Restoring the Carious Lesion

Author(s):  
Gerd Göstemeyer ◽  
Falk Schwendicke ◽  
Uwe Blunck
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bushra Habeeb Al-Maula ◽  
Suhad Jabbar Al-Nasrawi ◽  
Alaa Dakhil Yassir ◽  
Abtesam Imhemed Aljdaimi ◽  
Ruba Mansour Mustafa ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 503-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.M. Theuns ◽  
J.W.E. van Dijk ◽  
F.C.M. Driessens ◽  
A. Groeneveld

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Farhin Katge ◽  
Sajjad Mithiborwala ◽  
Thejokrishna Pammi

Dentists often find foreign bodies in the primary dentition of children who habitually place objects in their mouths. The objects are frequently embedded in exposures that result from carious or traumatic lesions or from endodontic procedures that have been left open for drainage. Such bodies are often detected on routine radiographs and, less frequently, during clinical examination. We report a case of a 6-year-old boy who had inadvertently embedded a screw in his mandibular right first primary molar and had forgotten about it until it became symptomatic. The screw was impacted in the exposed pulp chamber due to a large carious lesion in the affected molar. This case report considers the possible medical and dental consequences of placing foreign bodies in the mouth.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 553-560
Author(s):  
Marwa M. Abd el-monem ◽  
Maha A. Niazy ◽  
Mohamed A. El-Yassaky

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 774-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Doméjean ◽  
Julie Rongier ◽  
Michèle Muller-Bolla

ABSTRACT Aim The aim of this systematic review was to assess the in vivo scientific evidence regarding the ability of a recently developed light fluorescence device, SoproLife® (Sopro-Acteon group, La Ciotat, France) in detecting occlusal carious lesions. The PubMed database was searched for in vivo trials that evaluated the validity of the SoproLife® camera for the detection of occlusal carious lesions. Among the 11 articles originally identified with the keyword “Soprolife,” only three articles were included. The three included surveys used the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS)-II criteria as gold standard for the assessment of SoproLife® compared or not to other detection devices (DIAGNOdent® and Spectra Caries Detection Aid®). Two of the included studies reported only on permanent teeth or both primary and permanent teeth. The SoproLife® validity values varied markedly among studies with a sensitivity ranging between 0.43 and 0.95 and a specificity between 0.55 and 1. Interobserver reproducibility with the SoproLife® was reported in two of the three studies (0.98 and 0.72) and none of the studies reported about intraobserver reproducibility. No clear-cut conclusion can be made based on the three included clinical studies; further in vivo investigations are needed to confirm the validity of the SoproLife® camera in terms of detection of occlusal carious lesions. How to cite this article Doméjean S, Rongier J, Muller-Bolla M. Detection of Occlusal Carious Lesion using the SoproLife® Camera: A Systematic Review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(9):774-779.


2005 ◽  
Vol 136 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-22
Author(s):  
Kevin Gureckis ◽  
J.D. Overton
Keyword(s):  
Class I ◽  

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37
Author(s):  
Fahd AA Karima ◽  
Asma Sultana ◽  
Tazdik G Chowdhury ◽  
Md Samsul Alam ◽  
Mohammed Wahiduzzaman

This case report describes the Indirect Pulp Treatment (IPT) of deep carious lesion in a permanent molar with Ledemix. A 18 years old male patient reported discomfort associated with thermal stimulation on the mandibular right first permanent molar. Radiographically revealed a deep buccal carious lesion, very close to the pulp. periapical radiolucency and periodontal space thickening was absent. Pulp sensitivity was confirmed by thermal pulp vitality tests. Based on the main complaint and the clinical and radiographic examinations, the treatment plan was established to preserve pulp vitality. Clinical procedures consisted of removing the infected dentin and lining the caries-affected dentin with ledermix cement, the tooth was restored with composite cement. After 12 month follow-up, no clinical or radiographic pathological findings were found. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/updcj.v4i1.21164 Update Dent. Coll. j: 2014; 4 (1): 31-37


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document