Abstract 4230: Comparison of Dobutamine-atropine Stress Echocardiography and Magnetic Resonance for Detection of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease by Assessing Wall Motion and Myocardial Perfusion Abnormalities

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra N Falcao ◽  
Jeane Tsutsui ◽  
Carlos E Rochitte ◽  
Luis Silva ◽  
Pedro A Lemos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion ◽  
Stress Echocardiography ◽  
Wall Motion ◽  
Contrast Echocardiography ◽  
Dobutamine Stress ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Mechanical Index

Background: The analysis of wall motion abnormalities (WMA) with dobutamine stress echocardiography or magnetic resonance is an established method for the detection of myocardial ischemia. Contrast echocardiography has been demonstrated a useful technique for evaluating myocardial perfusion (MP). We test the hypothesis that combination of MP and WMA would improve the diagnosis of coronary artery diseasen (CAD). Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (RTMCE) and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (G-MRI) for detecting CAD by analyzing left ventricular WMA and MP. Methods: We prospectively studied 46 patients (23 males, mean age 58±8 years) referred for coronary angiography, RTMCE and MRI within a maximum interval of two weeks. Protocol used in RTMCE and G-MRI was four-stage dobutamine protocol (10 – 40 mcg/kg/min), with injection of atropine as required to reach 85% of age-adjusted target heart rate. Patients underwent first dobutamine stress RTMCE and then G-MRI using the same doses of dobutamine and atropine. RTMCE was performed using low-mechanical index imaging combined with intravenous commercially available contrast agent (Definity, Bristol-Myers Squibb). Positivity for the stress test was defined as new or worsening WMA or reversible perfusion defects in >2 contiguous segments. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was performed in all patients. CAD was defined as the presence of lesion >50 % in at least one coronary artery territory. Results: All patients tolerated well dobutamine stress. In five patients G-MRI was not performed (2 because of claustrofobia, 1 because patient did not fit in MRI, 2 because of extensive ischemia by dobutamine RTMCE). A total of 41 patients underwent dobutamine RTMCE, G-MRI and QCA. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to detect CAD by dobutamine RTMCE were 74%, 89% and 80% for the analysis of wall motion, 83%, 89% and 85% for the analysis of MP and 65%, 83% and 73% for dobutamine stress G-MRI. C onclusion: RTMCE seems to have better performance for detecting angiographically significant CAD than G-MRI using dobutamine stress. The analysis of MP increases sensitivity to RTMCE without changing specificity.

Abstract 2086: Usefulness of Pneumatic Lower Extremity Compression During Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyung-Kwan Kim ◽  
Sung-A Chang ◽  
Jin-Shik Park ◽  
Yong-Jin Kim ◽  
Joo-Hee Zo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Stress Echocardiography ◽  
Positive Response ◽  
Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Lower Extremities ◽  
Wall Stress ◽  
Dobutamine Stress ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Myocardial Oxygen Demand

Background Afterload is expected to increase with pneumatic compression of the lower extremities. Therefore, left ventricular (LV) wall stress which is the most important factor determining myocardial oxygen demand will also increase, leading to an increase in sensitivity of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) or shortened time to positive response.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of pneumatic compression of lower extremities on the diagnostic accuracy of DSE. Methods In 40 patients who underwent DSE and were anticipating coronary angiography, DSE was repeated with the pneumatic compression (100mmHg) of lower extremities (DSEcomp) prior to coronary angiography. Sensitivity and specificity of DSE and DSEcomp were determined based on the coronary angiographic finding. Results All patients tolerated pneumatic compression of the lower extremities during the tests. LV end-systolic volume (p=0.042) and end-systolic wall stress (p=0.036) were significantly greater in the DSEcomp than DSE. In 3 patients with false negative results in DSE, DSEcomp showed positive responses, demonstrating a significant increase in sensitivity from 75% to 94% (p=0.045). Only 1 patient with true negative result in DSE was interpreted as showing positive response in DSEcomp, resulting in a decrease in specificity from 88% to 83% (p=NS). In 11 of 13 patients with true positive results both in DSE and DSEcomp, positive responses were seen at least 1 stage earlier in DSEcomp compared to DSE. Conclusions Pneumatic compression of lower extremities increases the sensitivity of DSE and shortens the time to positive response.

scholarly journals The dilemma of ischemia testing with different methods

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. K1-K4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Pia Donataccio ◽  
Claudio Reverberi ◽  
Nicola Gaibazzi
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion ◽  
Stress Echocardiography ◽  
Wall Motion ◽  
Multivessel Disease ◽  
List Type ◽  
Flow Reserve ◽  
Perfusion Defects ◽  
Perfusion Assessment ◽  
Motion Assessment

SummaryA 52-year-old man presented after one episode of effort angina, normal treadmill electrocardiogram (ECG), and clearly positive adenosine cardiac magnetic resonance (aCMR) for reversible perfusion defects in the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery territory. Contrast high-dose dipyridamole (0.84 mg/kg per 6 min) stress echocardiography (cSE) demonstrated normal myocardial perfusion (MP) and wall motion at rest, while perfusion defects were shown in the lateral and apical segments after dipyridamole. Wall motion at stress was completely normal and stress/rest Doppler diastolic velocity ratio on the LAD demonstrated reduced flow reserve. In this case, cSE was the provocative test detecting both the LAD and circumflex obstructive lesions, thanks to MP analysis, while wall motion assessment was negative, not different from treadmill ECG, and aCMR highlighted only the LAD disease.Learning pointsIn spite of the low sensitivity of wall motion assessment during stress-echocardiography to detect coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with multivessel disease and balanced ischemia, the addition of cSE with myocardial perfusion assessment, is not only able to overcome this limitation of false negative rate on a per-patient basis, but may also depict multivessel myocardial perfusion defects more efficiently than aCMR, as in the reported case, thanks to high spatial resolution.Myocardial perfusion assessment during cSE, although not always technically feasible, has a very high spatial and temporal resolution which can easily demonstrate multivessel subendocardial perfusion defects during maximal vasodilation, which is often the only detectable marker of multivessel, balanced CAD.It is known that wall motion analysis during pharmacologic stress may result in falsely negative multivessel disease; in these cases perfusion imaging or Doppler measurement of coronary flow reserve may be helpful to detect multivessel obstructive CAD, which is a significant and dismal prognostic finding. aCMR is assumed as the perfect imaging modality for CAD detection, but in selected cases, such as the one presented, an advanced echocardiographic method in experienced hands can provide even more comprehensive results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document