scholarly journals Revisitando a Escola Inglesa – da velha via média das Relações Internacionais à nova escola inglesa

Intelligere ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 140-161
Author(s):  
Raquel de Caria Patrício
Keyword(s):  

Este artigo procura posicionar a Escola Inglesa na via intermédia entre o Realismo e o Idealismo, focando-se no pensamento de Hedley Bull e Martin Wight, e analisar a evolução da Escola Inglesa após o derrube do muro de Berlim, quando novas problemáticas foram agregadas ao estudo da sociedade internacional e das instituições internacionais. Pretende-se ainda demonstrar como a Escola Inglesa, fundada nas normas e nos padrões regulares de comportamento, é uma grande influência para a abordagem construtivista.  Frente a estas realidades, surge a grande pergunta de partida: por que razão, apesar dos estudos de Hedley Bull e de Martin Wight sobre a sociedade internacional e as instituições internacionais, a Escola Inglesa se manteve, à época, marginalizada frente à Escola Norte-Americana de Relações Internacionais?, a qual origina objetivos, alguns dos quais já mencionados, e hipóteses de trabalho, que serão alcançados e comprovadas.

Author(s):  
Louis W. Pauly

If Hedley Bull came back today and revised his most famous book, he would likely devote a chapter to the economic forces that transformed our world during the past four decades. Among other systemic changes, the radical unleashing of finance and the partial return of a pre-1914 economic ideology justifying open and integrating capital markets might surprise an advocate of the virtues of the states system. But by following Bull’s reasoning, his model of empirical observation, and his underlying moral sensibilities—as well as suggestions from his constructive critics—this essay traces the emergence since the late 1970s of a variegated global capacity to assess systemic financial risks, design collaborative policies to prevent systemic crises, and manage them when they nevertheless occur. The challenge of deeply legitimating that nuanced and complex capacity remains, which, as Bull anticipated, means that considerations of justice must soon be addressed.


Author(s):  
David Boucher

The classic foundational status that Hobbes has been afforded by contemporary international relations theorists is largely the work of Hans Morgenthau, Martin Wight, and Hedley Bull. They were not unaware that they were to some extent creating a convenient fiction, an emblematic realist, a shorthand for all of the features encapsulated in the term. The detachment of international law from the law of nature by nineteenth-century positivists opened Hobbes up, even among international jurists, to be portrayed as almost exclusively a mechanistic theorist of absolute state sovereignty. If we are to endow him with a foundational place at all it is not because he was an uncompromising realist equating might with right, on the analogy of the state of nature, but instead to his complete identification of natural law with the law of nations. It was simply a matter of subject that distinguished them, the individual and the state.


1987 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Watson

Hedley Bull's contribution to the theory of international relations is considerable; and nowhere more acute than in the distinction which he made between the concept of a system of states and that of an international society. His definitive formulation is set out in Chapter I of The Anarchical Society. ‘Where states are in regular contact with one another, and where in addition there is interaction between them sufficient to make the behaviour of each a necessary element in the calculations of the other, then we may speak of their forming a system.’ ‘A society of states (or international society) exists when a group of states, conscious of certain common interests and common values, form a society in the sense that they conceive themselves to be bound by a common set of rules in their relations with one another, and share in the working of common institutions.’


Author(s):  
Gilberto Vaciles Bilacchi Júnior
Keyword(s):  

O presente ar go tem por obje vo analisar, com base nas diferentes correntes teóricas do direi- to internacional, como se dá a tomada de decisões dos países no âmbito das relações internacionais. Começaremos por uma análise do mundo jurídico e do mundo polí co, e a forma como estão organizados os países atualmente reconhecidos pela Organização das Nações Unidas. Posteriormente, adentraremos as relações internacionais e as suas teorias, analisando as principais correntes de pensamento que são o liberalismo, o realismo, a teoria radical e a economia polí ca internacional. O destaque será dado para a Escola das Três Tradições, que se baseia nos conceitos de Hedley Bull e Martin Wight de três tradições de ação no ambiente internacional. Para facilitar a compreensão do tema, u lizaremos como exemplo a disputa comercial acer- ca dos subsídios agrícolas, travada entre o Brasil e os Estados Unidos da América, perante a Organização Mundial do Comércio. Ao m, concluiremos opinando pelo po de decisão tomada pelo governo brasileiro ao rmar acordo com o país norte-americano acerca da disputa comercial, e em qual das teorias analisadas mais se amolda o atual estágio das relações internacionais. 


1986 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley Hoffmann

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document