and optimize ctDNA biomarkers, as well as the integration of novel and/or alternative targeted therapies, are warranted to fully assess the role of ctDNA analysis in cancer therapy. Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02152254). Registered May 28, 2014. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02152254 . MD Anderson protocol # PA12-1161 (approval ID IRB1 FWA00000121) and # PA11-0377 (approval ID IRB4 FWA00005015).


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11001-11001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoran Gatalica ◽  
Sherri Millis ◽  
Sting Chen ◽  
Gargi Dan Basu ◽  
Wenhsiang Wen ◽  
...  

11001 Background: Molecular profiling of both common and rare cancer types provides for the identification of actionable targets for chemotherapy with many unexpected associations. Methods: Caris Life Sciences database of >35,000 profiled cancers was reviewed for well-established driver gene mutations and copy number alterations, and protein expression patterns that are relevant for selection of targeted therapy. Based on the published literature, these tumor characteristics were then associated with potential benefit or no benefit to the specific therapeutic agents. All relevant published studies were evaluated using the USPSTF grading scheme for study design and validity. Assay methodologies included sequencing (Sanger, pyrosequencing), PCR, FISH, CISH, and immunohistochemistry. Results: All common malignancies (10 most common cancer types in men and women) and 10 rare cancer types were well represented (minimum of 100 cases in each individual cancer type). Well established driver mutations and protein expression in common cancers were all identified with expected frequencies (e.g. HER2 amplification in breast, PIK3CA mutations in ER+ breast cancer, EGFR mutations in NSCLC, etc.). Importantly, unexpected new and potentially actionable targets were identified in common (e.g., 6.7% HER2 amplification in NSCLC, 1.6% KRAS mutation in prostatic adenocarcinoma) and rare cancers (e.g., 8.3% ALK alteration in soft tissue sarcomas, 10.5% c-MET and 26.4% EGFR gene amplification in melanomas, 16.3% KRAS mutation in cholangiocarcinomas, 10% AR expression in STS), as well in cancers of unknown primary site (approximately 4% of all tested cases). Conclusions: This review of the large referral cancer profiling database provided an unparalleled insight in the distribution of common and rare genetic and protein alterations with direct and potential treatment implications. Numerous targets were discovered that had a potential to be treated by the conventional chemotherapy as well as targeted therapy not usually considered for the cancer type. Comparison between an individual patient tumor profile and database for the matched cancer type provides additional level of support for targeted treatment choices.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22132-e22132
Author(s):  
Herdee Gloriane Cristal Luna ◽  
Amherstia Morelos ◽  
Mary Milisa Catedral ◽  
Ana Lea Lava ◽  
April Love Malasig ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 138 ◽  
pp. S32
Author(s):  
M. Morfouace ◽  
I. Ray-Coquard ◽  
N. Girard ◽  
A. Stevovic ◽  
I. Treilleux ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 249-249
Author(s):  
Sachdev P. Thomas ◽  
Fadi S. Braiteh ◽  
Karen Ann Cherkis ◽  
Theresa N. Operana ◽  
Nichole Renee Blatner ◽  
...  

249 Background: Metastatic lesions with unknown (CUP), unclear, or differential diagnoses pose significant challenges, particularly when presenting in the GI tract, leading to suboptimal treatment and outcomes. In clinical studies, molecular classification with the 92-gene assay demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy compared to standard pathology techniques and improved survival in patients treated based on assay results. The current study assessed the utility of the 92-gene assay in diagnoses and treatment decision-making in clinical practice. Methods: Cases in which the 92-gene assay was ordered as part of routine clinical care were submitted into a study database via web-based, standardized, discipline-specific questionnaires. Utilization and impact of the assay were characterized for medical oncologists and pathologists. Physician-reported results from medical oncologists are included in this interim analysis of 134 cases. Results: Results from this registry-based reporting study showed that molecular profiling impacted treatment decisions in 53% of cases. Significantly, 46% of these cases reported a change in treatment regimen associated with integration of 92-gene assay results. Clinical scope included 18 tumor types with 52% having a molecular diagnosis of GI origin. The top 3 diagnoses were pancreaticobiliary, intestine, and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. The pre-assay working diagnosis was unknown in 41%, a differential diagnosis in 26%, and a single suspected site in 33% of cases. Conclusions: Findings from this study demonstrate that use of the 92-gene assay impacted treatment decisions and selection in a significant proportion of patients, and further define its role in clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment planning of diagnostically-challenging metastatic cancer. [Table: see text]


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 301-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Seeber ◽  
Guenther Gastl ◽  
Christian Ensinger ◽  
Gilbert Spizzo ◽  
Wolfgang Willenbacher ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document