scholarly journals Coronary flow regulation in patients with ischemic heart disease: release of purines and prostacyclin and the effect of inhibitors of prostaglandin formation.

Circulation ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 1113-1120 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Edlund ◽  
B Berglund ◽  
D van Dorne ◽  
L Kaijser ◽  
J Nowak ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Imaoka ◽  
N Umemoto ◽  
S Oshima

Abstract Background In clinical setting, ischemic heart disease is a challenging problem in hemodialysis (HD) population. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) measured by 13 ammonia positron emitting tomography (13NH3PET) is an established and reliable modality for detecting coronary artery disease. Furthermore, some prior studies show CFR is an important and independent predictor for cardiovascular event and mortality. On the other hand, HD patients with malnutrition status have poor prognosis. We have reported about the relationship between cardiovascular events and geriatric nutrition risk index (GNRI). Now, we wonder the predictability of combination of CFR and GNRI. Methods and result We collected 438 consecutive HD patients who received 13NH3PET in our hospital suspected for ischemic heart disease. 29 patients were excluded due to undergoing coronary revascularization within 60 days, 103 patients were excluded due to incomplete database. In total, 306 HD patients were classified into 4 group according the median value of CFR (1.99) and GNRI (97.73); Low CFR Low GNRI group (n=77), High CFR and Low GNRI group (n=76), Low CFR High GNRI group (n=78) and High CFR High GNRI group (n=75). We collected their follow up data up to 1544 days (median 833 days) about all-cause mortality and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Surprisingly, there is no mortality event in High CFR High GNRI group. We analyzed about all-cause mortality, CV mortality. Kaplan-Meyer analysis shows there are statistically intergroup differences in each (all-cause mortality; log rank p<0.01, CV mortality; log rank p=0.02). Furthermore, we calculated area under the curve (AUC) analysis, net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI)m adding GNRI and CFR on conventional risk factors. There are intergroup differences for all-cause mortality in AUC [conventional risk factors, +GNRI, +GNRI+CFR; 0.70, 0.72 (p=0.29), 0.79 (p<0.01)], NRI [+GNRI; 0.32 (p=0.04), +GNRI+CFR 0.82 (p<0.01)] and IDI [+GNRI; 0.01 (p=0.05), +GNRI+CFR 0.09 (p<0.01)]. Conclusion HD patients with low CFR and malnutrition status has statistically significant poorer prognosis comparing HD patients with high CFR and without malnutrition status. Adding combination of GNRI and CFR on conventional risk factors improves the predictability of HD population's prognosis. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valérie E. Stegehuis ◽  
Gilbert W. M. Wijntjens ◽  
Sukhjinder S. Nijjer ◽  
Guus A. de Waard ◽  
Tim P. van de Hoef ◽  
...  

Background Although ischemic heart disease has a complex and multilevel origin, the diagnostic approach is mainly focused on focal obstructive disease as assessed by pressure‐derived indexes. The prognostic relevance of coronary flow over coronary pressure has been suggested and implies that identification of relevant perfusion abnormalities by invasive physiology techniques is critical for the correct identification of patients who benefit from coronary revascularization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of a sequential approach using pressure‐derived indexes instantaneous wave‐free ratio ( iFR ), fractional flow reserve ( FFR ), and coronary flow reserve ( CFR ) measurements to determine the number of intermediate lesions associated with flow abnormalities after initial pressure measurements. Methods and Results A total of 366 intermediate lesions were assessed with simultaneous intracoronary pressure and flow velocity measurements. Contemporary clinical iFR , FFR, and CFR cut points for myocardial ischemia were applied. A total of 118 (32%) lesions were FFR + and 136 (37%) lesions were iFR +. Subsequent CFR assessment resulted for FFR in a total of 91 (25%) FFR +/ CFR + and for iFR a total of 111 (30%) iFR +/ CFR + lesions. An iFR , FFR , and invasive flow velocity assessment approach would have yielded 20% of lesions (74 of 366) as ischemic. Conclusions Ultimately, 20% of intermediate lesions are associated with flow abnormalities after applying a pressure and flow velocity sequential approach. If iFR is borderline, FFR has limited additional value, in contrast with CFR . These results emphasize the use of coronary physiology in assessing stenosis severity but may also further question the contemporary reputation of a pressure‐based approach as a gold standard for the detection of myocardial ischemia in ischemic heart disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document