scholarly journals Clopidogrel plus Aspirin for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Pilot Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 157-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tareq Kass-Hout ◽  
Melanie Winningham ◽  
Omar Kass-Hout ◽  
Laura Henriquez ◽  
Frank Tong ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: There are limited data on the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary stroke prevention in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Methods: Consecutive patients presenting with high-grade (70-99%) symptomatic intracranial stenosis from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013, and evaluated within 30 days of the index event were eligible for this analysis. All patients underwent treatment with aspirin plus clopidogrel for a target duration of 12 months along with aggressive medical management based on the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) protocol; all patients were given gastrointestinal prophylaxis for the duration of their aspirin and clopidogrel treatment. Clinical and safety outcomes of our cohort were compared with the medical arm of the SAMMPRIS trial cohort (n = 227). Results: Our cohort included 25 patients that met the inclusion criteria. Achievement of blood pressure and LDL cholesterol targets were similar between our cohort and the SAMMPRIS cohort. At 1 year, the rates of stroke, myocardial infarction or vascular death were 0% in our cohort and 16% in the SAMMPRIS cohort (p = 0.03). At 1 year, major bleeding rates were similar between our cohort and the SAMMPRIS cohort (4 vs. 2.2%, p = 1.0). Conclusion: A prolonged course of dual antiplatelet therapy for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease may be associated with less vascular events with no increase in hemorrhagic complications.

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajbeer S Sangha ◽  
Carlos Corado ◽  
Richard A Bernstein ◽  
Ilana Ruff ◽  
Yvonne Curran ◽  
...  

Background: Since the SAMMPRIS trial, aggressive medical management (AMM) with the use of dual antiplatelets (aspirin, clopidogrel) and high dose statin therapy has been standard of care for patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). However, there is limited data on the “real-world” application of this regimen. We hypothesized that 30-day recurrent stroke risk among patients treated with AMM would be similar to that in SAMMPRIS medically-treated patients. Methods: Using the prospective Northwestern University Brain Attack Registry, we identified all patients admitted between 8/1/12 and 1/31/14 with 1) confirmed ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA); 2) independently adjudicated symptomatic ICAD; and 3) discharged on AMM. At 30 days (28-35 day window) post-stroke, patients or proxies were contacted by telephone to review events and outcomes. We also utilized an electronic surveillance system of hospital records at any of 3 health system hospitals with confirmation by manual review of the medical record in all instances of reported recurrent stroke or TIA. Ischemic stroke in the territory of the symptomatic stenotic artery was the primary outcome. We calculated 30-day rate of stroke in the territory of the stenotic artery and 95% confidence intervals using the Wald method and compared it with that reported in the SAMMPRIS trial. Results: Among 36 patients who met study criteria, 13 (36.1%) were female and mean age was 65.4 (± 9.7) years. Median initial NIHSS score was 4 (interquartile range 0-17). Symptomatic ICAD was localized to the anterior circulation in 21 (58%) patients and posterior circulation in 15 (41.7%). At 30 days, 3 of the 36 patients (8.3%, 95% CI 2.1-22.6%) had recurrent stroke compared to 5.8% in the medical arm of SAMMPRIS (p=0.47). An additional 3 patients (8.3%) experienced TIA within 30 days. Conclusions: In a single-center observational cohort study, we found that AMM in patients with symptomatic ICAD yielded similar rates of recurrent stroke at 30-days as observed in the SAMMPRIS trial. Our study provides “real-world” confirmation of the potential benefits of AMM in this high-risk stroke subtype.


Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. 2806-2809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc I. Chimowitz ◽  
David Fiorella ◽  
Colin P. Derdeyn ◽  
Tanya N. Turan ◽  
Bethany F. Lane ◽  
...  

Neurology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 90 (6) ◽  
pp. e447-e454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiejie Li ◽  
Anxin Wang ◽  
Xingquan Zhao ◽  
Liping Liu ◽  
Xia Meng ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo determine the relationship of high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with and without intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) in the Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE) trial.MethodsA subgroup of 807 patients with both magnetic resonance angiography images and hsCRP measurement was analyzed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the interaction of hsCRP levels with the effects of dual and single antiplatelet therapy.ResultsA total of 358 (44.4%) patients had ICAS and 449 (55.6%) did not. The proportion of patients with elevated hsCRP levels was higher in the ICAS group than in the non-ICAS group (40.2% vs 30.1%, p = 0.003). There was significant interaction between hsCRP and the 2 antiplatelet therapy groups in their effects on recurrent stroke after adjustment for confounding factors in the patients with ICAS (p = 0.012), but not in those without (p = 0.256). Compared with aspirin alone, clopidogrel plus aspirin significantly reduced the risk of recurrent stroke only in the patients with ICAS and nonelevated hsCRP levels (adjusted hazard ratio 0.27; 95% confidence interval 0.11 to 0.69; p = 0.006). Similar results were observed for composite vascular events. No significant difference in bleeding was found.ConclusionsPresence of both ICAS and nonelevated hsCRP levels may predict better response to dual antiplatelet therapy in reducing new stroke and composite vascular events in minor stroke or high-risk TIA patients. Further large-scale randomized and controlled clinical trials are needed to confirm this finding.


Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya N Turan ◽  
Azhar Nizam ◽  
Michael J Lynn ◽  
Jean Montgomery ◽  
Colin P Derdeyn ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: Symptomatic intracranial stenosis patients with poorly controlled cholesterol and blood pressure had an increased risk of vascular events in WASID. Therefore, SAMMPRIS aggressive medical management protocols targeted these risk factors. We sought to determine if intensive risk factor control in SAMMPRIS resulted in lower risk of vascular events during follow-up. Methods: Data on 227 SAMMPRIS patients randomized to aggressive medical management alone were used for these analyses. Vascular risk factors were recorded at baseline, 30 days, and every 4 months. Additional follow-up and close-out visit data were also included. For each patient, values for all risk factor measures (from baseline until the time of an event) were averaged and dichotomized based on the risk factor target. Time to event curves for a vascular event (stroke, MI, and vascular death) were compared between subjects with and without risk factor control using the log-rank test and hazard ratios were calculated with Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: The univariate analyses are shown in the table. Subjects with mean follow-up SBP < 140 mm Hg (< 130 for diabetics), LDL < 70 mg/dL, and at least moderate exercise had lower risk of vascular events compared to those who did not achieve those targets. Control of other risk factors (HgA1c, smoking, non-HDL, and Body Mass Index) did not have a significant impact on outcome. Conclusions: Well controlled SBP and LDL during follow-up were predictors of lower vascular events in SAMMPRIS, confirming that SBP and LDL should be aggressively treated in patients with intracranial stenosis to prevent future vascular events. Exercise participation was also associated with fewer vascular events and should be strongly encouraged.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rimal H Dossani ◽  
Muhammad Waqas ◽  
Justin M Cappuzzo ◽  
Ashish Sonig ◽  
Adnan H Siddiqui ◽  
...  

Abstract Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is a common cause of stroke. Antiplatelet therapy is the mainstay for symptomatic ICAD treatment. Endovascular management with submaximal angioplasty and/or intracranial stenting is reserved for patients with repeated ischemic events despite optimal medical therapy. We demonstrate intracranial angioplasty and stenting technique, technique indications, and sizing of stent and target vessel diameter. Stenting and angioplasty have been described in the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis and Wingspan Stent System Post Market Surveillance trials.1,2 Submaximal angioplasty has also been described.3 This patient, who had been on dual antiplatelet therapy for several months, initially presented with occlusion of the left middle cerebral artery M2 inferior division and underwent mechanical thrombectomy with successful reperfusion. Postoperatively, the patient's symptoms did not improve. Medical management was optimized with heparin infusion. However, repeat stroke study demonstrated M2 inferior division reocclusion. A decision was made to proceed with intracranial angioplasty and stenting. P2Y12 levels were therapeutic. Under moderate conscious sedation, submaximal angioplasty of up to 80% of the normal M2 caliber was attempted. However, we observed persistent high-grade stenosis of the M2 inferior division. The major risk of crossing the lesion for angioplasty is vessel perforation. To safely perform this maneuver, we used a J-configured Synchro-2 microwire (Stryker). Because of the patient's recent thrombectomy, we also had prior tactile feedback about how much resistance was encountered while crossing the occlusion. We then deployed a balloon-mounted intracranial stent for optimal radial force across the stenotic area to restore perfusion. Postoperative computed tomography perfusion showed resolution of the previously noticed perfusion deficit. The patient gave informed consent for the procedures and video recording. Institutional review board approval was deemed unnecessary. Video. ©University at Buffalo Neurosurgery, September 2020. With permission.


Author(s):  
Shinichiro Uchiyama ◽  
Kazunori Toyoda ◽  
Katsuhiro Omae ◽  
Ryotaro Saita ◽  
Kazumi Kimura ◽  
...  

Background Long‐term benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) over single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) for the prevention of recurrent stroke has not been established in patients with intracranial arterial stenosis. We compared the efficacy and safety of DAPT with cilostazol and clopidogrel or aspirin to those of SAPT with clopidogrel or aspirin in patients with intracranial arterial stenosis, who were recruited to the Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study for Antiplatelet Combination trial, a randomized controlled trial in high‐risk Japanese patients with ischemic stroke. Methods and Results We compared the vascular and hemorrhagic events between DAPT and SAPT in patients with ischemic stroke and symptomatic or asymptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis of at least 50% in a major intracranial artery. Patients were placed in two groups: 275 were assigned to receive DAPT and 272 patients SAPT. The risks of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23–0.95); and composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26–0.91) were lower in DAPT than SAPT, whereas the risk of severe or life‐threatening bleeding (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.12–4.30) did not differ between the 2 treatment groups. Conclusions DAPT using cilostazol was superior to SAPT with clopidogrel or aspirin for the prevention of recurrent stroke and vascular events without increasing bleeding risk among patients with intracranial arterial stenosis after stroke. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01995370.


2016 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 964-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Travis M. Dumont ◽  
Ashish Sonig ◽  
Maxim Mokin ◽  
Jorge L. Eller ◽  
Grant C. Sorkin ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) accounts for approximately 10% of ischemic strokes. The recent Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) study demonstrated a high incidence of perioperative complications (15%) for treatment of ICAD with stenting. Although the incidence of stroke was lower in the medical arm, recurrent stroke was found in 12% of patients despite aggressive medical management, suggesting that intervention may remain a viable option for ICAD if perioperative risk is minimized. Angioplasty without stenting represents an alternative and understudied revascularization treatment for ICAD. Submaximal angioplasty limits the risks of thromboembolism, vessel perforation, and reperfusion hemorrhage that were frequently reported with stenting in the SAMMPRIS trial. The authors conducted a prospective Phase I trial designed to assess the safety of submaximal angioplasty in patients with symptomatic ICAD. METHODS This study was approved by the local institutional review board. Demographic and clinical data were prospectively collected. Angioplasty was performed with a balloon undersized to approximately 50%–70% of the nondiseased vessel diameter in patients with symptomatic ICAD who had angiographically significant stenosis of ≥ 70%. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of periprocedural complications (combined rate of death, stroke, and hemorrhage occurring within 30 days and at 1 year). RESULTS Among the 65 patients with symptomatic ICAD who were screened, 24 had significant angiographic stenosis that met the inclusion criteria of this study. The mean age was 64.08 years (median 65 years; SD ± 11.24 years), most were men (62.5%), and most were white (66.67%). Many patients had concomitants of vascular disease, including hypertension (95.8%), hyperlipidemia (70.83%), smoking history (54.1%), and diabetes mellitus (50.0%). Coronary artery disease (41.66%) and previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (45.83%) were frequently present. Most patients (75%) had anterior circulation stenosis. The mean preprocedure stenosis was 80.16% (median 80%, range 70%–95%). Submaximal angioplasty was performed in patients who met the inclusion criteria, with a mean postangioplasty stenosis rate of 54.62% (median 55.5%, range 31%–78%). Rates of ischemic stroke in the territory of the treated artery were 0% within 30 days and 5.55% (in the only patient who presented with recurrent stroke) at 1 year. The mortality and hemorrhage rates in this series were 0%. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the safety of the submaximal angioplasty technique, with no permanent periprocedural complications in 24 treated patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document