Abstract 2875: Long-Term Outcomes Following Vascular Surgery in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Analysis of Randomized and Excluded Patients from the Coronary Artery Revascularization Prophylaxis (CARP) Trial

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Santiago Garcia ◽  
Herbert B Ward ◽  
Thomas Moritz ◽  
Fred Littooy ◽  
Steve Goldman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Vascular Surgery ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Coronary Artery Revascularization ◽  
Probability Of Survival ◽  
Artery Disease

Background: The Coronary Artery Revascularization Prophylaxis (CARP) Trial was a multicenter randomized study that showed no long-term survival benefit with revascularization prior to elective vascular surgery in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). To determine whether subsets with high-risk anatomy benefited from preoperative revascularization, survival was determined in randomized and registry patients who underwent coronary angiography within 6 months of vascular surgery. Methods: Over a 4-year enrollment period, 4,876 patients were screened prior to vascular surgery and 1,048 (21.5%) had preoperative coronary angiography for either multiple cardiac risks or an abnormal preoperative stress test. The cohort included 462 randomized and 586 excluded patients and the probability of survival was determined at 2.5 years following vascular surgery. Results: Of 1,048 patients with preoperative coronary angiography, non-obstructive disease (< 70%) was present in 192 (18.3%) and 1 vessel disease (VD) was present in 244 (23.3%), with a combined survival of 0.84. Previous bypass surgery (CABG) was present in 225 (21.5%), with a survival of 0.78. High risk coronary anatomy in patients without prior CABG included 2-VD in 204 (19.5%), 3-VD in 130 (12.4%) and an unprotected left main stenosis > 50% in 48 (4.6%) patients. Their long-term survival according to the preoperative revascularization status is shown in the Table . Conclusions: The results demonstrate that an unprotected left main stenosis was present in 4.6% of high-risk patients presenting for vascular surgery and was the only anatomical subset that demonstrated a survival benefit with preoperative revascularization prior to vascular surgery. These data may warrant additional strategies to identify patients with unprotected left main disease either prior to or immediately following vascular surgery. Long-Term Probability of Survival at 2.5 Years Following Vascular Surgery

Anemia increases long-term mortality in patients undergoing conventional coronary angiography – the ECAT registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Balcer ◽  
I Dykun ◽  
S Hendricks ◽  
F Al-Rashid ◽  
M Totzeck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Conventional Coronary Angiography ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Background Anemia is a frequent comorbidity in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Besides a complemental effect on myocardial oxygen undersupply of CAD and anemia, available data suggests that it may independently impact the prognosis in CAD patients. We aimed to determine the association of anemia with long-term survival in a longitudinal registry of patients undergoing conventional coronary angiography. Methods The present analysis is based on the ECAD registry of patients undergoing conventional coronary angiography at the Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine at the University Clinic Essen between 2004 and 2019. For this analysis, we excluded all patients with missing hemoglobin levels at baseline admission or missing follow-up information. Anemia was defined as a hemoglobin level of &lt;13.0g/dl for male and &lt;12.0g/dl for female patients according to the world health organization's definition. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the association of anemia with morality, stratifying by clinical presentation of patients. Hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval are depicted for presence vs. absence of anemia. Results Overall, data from 28,917 patient admissions (mean age: 65.3±13.2 years, 69% male) were included in our analysis (22,570 patients without and 6,347 patients with anemia). Prevalence of anemia increased by age group (age &lt;50 years: 16.0%, age ≥80 years: 27.7%). During a mean follow-up of 3.2±3.4 years, 4,792 deaths of any cause occurred (16.6%). In patients with anemia, mortality was relevantly higher as compared to patients without anemia (13.4% vs. 28.0% for patients without and with anemia, respectively, p&lt;0.0001, figure 1). In univariate regression analysis, anemia was associated with 2.4-fold increased mortality risk (2.27–2.55, p&lt;0.0001). Effect sizes remained stable upon adjustment for traditional risk factors (2.38 [2.18–2.61], p&lt;0.0001). Mortality risk accountable to anemia was significantly higher for patients receiving coronary interventions (2.62 [2.35–2.92], p&lt;0.0001) as compared to purely diagnostic coronary angiography examinations (2.31 [2.15–2.47], p&lt;0.0001). Likewise, survival probability was slightly worse for patients with anemia in acute coronary syndrome (2.70 [2.29–3.12], p&lt;0.0001) compared to chronic coronary syndrome (2.60 [2.17–3.12], p&lt;0.0001). Interestingly, within the ACS entity, association of anemia with mortality was relevantly lower in STEMI patients (1.64 [1.10–2.44], p=0.014) as compared to NSTEMI and IAP (NSTEMI: 2.68 [2.09–3.44], p&lt;0.0001; IAP: 2.67 [2.06–3.47], p&lt;0.0001). Conclusion In this large registry of patients undergoing conventional coronary angiography, anemia was a frequent comorbidity. Anemia relevantly influences log-term survival, especially in patients receiving percutaneous coronary interventions. Our results confirm the important role of anemia for prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease, demonstrating the need for specific treatment options. Figure 1. Kaplan Meier analysis Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of peripheral arterial disease patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e0251542
Author(s):  
Byoung Geol Choi ◽  
Ji-Yeon Hong ◽  
Seung-Woon Rha ◽  
Cheol Ung Choi ◽  
Michael S. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Significant Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Background Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) have known to a high risk of cardiac mortality. However, the effectiveness of the routine evaluation of coronary arteries such as routine coronary angiography (CAG) in PAD patients receiving percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is unclear. Methods A total of 765 consecutive PAD patients underwent successful PTA and 674 patients (88.1%) underwent routine CAG. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was defined as angiographic stenosis ≥70%. Patients were divided into three groups; 1) routine CAG and a presence of CAD (n = 413 patients), 2) routine CAG and no CAD group (n = 261 patients), and 3) no CAG group (n = 91 patients). To adjust for any potential confounders that could cause bias, multivariable Cox-proportional hazards regression and propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curved analysis at 5-year follow-up. Results In this study, the 5-year survival rate of patients with PAD who underwent PTA was 88.5%. Survival rates were similar among the CAD group, the no CAD group, and the no CAG group, respectively (87.7% vs. 90.4% vs. 86.8% P = 0.241). After PSM analysis between the CAD group and the no CAD group, during the 5-year clinical follow-up, there were no differences in the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, strokes, peripheral revascularization, or target extremity surgeries between the two groups except for repeat PCI, which was higher in the CAD group than the non-CAD group (9.3% vs. 0.8%, P<0.001). Conclusion PAD patients with CAD were expected to have very poor long-term survival, but they are shown no different long-term prognosis such as mortality compared to PAD patients without CAD. These PAD patients with CAD had received PCI and/or optimal medication treatment after the CAG. Therefore a strategy of routine CAG and subsequent PCI, if required, appears to be a reasonable strategy for mortality risk reduction of PAD patients. Our results highlight the importance for evaluation for CAD in patients with PAD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document