Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma with Tumor Thrombus

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Gaetano Ciancio ◽  
Javier González

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of the study was to describe our experience in patients who underwent nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) with tumor thrombectomy. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> Three consecutive patients who underwent NSS and tumor thrombectomy for localized single/multifocal renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) in conjunction with tumor thrombus between 2007 and 2011 were included. Open partial nephrectomy and thrombectomy was performed. Reconstruction included main renal vein, collecting system, and remaining parenchymal closure. One of the cases required additional artery repair and flushing with preservation solution. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Ischemic time was kept for 30–40 min. Mean estimated blood loss was 183.3 cc (range:100–300). One patient required the transfusion of 1 packed red blood cells unit. One of the patients developed a urinary fistula requiring double-J stenting. Hospital staying ranged between 5 and 8 days. None of the patients required renal replacement therapy either postoperatively or in the follow-up. Serum creatinine level at last follow-up (mean 83 months) ranged from 0.8 to 2.8 mg/dL. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our experience supports the feasibility of imperative partial nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy for cases of RCC with renal vein involvement by tumor thrombus. In experienced hands, this approach may offer the patient a low morbidity postoperative course and long-term freedom from disease while maintaining the renal function, thus avoiding the need of renal replacement therapy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 387-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Jilg ◽  
Hartmut P. H. Neumann ◽  
S. Gläsker ◽  
O. Schäfer ◽  
C. Leiber ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quanlin Li ◽  
Hongwei Guan ◽  
Jie Qin ◽  
Tao Jiang

Objectives. To explore the safety and efficacy of mini-margin nephron sparing surgery (NSS) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) 4 cm or less.Methods. Total of 389 cases of RCC 4 cm or less with normal contralateral kidneys were included in the study, including 135 cases treated by mini-margin NSS, 98 by 1 cm-NSS and 156 by radical nephrectomy (RN). The clinical results were followed-up and comparatively analyzed.Results. The mean and median margin width for mm-NSS was 2.2 and 2.0 mm (range 0 to 5). Of them, 112 (83.0%) cases had margins of 3 mm or less, and 26 had margins of 0 mm (19.3%). The mean width of margin for 1 cm-NSS was 11.6 mm (median 12, range 10~15). None of the NSS patients had positive surgical margins. The mean follow-up for mm-NSS, 1 cm-NSS and RN patients was 69, 82 and 82 months, respectively. Three mm-NSS patients, two 1 cm- NSS and four RN patients died of non-cancer related causes. Two mm-NSS patient (1.6%) experienced local recurrence. No distant metastasis was detected in all the patients. The over all 5-year survivals for NSS and RN patients were 100%, 100% and 98.7%, respectively (P=.950).Conclusions. Mini-margin NSS is as safe and effective as 1 cm-NSS and RN in treating early localized RCC 4 cm or less.


2010 ◽  
Vol 106 (10) ◽  
pp. 1494-1498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surendra B. Kolla ◽  
Cesar Ercole ◽  
Philippe E. Spiess ◽  
Julio M. Pow-Sang ◽  
Wade J. Sexton

Urology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 639-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solomon L. Woldu ◽  
LaMont J. Barlow ◽  
Trushar Patel ◽  
Greg W. Hruby ◽  
Mitchell C. Benson ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 676-676
Author(s):  
Stephen Ryan ◽  
Ahmet Bindayi ◽  
Aaron Bloch ◽  
Ryan Nasseri ◽  
Zachary Hamilton ◽  
...  

676 Background: AUA guidelines recommend consideration of nephron sparing surgery in patients with comorbidities that are likely to impact renal function, such as diabetes mellitus (DM). We compared the impact of partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) on overall survival (OS) in patients with pre-existing DM and Stage I Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). Methods: Multicenter retrospective analysis of surgically treated Stage I RCC from 2005-16 with or without DM. Primary outcome was OS analyzed by DM+ or DM- and surgical approach (PN or RN) for AJCC Stage I. Logistic (OR) and Cox (HR) regression were utilized for OS. Results: 2173 patients were analyzed (1223 RN, 1819 PN, 555 DM+, 2487 DM-) with mean follow-up of 49.1 months. Increasing Age (OR 1.028, p = .009), RN (OR 2.446, p = .001), and most recent eGFR < 45 (OR 2.306 p = .002) remained significant on multivariate analysis for OS (Table 1). In the PN subgroup, DM+ or DM- was not associated with decreased OS (HR 1.48 p = 0.19). DM+ was associated with decreased OS in the RN subgroup (HR 1.97 p = 0.005). Conclusions: In Stage I RCC, DM and RN negatively impacted OS, while only RN remained significant on MVA. Subgroup analysis of PN showed that OS was similar in DM- and DM+ patients, but diagnosis of DM had a profound impact on OS in the RN group. This supports the guideline statements and offers evidence that urologists should prioritize nephron sparing surgery in patients with DM and Stage I Renal Cell Carcinoma.[Table: see text]


2010 ◽  
Vol 106 (5) ◽  
pp. 645-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel A. Lopez-Costea ◽  
Lluís Fumadó ◽  
David Lorente ◽  
Luis Riera ◽  
Eladio Franco Miranda

2008 ◽  
Vol 179 (4S) ◽  
pp. 328-328
Author(s):  
Miguel A Lopez-Costea ◽  
Lluis Fumado ◽  
Francesc Vigues ◽  
David Lorente ◽  
Lluis Riera ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document