Oxygen Uptake: Work Rate Relationship in Patients with Heart Disease1

Author(s):  
Haruki Itoh
2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine E. Robben ◽  
David C. Poole ◽  
Craig A. Harms

A two-test protocol (incremental/ramp (IWT) + supramaximal constant-load (CWR)) to affirm max and obviate reliance on secondary criteria has only been validated in highly fit children. In girls (n = 15) and boys (n = 12) with a wide range of VO2max (17–47 ml/kg/min), we hypothesized that this procedure would evince a VO2-WR plateau and unambiguous VO2max even in the presence of expiratory flow limitation (EFL). A plateau in the VO2-work rate relationship occurred in 75% of subjects irrespective of EFL There was a range in RER at max exercise for girls (0.97–1.14; mean 1.06 ± 0.04) and boys (0.98−1.09; mean 1.03 ± 0.03) such that 3/15 girls and 2/12 boys did not achieve the criterion RER. Moreover, in girls with RER > 1.0 it would have been possible to achieve this criterion at 78% VO2max. Boys achieved 92% VO2max at RER = 1.0. This was true also for HRmax where 8/15 girls’ and 6/12 boys’ VO2max would have been rejected based on HRmax being < 90% of age-predicted HRmax. In those who achieved the HRmax criterion, it represented a VO2 of 86% (girls) and 87% (boys) VO2max. We conclude that this two-test protocol confirms VO2max in children across a threefold range of VO2max irrespective of EFL and circumvents reliance on secondary criteria.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Niemeyer ◽  
Raphael Knaier ◽  
Ralph Beneke

AbstractA flattening of the oxygen uptake–work rate relationship at severe exercise indicates the achievement of maximum oxygen uptake $$\left({\text{VO}}_{2\max } \right)$$ VO 2 max . Unfortunately, a distinct plateau $$\left( {{{\text{VO}}}_{2} {\text{pl}}} \right)$$ VO 2 pl at $${{\text{VO}}}_{2\max }$$ VO 2 max is not found in all participants. The aim of this investigation was to critically review the influence of research methods and physiological factors on the $${{\text{VO}}}_{2} {\text{pl}}$$ VO 2 pl incidence. It is shown that many studies used inappropriate definitions or methodical approaches to check for the occurrence of a $${{\text{VO}}}_{2} {\text{pl}}$$ VO 2 pl . In contrast to the widespread assumptions it is unclear whether there is higher $${{\text{VO}}}_{2} {\text{pl}}$$ VO 2 pl incidence in (uphill) running compared to cycling exercise or in discontinuous compared to continuous incremental exercise tests. Furthermore, most studies that evaluated the validity of supramaximal verification phases, reported verification bout durations, which are too short to ensure that $${{\text{VO}}}_{2\max }$$ VO 2 max have been achieved by all participants. As a result, there is little evidence for a higher $${{\text{VO}}}_{2} {\text{pl}}$$ VO 2 pl incidence and a corresponding advantage for the diagnoses of $${{\text{VO}}}_{2\max }$$ VO 2 max when incremental tests are supplemented by supramaximal verification bouts. Preliminary evidence suggests that the occurrence of a $${{\text{VO}}}_{2} {\text{pl}}$$ VO 2 pl in continuous incremental tests is determined by physiological factors like anaerobic capacity, $${{\text{VO}}}_{2}$$ VO 2 -kinetics and accumulation of metabolites in the submaximal intensity domain. Subsequent studies should take more attention to the use of valid $${{\text{VO}}}_{2} {\text{pl}}$$ VO 2 pl definitions, which require a cut-off at ~ 50% of the submaximal $${{\text{VO}}}_{2}$$ VO 2 increase and rather large sampling intervals. Furthermore, if verification bouts are used to verify the achievement of $${{\text{VO}}}_{{2{\text{peak}}}}$$ VO 2 peak /$${{\text{VO}}}_{2\max }$$ VO 2 max , it should be ensured that they can be sustained for sufficient durations.


2002 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Akira Koike ◽  
Haruki Itoh ◽  
Makoto Kato ◽  
Tadanori Aizawa ◽  
Hiroyuki Iinuma ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 504-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
HARUKI ITOH ◽  
MASATO NAKAMURA ◽  
CHIEKO IKEDA ◽  
ETSUKO YANAGISAWA ◽  
FUMIHIKO HATOGAI ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Riley ◽  
K. Maehara ◽  
J. P�rsz�sz ◽  
M. P. K. J. Engelen ◽  
H. Tanaka ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 115 (12) ◽  
pp. 2583-2592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eloisa Limonta ◽  
Susanna Rampichini ◽  
Andrea Riboli ◽  
Massimo Venturelli ◽  
Emiliano Cè ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document