scholarly journals Efficacy of fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling for epiretinal membrane foveoschisis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reio Sekine ◽  
Jiro Kogo ◽  
Tatsuya Jujo ◽  
Keiji Sato ◽  
Ibuki Arizono ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Epiretinal Membrane ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Shape Preserving ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Full Thickness Macular Hole ◽  
Good Visual Outcome

Purpose: To investigate the outcomes of vitrectomy with fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling (FSIP) for epiretinal membrane foveoschisis based on new optical coherence tomography definitions. Methods: 27 eyes of 28 patients (67.2 ± 10.5 years old) who underwent vitrectomy with FSIP without gas tamponade for epiretinal membrane foveoschisis were included. All patients underwent follow-up examinations for at least 12 months. In the FSIP technique, the ILM is peeled off in a donut shape, preserving the foveal ILM. The logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and surgical complications were examined. Results: The BCVA at 12 months improved significantly from baseline (p < 0.001). Baseline ellipsoid zone defects were found in 3 eyes (10%), and all defective eyes had recovered at 12 months. CMT decreased significantly from baseline (p < 0.001). Acute macular edema, full-thickness macular hole, and recurrence of epiretinal membrane were not observed during follow-up. Conclusion: FSIP achieved good visual outcome and retinal morphological change. Moreover, FSIP might avoid acute macular edema in epiretinal membrane foveoschisis surgery.

scholarly journals Vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema and the relevance of external limiting membrane

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivastinovic Domagoj ◽  
Haas Anton ◽  
Weger Martin ◽  
Seidel Gerald ◽  
Mayer-Xanthaki Christoph ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Age Related Macular Degeneration ◽  
External Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Spectral Domain Oct ◽  
Age Related

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the relevance of external limiting membrane (ELM) on the visual and morphological results in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) that underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. Methods Medical records of patients with DME who underwent PPV at our unit between January 2017 and December 2019 were reviewed. We assessed preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) using spectral domain OCT (optical coherence tomography). Exclusion criteria were previous PPV; incomplete data; concomitant diseases including retinal vein occlusion, age-related macular degeneration, uveitis; and a follow-up of less than 12 months. The surgeries were performed using 23- or 27-gauge vitrectomy. The ELM was graded depending on its configuration (grade 0 = intact, grade 1 to 3: disruption of varying extent). Results Ninety-nine eyes were enrolled. The postoperative follow up averaged 23.7 months. The preoperative and final BCVA averaged 0.71 ± 0.28 and 0.52 ± 0.3 logMAR, respectively (p = 0.002). The CMT averaged 515.2 ± 209.1 μm preoperatively and 327 ± 66.1 μm postoperatively (p = 0.001). Eyes with intact ELM (n = 8) had a significantly better BCVA compared to those with ELM disruption (0.28 ± 0.14 vs. 0.7 ± 0.25 logMAR, p = 0.01). The final CMT was similar among the groups (intact ELM: 317 ± 54.6 μm; ELM disruption: 334 ± 75.2, p = 0.31). Conclusions PPV with ERM and ILM peeling is an effective treatment of DME. Eyes with intact ELM preoperatively had a significantly better final visual outcome. To maximize the benefit for patients with DME we recommend early PPV as long as ELM is intact.

scholarly journals Does internal limiting membrane peeling during epiretinal membrane surgery induce microscotomas on microperimetry? Study protocol for PEELING, a randomized controlled clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Ducloyer ◽  
Juliette Ivan ◽  
Alexandra Poinas ◽  
Olivier Lebreton ◽  
Alexandre Bonissent ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Epiretinal Membrane ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Age Related ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Background The epiretinal membrane (ERM) is a degenerative condition associated with age, which can cause loss of vision and/or metamorphopsia. The treatment of symptomatic ERM involves surgical removal including a vitrectomy followed by peeling of the ERM using a microforceps. As the internal limiting membrane (ILM) is adherent to the ERM, it is sometimes removed with it (spontaneous peeling). If ILM remains in place, it can be removed to reduce ERM recurrence. However, it is important to clarify the safety of ILM peeling while it increases surgical risks and cause histological disorganization of the retina that can lead to microscotomas maybe responsible for definitive visual discomfort.Methods PEELING is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind and multi-centered trial with two parallel arms. This study investigates the benefit/risk ratio of active ILM peeling among subjects undergoing ERM surgery without spontaneous ILM peeling. Randomization is done in the operating room after ERM removal if ILM remains in place. After randomization, the two groups “active peeling of the ILM” and “no peeling of the ILM” are compared during a total of three follow-up visits scheduled at M1, M6 and M12. Primary endpoint is the difference in microscotomas before surgery and 6 months after surgery. Patients with spontaneous peeling are not randomized and are included in the ancillary study with the same follow-up visits and the same examinations as the principal study. Relevant inclusion criteria involve subjects over 18 years living with idiopathic symptomatic ERM, including pseudophakic patients with transparent posterior capsule or open capsule or lensed patients with age-related cataracts. The calculated sample size corresponds to 53 randomized eyes (1eye/patient) per arm that means 106 randomized eyes (106 randomized patients) in total and a maximum of 222 included patients (116 spontaneous peeling).Discussion ILM peeling is often practiced in ERM surgery to reduce ERM recurrence. It does not impair post-operative visual acuity but it increases the surgical risks and causes anatomical damages. If active ILM peeling is significantly associated with more microscotomas, it may contraindicate the ILM peeling during primitive idiopathic ERM surgery.Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02146144. Registered May 22, 2014. Recruitment is still ongoing

scholarly journals Influences of Central Bouquet Alterations on the Visual Outcome in Eyes Receiving Epiretinal Membrane Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 926
Author(s):  
Max Philipp Brinkmann ◽  
Stephan Michels ◽  
Carolin Brinkmann ◽  
Mario Damiano Toro ◽  
Nicole Graf Johansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Epiretinal Membranes ◽  
Staging Systems ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Pars Plana

Background: Previous studies have shown that epiretinal membranes (ERMs) may be associated with abnormal outer retinal anatomy. However, long-term morphological and functional results of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with ERM and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in eyes with central bouquet (CB) alterations have not yet been investigated. Methods: In a retrospective, consecutive study all patients underwent best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) testing and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) before and after a mean of 20 months (range 3–70 months) postoperatively. CB abnormalities and ERMs were classified according to Govetto’s staging systems. Results: Of the 67 eyes, 22 (34%) showed CB abnormalities at baseline. The mean BCVA increased from 0.42 at baseline to 0.20 LogMAR at final follow-up (p < 0.001). Neither ERM stage (p = 0.06) nor CB stage (p = 0.939) at baseline were significant predictors of vision improvement following surgery. Conclusions: Our results show that baseline BCVA, but not classification of CB changes and ERM at baseline, seems to be a useful predictor for functional outcomes following PPV with ERM and ILM peeling in the long-term.

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcome of Vitrectomy with Suitable Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Air Tamponade for Highly Myopic Foveoschisis-Associated Lamellar Macular Hole

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Jia-lin Wang ◽  
Yan-ling Wang
Keyword(s):  
Macular Hole ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Lamellar Macular Hole ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Membrane Peeling ◽  
Myopic Foveoschisis ◽  
Air Tamponade

Purpose. To investigate the outcome of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with suitable internal limiting membrane peeling (ILM) and air tamponade for patients with highly myopic foveoschisis-associated lamellar macular hole (MH). Methods. This retrospective interventional case series included 11 patients with highly myopic foveoschisis-associated lamellar MH who underwent PPV and indocyanine green-aided ILM peeling up to the temporal vascular arcades. Following air tamponade after surgery, all patients were instructed to maintain a face-down position. The patients were followed up for over 1 year and evaluated for MH closure and the best-corrected visual acuity before and after surgery. Results. The mean ± standard deviation values of patient age, axial length, and follow-up duration were 67.82 ± 6.54 years, 29.21 ± 1.95 mm, and 24.27 ± 8.11 months, respectively. After surgery, the lamellar MH closed in all eyes, and 10 eyes showed vision improvement at the 1-month, 3-month, and final follow-up evaluations. One patient showed decreased vision at 2 years after surgery, with patchy chorioretinal atrophy in the macular region. Myopic foveoschisis showed resolution in three eyes and alleviation in eight. Ten patients underwent cataract surgery during PPV. Conclusion. Extension of ILM peeling up to the temporal vascular arcades and air tamponade after PPV may improve the visual function and rate of MH closure for patients with highly myopic foveoschisis-associated lamellar MH.

scholarly journals The Management of Lamellar Macular Holes: A Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Ciprian Danielescu ◽  
Horia Tudor Stanca ◽  
Florian Balta
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
First Year ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Macular Holes ◽  
Full Thickness Macular Hole ◽  
Phakic Eyes ◽  
Over Time

This literature review aims to provide the retina specialist with answers to patient’s questions related to the management of lamellar macular holes (LMHs). Most LMHs are stable over time, but 13–21% present an anatomic decline after 18–24 months of follow-up. Nineteen point five percent of the eyes may experience a visual acuity (VA) loss of more than 5 letters after 3 years. Many surgeons choose to perform surgery when there is significant metamorphopsia or documented decline in VA over time. The typical surgery is phacovitrectomy with the epiretinal membrane and the internal limiting membrane peeling in previously phakic eyes (41.9 to 85.3% of the eyes). In the eyes that remained phakic, cataract surgery was often necessary within the first year of follow-up (19.2 to 40% of eyes). After surgery, a VA gain was recorded in 63–94% of eyes, but some eyes (between 0 and 20%) suffered some VA loss. Progression to full-thickness macular hole may occur after surgery, and thus a second surgical intervention may be needed.

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy evaluation of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Shen ◽  
Xiaoqin Lin ◽  
Luyi Zhang ◽  
Miaoqin Wu
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Membrane Peeling ◽  
Visual Outcomes ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes (MH). Methods Related studies were reviewed by searching electronic databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library. We searched for articles that compared inverted ILM flap technique with ILM peeling for large MH (> 400 μm). Double-arm meta-analysis was performed for the primary end point that was the rate of MH closure, and the secondary end point was postoperative visual acuity (VA). Heterogeneity, publication bias, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted to guarantee the statistical power. Results This review included eight studies involving 593 eyes, 4 randomized control trials and 4 retrospective studies. After sensitivity analysis for eliminating the heterogeneity of primary outcome, the pooled data showed the rate of MH closure with inverted ILM flap technique group was statistically significantly higher than ILM peeling group (odds ratio (OR) = 3.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.89 to 8.27; P = 0.0003). At the follow-up duration of 3 months, postoperative VA was significantly better in the group of inverted ILM flap than ILM peeling (mean difference (MD) = − 0.16, 95% CI = − 0.23 to 0.09; P < 0.00001). However, there was no difference in visual outcomes between the two groups of different surgical treatments at relatively long-term follow-up over 6 months (MD = 0.01, 95% CI = − 0.12 to 0.15; P = 0.86). Conclusion Vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap technique had a better anatomical outcome than ILM peeling. Flap technique also had a signifcant visual gain in the short term, but the limitations in visual recovery at a longer follow-up was found.

scholarly journals Comparison of Individual Retinal Layer Thicknesses after Epiretinal Membrane Surgery with or without Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Chul Hee Lee ◽  
Min Woo Lee ◽  
Eun Young Choi ◽  
Suk Ho Byeon ◽  
Sung Soo Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Epiretinal Membrane ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Retinal Layer ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Fiber Layer ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Department Of Ophthalmology ◽  
Layer Segmentation

Purpose. To compare changes in the retinal layer thickness and visual outcomes in patients undergoing epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. Methods. Seventy-six eyes of 76 patients who underwent ERM surgery from January 2013 to March 2015 at the Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, were analyzed. While ERM removal with ILM peeling was performed in ILM peeling (P) group (n=39), ILM peeling was not performed in non-ILM peeling (NP) group (n=37). Retinal layer segmentation was performed using optical coherence tomography images. Individual retinal layer thicknesses before and at 6 months after ERM surgery were compared. The postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was also compared. Results. In the P group, the thicknesses of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), and inner plexiform layer (IPL) were significantly reduced. In the NP group, significant decreases in the RNFL, GCL, IPL, inner nuclear layer, and outer plexiform layer were observed. The P group manifested a greater mean postoperative GCL (35.56 ± 1.53 µm vs 29.86 ± 2.16 µm; p=0.033) and less loss of GCL (−10.26 ± 1.91 µm vs −19.86 ± 2.74 µm; p=0.004) compared to the NP group. No statistically significant differences were observed when comparing the changes in BCVA. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that ILM peeling for ERM surgery may result in better preservation of GCL compared to no ILM peeling.

Evaluation of Macular Changes in Long Term Period Following Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Diabetic Macular Edema

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betul Onal Gunay ◽  
Gurkan Erdogan
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Pars Plana Vitrectomy ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Final Visit ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Pars Plana

Aim: To evaluate long term macular changes following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for diabetic macular edema (DME) Methods: Forty eligible eyes of 37 patients were included in this retrospective study. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) and 5-mm macular volume (5-MV) were examined preoperatively and at postoperative 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th months and final visits. Response to surgical treatment was considered as recurrence, reincrease and recovery of DME based on macular changes. Results: Mean follow-up time was 51.1±19.0 months following surgery. Recurrence (n=5) and reincrease (n=17) of DME was observed in 22 eyes (55%) and additional treatments were applied. Recovery of DME was observed in 18 eyes (45%). Preoperative and final visit mean BCVAs (logMAR) were 1.08±0.37 and 0.93±0.45, respectively (p=0.02). Preoperative and final visit mean CMTs were 514.74±155.65 µm and 281.87±112.58 µm, respectively (p<0.001). The 5-MV significantly decreased following surgery (8.18±1.57 mm3 to 6.52±1.39 mm3) (p<0.001). DME was present in 12 eyes (%30) at final visit. Conclusion: Although PPV with ILM peeling had an efficacy in DME management, this effect tends to decrease over time such that considerable amount of patients required additional treatment.

scholarly journals Role of internal limiting membrane peeling in the prevention of epiretinal membrane formation following vitrectomy for retinal detachment: a randomised trial

2019 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2019-315095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod Kumar ◽  
Devashish Dubey ◽  
Devesh Kumawat ◽  
Ashish Markan ◽  
Parijat Chandra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Detachment ◽  
Epiretinal Membrane ◽  
Conventional Treatment ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Group 2

AimTo study the role of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in the prevention of macular epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).MethodsIn a randomised trial, patients with macula-off RRD (duration ≤3 months) with proliferative vitreoretinopathy grade ≤C1 and absence of pre-existing maculopathy were recruited from June 2016 to May 2018. Patients were randomised into two groups: group 1 (conventional treatment) underwent PPV alone, while group 2 underwent PPV with macular ILM peeling. The main outcome measures were macular ERM formation (detected on optical coherence tomography), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), retinal attachment and central macular thickness (CMT) at last follow-up (minimum 6 months).ResultsSixty patients (30 in each group) completed the required follow-up. The two groups were comparable in sex distribution, age, duration of RRD, baseline CDVA and duration of follow-up (median 15.5 vs 14 months). Macular ERM developed in 20% (n=6) and 0% of eyes in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.002). Retinal reattachment was attained in all eyes. There was no statistical difference in final CDVA between the groups (p=0.43). Dissociated optic nerve fibre layer (DONFL) was found in 0% and 40% (n=12) of eyes in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.0001). However, DONFL did not significantly affect the final CDVA (p=0.84). The final CMT was 266.0±37.5 µm and 270.0±73.7 µm in groups 1 and 2, respectively, with no statistical difference (p=0.62).ConclusionsILM peeling prevents macular ERM formation following PPV for RRD but provides similar visual outcomes as compared with conventional treatment.Trial registration numberCTRI2018/04/012978.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document