Insights into the All-trans-Retinoic Acid and Arsenic Trioxide Combination Treatment for Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: A Meta-Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 134 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongbing Ma ◽  
Jing Yang

Background: This study aimed to compare the curative effects of the combination therapy of all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO, As2O3) with ATRA monotherapy on newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Methods: The studies were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ChinaInfo and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases from the inception to June 20, 2014. Thereafter, the eligible studies were selected based on the predefined criteria, and the literature quality was assessed. The meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.2 software. The pooled effect size was relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: A total of 8 studies containing 480 cases were included, among which 264 were assigned to the ATRA + ATO group and the other 216 to the ATRA group. The meta-analysis showed that ATRA + ATO combination therapy significantly improved the complete remission (CR) rate (RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.03-1.16, p = 0.004), decreased the early mortality rate (RR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.20-0.9, p = 0.03) and relapse rate (RR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.07-0.42, p < 0.0001), but increased the high risk of liver dysfunction (RR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.72-3.41, p < 0.00001), comparing with ATRA monotherapy. Conclusions: The ATRA + ATO combination therapy may be more effective for newly diagnosed APL with a higher CR rate but lower early mortality rate and relapse rate. However, the risks of liver damage should be of concern.

Blood ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 1202-1206 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Kanamaru ◽  
Y Takemoto ◽  
M Tanimoto ◽  
H Murakami ◽  
N Asou ◽  
...  

We conducted a multicenter trial of treatment with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) for newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) in the AML-92 study and compared it with our previous study with standard intensive chemotherapy, the AML-89 study, in the view of complete remission (CR) rate, incidence of early death, and event-free survival (EFS). Patients were scheduled to receive oral ATRA 45 mg/m2 daily until CR. If patients had leukocyte counts above 3 x 10(9)/L at the start of therapy, they received daunorubicine (DNR) 40 mg/m2 for 3 days and behenoyl cytosine arabinoside (BHAC) 200 mg/m2 for 5 days in addition to ATRA. During the ATRA therapy, if patients showed myeloblast plus promyelocyte counts higher than 1 x 10(9)/L in the peripheral blood, they received additional DNR and BHAC in the same schedule, as well. A total of 110 patients were entered into the study. Median age was 43 years (range, 16 to 74). Twenty-eight (26%) of 109 patients (one died before the start of therapy) received ATRA alone. Ninety-seven patients (89%) achieved CR; 48 of 49 (98%) aged less than 40 years, 44 of 52 (84%) aged between 40 and 69, and 5 of 8 (63%) aged above 70 achieved CR, respectively; 25 of 28 (89%) with ATRA alone, 46 of 51 (90%) with ATRA plus initial chemotherapy and 26 of 30 (87%) with ATRA plus later chemotherapy attained CR, respectively. Nine (8%) patients died within 28 days after the start of therapy. In contrast, 44 of 62 patients (71%) attained CR, and 13 (21%) died within 28 days in the AML-89 study with the combination of DNR, BHAC, 6-mercaptopurine and prednisolone. Seven developed retinoic acid syndrome and one died of it in the present study. Other toxicities associated with this drug included cheilitis, desquamation, muscle pain, and hypertriglyceridemia. Predicted 23 months EFS for all ATRA-treated patients and disease-free survival (DFS) in the CR cases were 75% and 81%, respectively, in a median follow-up period of 21 months. Compared to the AML-89 study, there was a highly significant difference in remission rate (P = .004), EFS (P = .0007), and also early mortality rate (P = .02). Present results demonstrated that ATRA with or without chemotherapy gives a statistical improvement in CR rate and early mortality rate, as well as superior survival in newly diagnosed APL.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-387
Author(s):  
Rohan Bhise ◽  
Imtiaz Ahmed ◽  
Sapna Imtiaz

Introduction: Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a distinct leukemia which can be treated with differentiating agents alone.Treatment without chemotherapy decreases the cost of treatment and the need for supportive care. Here we present analysis of APL patients treated with arsenic trioxide (ATO)-all trans retinoic acid (ATRA) without chemotherapy in our hospital.Patients and Methods: Forty three patients with newly diagnosed APL were treated with arsenic trioxide(ATO ) and All trans retinoic acid (ATRA) during induction treatment. For consolidation ATRA 45 mg /m2 for two weeks every four weeks was administered for twenty eight weeks. ATO was administered for four cycles, with a cycle length of eight weeks. The drug was administered at 0.15 mg/kg/d for five days per week for four weeks during each cycle.Patients were followed up with once in three month hemogram and once in six month reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for two years and yearly thereafter. Results: The morphologic complete remission (CR) rate was 86.04%.The most common cause of remission failure was early death due to bleeding. None of the low risk patients died during induction therapy. The most important prognostic factor for early mortality was a high white blood cell (WBC) count at presentation. The median overall survival (OS) has not been reached.The two year OS was 83.4% and the three year OS was 74.8%.The estimated five year survival was 74.8%. At a median follow up of 42.6 months the estimated five year survival in the low-intermediate risk group was 93.3% and 59.1% in the high risk group Conclusion: ATO –ATRA can be considered as a treatment option for frontline treatment of all risk APL patients in resource poor settings.The results can be better with better supportive care to prevent early mortality and by salvaging patients who relapse.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1677-1677
Author(s):  
Jean Lachaine ◽  
Karine Mathurin ◽  
Stephane Barakat

Abstract Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a distinct and rare morphological, clinical and pathological subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). It represents approximately 10% to 15% of AML patients. APL is characterized by a high incidence of coagulopathy caused by disseminated intravascular coagulation and/or excessive fibrinolysis and is associated with a high early mortality. Treatment can exacerbate the coagulopathy. Untreated, APL is rapidly fatal, but if promptly diagnosed and treated, it is frequently curable. Although current treatments (all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), anthracyclines and conventional chemotherapy) are associated with high remission rates, cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy remain a concern in the management of newly diagnosed APL. Trisenox® is a sterile injectable solution of arsenic trioxide (ATO). Trisenox® has been approved in several countries, including Canada, for the induction of remission and consolidation in patients with APL who are refractory to, or have relapsed from, retinoid and anthracycline chemotherapy. Since the first approval of ATO is for the indication of relapsed/refractory APL, the safety and efficacy of ATO during induction and consolidation of newly diagnosed APL patients have been demonstrated. Specifically, Lo-Coco et al. compared the combination of ATO+ATRA to ATRA + idarubicin (IDA) and confirmed that the combination of ATO+ATRA is at least as effective as standard treatment in the first-line setting. The objective of this study was to assess, from a Canadian perspective, the economic impact of the combination of ATO+ATRA in the treatment of newly diagnosed APL. A time-dependent Markov model was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness of ATO+ATRA compared to ATRA+IDA in the treatment of newly diagnosed APL. The Markov model comprises four health states: event-free survival (EFS), treatment failure/relapse (TF), post-failure (PF) and death. The length of each Markov cycle was one month for the 48-month period of the Lo-Coco et al. study and then of one year. The model continued to run until all patients reached the absorbing state, defined as death. All patients started in the EFS state and could then move to other health states. In the case of treatment relapse/failure, patients were subsequently treated with a salvage induction therapy composed of ATRA and conventional chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as consolidation treatment. The model also takes into account the incidence of treatment-induced adverse events that were significantly different between both treatment arms in the Lo-Coco et al. study(neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fever episodes, and QTc interval prolongation). The model also allows comparison with the combination of ATRA+IDA+cytarabine, which is also used in Canada. Analyses were conducted from both a Canadian Ministry of Health (MoH) and a societal perspective over a lifetime horizon. In the treatment of newly diagnosed APL, ATRA+ATO is associated with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of $50,193 per QALY and $46,367 per QALY, from a MoH and societal perspective respectively when compared with ATRA+IDA. According to the deterministic analysis Results, the ICER of ATO+ATRA compared to ATRA+IDA varied from $23,045 / QALY and $60,759 / QALY from a MoH perspective and between $21,294 / QALY and $56,933 / QALY from a societal perspective. Results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that the ICER remains below $50,000 in 48.33% and 74.21% of the Monte Carlo simulations from a MoH and a societal perspective respectively. However, ICER remains below $100,000 in 100% of the simulations from both perspectives. The use of Trisenox in the first line therapy of patients with APL provides significant additional clinical benefits and is associated with an ICUR below the ICUR of many other oncology treatments currently in use. Disclosures: Lachaine: Lundbeck Canada: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Arsenic trioxide is not yet approved in Canada for the First-line treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Barakat:Lundbeck Canada: Employment.


Cancer ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (7) ◽  
pp. 1355-1359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Aribi ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Elihu H. Estey ◽  
Charles A. Koller ◽  
Deborah A. Thomas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document