The CT-Simulation 3-D Treatment Planning Process

Author(s):  
Jeff M. Michalski ◽  
James A. Purdy ◽  
William Harms ◽  
John W. Matthews
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 84-84
Author(s):  
Arpine Khudanyan ◽  
Jerry Jeff Jaboin ◽  
Barb Agrimson ◽  
Simon Brown ◽  
Wolfram Laub ◽  
...  

84 Background: The treatment planning process is the most impactful and complex aspect of radiation oncology care. In order to provide short turn around times from patient CT simulation to treatment plan QA, requires a level of strain and haste for multiple members of the treatment team. We evaluated 18 months of data to determine the percentage of Quality Assurance (QA) approvals of nonemergent complex plans (including 3D/IMRT/Arc/SBRT/SRS) that are not completed by 8:00a the day prior to a patient's first treatment appointment, and found that this occcurred on time 62% of the time. We utilized the ASCO Quality Training Process (QTP) process to brainstorm methods to enhance workflow, and create an action plan that would allow for small Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to reach our ideal state of > 90% On Time Treatment Plan Delivery. Methods: We utilized LEAN tools from the ASCO QTP progam (June 2016 cycle). We created an Ishikawa diagram to determine the areas of greatest potential. We subsequently developed a highly detailed flow chart of our work processes. Then we utilized Mosaiq scripts to establish baselines for our process measures. Results: From our Ishikawa diagram, the initial most impact was in generate target volume contours after the CT simulation. Our first measure was to visually manage the CT simulation process. We established a computer based quality control list (QCL) to enhance the communication process, and provided a "reminder" at the time of simulation of the target contour delivery date. After collection of data points, there was a significant improvement in on time delivery (now 89%, and approaching the ideal state), as illustrated by our Run Chart, and a coincident decrease in variability between providers and cases was noted in this cohort. Conclusions: Our preliminary change effort is promising, but further data will enhance our findings. Our next steps are to collect an additional two weeks of data, and initiate another PDSA cycle with a new measure of automated reminders from the QCL system. In achieving our project goals and making it sustainable, we believe that we will be providing high quality, high value patient care, while enhancing the healthiness of the work environment for our staff.


Author(s):  
Viyan S. Kadhium ◽  
Katherine Shin ◽  
Vidya Ramaswamy ◽  
Romesh P. Nalliah

2011 ◽  
Vol 84 (1006) ◽  
pp. 919-929 ◽  
Author(s):  
G G Hanna ◽  
J R Van Sörnsen De Koste ◽  
K J Carson ◽  
J M O'Sullivan ◽  
A R Hounsell ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stasa Jelercic ◽  
Mirjana Rajer

AbstractBackground. PET-CT is becoming more and more important in various aspects of oncology. Until recently it was used mainly as part of diagnostic procedures and for evaluation of treatment results. With development of personalized radiotherapy, volumetric and radiobiological characteristics of individual tumour have become integrated in the multistep radiotherapy (RT) planning process. Standard anatomical imaging used to select and delineate RT target volumes can be enriched by the information on tumour biology gained by PET-CT. In this review we explore the current and possible future role of PET-CT in radiotherapy treatment planning. After general explanation, we assess its role in radiotherapy of those solid tumours for which PET-CT is being used most.Conclusions. In the nearby future PET-CT will be an integral part of the most radiotherapy treatment planning procedures in an every-day clinical practice. Apart from a clear role in radiation planning of lung cancer, with forthcoming clinical trials, we will get more evidence of the optimal use of PET-CT in radiotherapy planning of other solid tumours


2021 ◽  
pp. 20210214
Author(s):  
Hanlin Wang ◽  
Ruoxi Wang ◽  
Jiacheng Liu ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Kaining Yao ◽  
...  

Objectives: To develop and evaluate a practical automatic treatment planning method for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in cervical cancer cases. Methods: A novel algorithm named as Optimization Objectives Tree Search Algorithm (OOTSA) was proposed to emulate the planning optimization process and achieve a progressively improving IMRT plan, based on the Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface (ESAPI). Thirty previously treated cervical cancer cases were selected from the clinical database and comparison was made between the OOTSA-generated plans and clinical treated plans and RapidPlan-based (RP) plans. Results: In clinical evaluation, compared with plan scores of the clinical plans and the RP plans, 22 and 26 of the OOTSA plans were considered as clinically improved in terms of plan quality, respectively. The average conformity index (CI) for the PTV in the OOTSA plans was 0.86 ± 0.01 (mean ± 1 standard deviation), better than those in the RP plans (0.83 ± 0.02) and the clinical plans (0.71 ± 0.11). Compared with the clinical plans, the mean doses of femoral head, rectum, spinal cord and right kidney in the OOTSA plans were reduced by 2.34 ± 2.87 Gy, 1.67 ± 2.10 Gy, 4.12 ± 6.44 Gy and 1.15 ± 2.67 Gy. Compared with the RP plans, the mean doses of femoral head, spinal cord, right kidney and small intestine in the OOTSA plans were reduced by 3.31 ± 1.55 Gy, 4.25 ± 3.69 Gy, 1.54 ± 2.23 Gy and 3.33 ± 1.91 Gy, respectively. In the OOTSA plans, the mean dose of bladder was slightly increased, with 2.33 ± 2.55 Gy (versus clinical plans) and 1.37 ± 1.74 Gy (versus RP plans). The average elapsed time of OOTSA and clinical planning were 59.2 ± 3.47 min and 76.53 ± 5.19 min. Conclusions: The plans created by OOTSA have been shown marginally better than the manual plans, especially in preserving OARs. In addition, the time of automatic treatment planning has shown a reduction compared to a manual planning process, and the variation of plan quality was greatly reduced. Although improvement on the algorithm is warranted, this proof-of-concept study has demonstrated that the proposed approach can be a practical solution for automatic planning. Advances in knowledge: The proposed method is novel in the emulation strategy of the physicists’ iterative operation during the planning process. Based on the existing optimizers, this method can be a simple yet effective solution for automated IMRT treatment planning.


2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (6Part23) ◽  
pp. 2294-2294 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Clark ◽  
I El Naqa ◽  
A Hope ◽  
G Suneja ◽  
J Bradley ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document